FBI Tarnishes What's Left of Its Credibility


 IJR Opinion is an opinion platform and any opinions or information put forth by contributors are exclusive to them and do not represent the views of IJR.
FBI Director Robert Muller Holds News Conference
Alex Wong/Getty Images

More than a year after the Federal Bureau of Investigation seized on the Russia collusion narrative, the agency has still found nothing of consequence.

That’s right. Despite the liberal media fanning the flames, there is still no evidence for the oft-repeated claim that President Donald Trump and the Russian government somehow colluded to win the 2016 election. It comes as no surprise to the nearly 63 million people who voted for the president despite the left's insistence they were somehow influenced by the Kremlin. But the FBI's lack of progress speaks volumes nonetheless.

Recent weeks have raised, however, serious questions about the FBI's own credibility. It starts at the top, with special counsel Robert Mueller.

Look closer at Mueller's probe, and you'll find a purely partisan witch hunt. Several members of Mueller's team have ties to the Democratic Party.

Not only did Jeannie Rhee donate to a Hillary Clinton super PAC, but she also represented the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering case and Clinton herself in a lawsuit seeking access to her emails. Andrew Weissmann donated six times to Obama-affiliated groups. James Quarles has given to more than a dozen Democratic PACs since the 1980s.

As Sidney Powell, a longtime federal prosecutor who served both political parties, recently explained: “The Mueller investigation has become an all-out assault to find crimes to pin on [the president] — and it won't matter if there are no crimes to be found.”

Even worse, the FBI's diminishing credibility transcends the current Trump probe.

Earlier in October, government documents and interviews revealed the FBI had knowledge of Russian misconduct long before the Obama administration — and one Hillary Rodham Clinton — approved the controversial 2010 uranium deal. Before the Obama-Clinton team agreed to give Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had already gathered substantial evidence linking Russian nuclear industry officials to bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering — all in an attempt to grow Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business on our soil.

Moreover, the FBI found out the Russian officials had routed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation during the time then-Secretary of State Clinton signed off on the uranium deal.

And the agency still did nothing.

Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, Eric Holder's Department of Justice continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years. In other words, the Justice Department sat on the information for political reasons. This essentially left Congress and the American people in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil.

And we're now trusting federal prosecutors to probe the Trump administration fairly? Mueller's vendetta resembles anything but “justice.”

Perhaps the FBI should focus on its Las Vegas investigation, which has yielded no real insight into the shooter's motives or the sequence of events.

The agency refuses to release any information concerning the investigation of the worst mass shooting in U.S. history — which tragically claimed 58 innocent lives — even as evidence is continually released and then changed within days.

The liberal media, meanwhile, has moved on from the Las Vegas shooting to undermine the Trump agenda at every turn. Coverage of the FBI's investigation has largely subsided even though countless Americans demand answers.

In lieu of an explanation, Robert Mueller will give them more of the same anti-Trump witch hunt. Don't buy any of it.

Given the FBI's history of corruption and cover-up, there's no reason to trust Mueller or his liberal accomplices. Don't be fooled by a crooked cop playing a good guy.

5 Comments
5 Comments
Be the first to comment!
FEATURED
sort by: latest