Alabama Governor Signs Strictest US Abortion Ban Into Law

REUTERS/Marvin Gentry/

Alabama’s governor signed a bill on Wednesday to ban nearly all abortions in the state, even in cases of rape and incest, in the latest challenge by conservatives to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision establishing a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy.

U.S. abortion rights activists had already vowed to go to court to block enforcement of the Alabama measure, the strictest anti-abortion law yet enacted with the intention of provoking reconsideration of the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling.

That effort has thrust the emotional debate over abortion back to the forefront of national politics in the run-up to the 2020 U.S. presidential elections.

Governor Kay Ivey, a Republican, signed the measure a day after the Republican-controlled state Senate approved the ban and rejected a Democratic-backed amendment to allow abortions for women and girls impregnated by rape or incest.

“To the bill’s many supporters, this legislation stands as a powerful testament to Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is precious and that every life is a sacred gift from God,” Ivey said in a statement.

Abortion supporters across the country condemned the bill as part of a Republican-backed assault on the rights of women to control their own bodies.

“This is the war on women,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, “It’s in full swing, and it’s decades in the making.”

The Alabama law would take effect in six months.

Legislation to restrict abortion rights has been introduced this year in 16 states, four of whose governors have signed bills banning abortion if an embryonic heartbeat can be detected.

Planned Parenthood joined the American Civil Liberties Union on Wednesday in filing a legal challenge to Ohio’s recent ban on abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.

The Alabama bill goes further, banning abortions at any time, unless the mother’s health is in danger. Those performing abortions would be committing a felony, punishable by up to 99 years in prison. A woman who receives an abortion would not be held criminally liable.

‘GONE TOO FAR’

Most of the Democratic candidates seeking their party’s 2020 nomination to run for the White House condemned the Alabama law, calling it an attack on women’s rights and vowing to fight to uphold legal access to abortion.

“The idea that supposed leaders have passed a law that would criminalize a physician for assisting a woman on something that she, in consult with her physician, with her God, with her faith leader, has made the decision to do, that is her body that you would criminalize,” U.S. Senator Kamala Harris of California, one of the large field of hopefuls, said at a town hall on Wednesday morning in Nashua, New Hampshire.

Some on Twitter had called on their allies to mail coat hangers to Ivey, as a reminder of the illegal abortion practices common before it was made legal.

Christian television broadcaster Pat Robertson, a staunch critic of Roe v. Wade, said the Alabama law “has gone too far.”

“It’s an extreme law, and they want to challenge Roe versus Wade. But my humble view is that this is not the case we want to bring to the Supreme Court because I think this one will lose,” Robertson said on his program, “The 700 Club.”

Anti-abortion advocates are aware that any laws they pass are certain to be challenged. Courts this year have blocked a restrictive Kentucky law and another in Iowa passed last year.

But supporters of the Alabama ban said the right to life of the fetus transcended other rights, an idea they would like tested at the Supreme Court.

The highest U.S. court, now with a majority of conservative justices after Republican President Donald Trump appointed two, could possibly overturn Roe v. Wade. That decision held that the due process clause of the 14th Amendment provides a fundamental right to privacy that protects a woman’s right to abortion.

Roe v. Wade did allow states to place restrictions on the procedure from the time a fetus could viably survive outside the womb, except in cases in which a woman’s health was otherwise at risk. A fetus is generally considered viable at 22 to 24 weeks. A full-term pregnancy typically is about 40 weeks.

Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi and Ohio enacted statutes this year outlawing abortion after a doctor can detect an embryonic heartbeat.

Opponents call the “heartbeat” legislation a virtual ban because embryonic cardiac activity can be detected as early as six weeks, before a woman may even be aware she is pregnant.

(Reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles and Daniel Trotta in New York; Additional reporting by Barbara Goldberg in New York, Ginger Gibson in Washington, and Alex Dobuzinskis in Los Angeles; Writing by Scott Malone; Editing by Jonathan Oatis, Lisa Shumaker and Paul Tait)

What do you think?

5 pledges
Upvote Downvote

9
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
TOM
Member

” “This is the war on women,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom . . .”. Butt out this is a Georgia law not a Californication law. In Californication you are still allowed to murder with impunity.

James
Member

This Bill will certainly put Planned Butcherhood out of business and close all their baby parts stores. Hundreds if not thousands of their hired killers will be unemployed and unable to find work except maybe as experienced hired killers for the mobs.

Morte206
Member

i rarely agree with Mr Robertson but on this I have to agree with him, this bill goes too far.

TOM
Member

I would not have thought that you supported genocide.

Ed
Member

The problem is that the line is drawn in different places for everyone. If abortion is indeed murder at any stage, why should some babies lose their protection due to the circumstances of their conception?

Even the most strident pro-life parent might cave if their 11 year old daughter was impregnated after being raped by a 40-year-old undocumented immigrant transgender female in a public bathroom.

James
Member

Correct me if I’m wrong; but I recollect reading somewhere in the U.S. Declaration of Independence something about “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” being an “unalienable right” all citizens of the U.S. have. Shouldn’t those three RIGHTS also be afforded to unborn children with a beating heart?

Ed
Member

Close, but not quite there. In 1776, there were no citizens of the US. You didn’t quote the “all men are created equal” part (which was a bit ironic considering the time) and somehow paraphrased it as “all citizens of the US”.

For that matter, you’re not a citizen until you get a birth certificate and an SSN, so that’s a pretty big loophole in your logic.

I’m not saying I don’t agree with you, but everyone has their own unique opinion on abortion.

Karen
Guest
Karen

Ed I think you just won the internet.

Jason Alsbrook
Member

Don’t worry. Women can still kill their babies…just not there..🙂

Kamala Harris

Democrats Harris and Biden Clash Over 1994 Crime Bill in New Hampshire Stops

Trump to Propose Plan to Make US Immigration More Merit-Based