A BBC reporter attempted to confront Twitter CEO Elon Musk on hateful content on the platform, but it did not turn out as he had planned.
During the interview Tuesday night, Musk asked James Clayton, when he mentioned hateful content, âSo you think if something is slightly sexist, it should be banned?â
Clayton replied, âIâm not saying anything.â
Musk responded, âIâm just curious what you mean by hateful content. Iâm asking for specific examples. And you just said that if something is slightly sexist, thatâs hateful content. Does that mean that it should be banned?â
Clayton told Musk he âasked me whether my feed, whether itâs got less or more. Iâd say itâs got slightly more.â
The Twitter CEO then asked Clayton to give him one example.
âI honestly donât â honestly âŚâ Clayton said.
The reporter claimed he could not give an example because, âI donât actually use that feed anymore. Because I just donât particularly like it. I think a lot of people are quite similar. I only look at what my followers said.â
After Musk pointed out again how Clayton could not provide a single example, the reporter said, âIâm not sure Iâve used that feed for the last three or four weeks.â
Watch part of the interview below:
When asked again how he can see hateful content, Clayton continued, âBecause Iâve been using it. Iâve been using Twitter since youâve taken over the last six months.â
Musk replied, âSo then, you must have at some point seen that hateful content. Iâm asking you for one example, and you canât give a single one ⌠Then I say so that you donât know what youâre talking about.â
He added, âBecause you canât give a single example of hateful content. Not even one tweet. And yet, you claimed the hateful content was high. That was false. You just lied.â
The pair continued to go back and forth with Clayton failing to provide a specific example.
The video sparked thousands of reactions.
Washington Examiner columnist Ian Haworth wrote, â*This* is whatâs great about Elon Musk.â
Blaze TV host Sara Gonzales added, âLOLOL.â
One tweet argued, âThey wonât give specific examples of âhatefulâ content because itâs usually just opinions, jokes, and even factual statements they donât like. Theyâd look like idiots if they got specific. This is why they speak in general terms about a rise in hate. What they really mean is that people who disagree with them are allowed to speak. The real hatred is their disdain for dissent.â
The interview came less than two weeks after The Washington Post published an article titled, âElon Muskâs Twitter pushes hate speech, extremist content into âFor Youâ pages.â
The Post stated its analysis of Twitterâs recommendation algorithm show âaccounts that followed âextremistsâ â hate-promoting accounts identified in a list provided by the Southern Poverty Law Center â were subjected to a mix of other racist and incendiary speech.â
