Fed Judge Issues Ruling In ‘Expedited Removal’ Case

Well, well, well. Isn’t it cute when the federal judiciary decides it doesn’t have to listen to the Supreme Court? We’re not talking about minor disagreements or fuzzy legal lines here. No — this is outright judicial mutiny, cloaked in robes and gavel-smacked arrogance, and it’s happening with increasing frequency.

Let’s just start with the obvious: the Trump administration has won repeatedly at the Supreme Court. We’re talking 7-2, 6-3 — not nail-biters. These are clear, solid rulings. You’d think that would be enough to settle things. But no, because when the Left doesn’t like the outcome, they just go judge-shopping until they find a Biden or Obama appointee ready to play activist instead of referee.

Take Judge Jia Cobb. She decided — in defiance of the Supreme Court — to block expedited removals of illegal aliens. That’s not a policy choice. That’s a Supreme Court-approved enforcement mechanism. But hey, when you’re appointed by Biden, it apparently comes with an invisible clause that says you can ignore the Constitution as long as it makes MSNBC smile.

Now pause. Think about that. A federal district judge, ignoring a 7-2 SCOTUS ruling — and no, she didn’t cite any new law or overwhelming precedent. She just said nah. And the media? Crickets. Swap the parties and watch them melt down about authoritarianism and rule of law. But this? This is just “protecting democracy,” right?

But Cobb wasn’t alone. Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts pulled the same move. SCOTUS slapped down his injunction on deportations. But what did he do? He stuck with the dissent — the dissent — from Justice Sotomayor, like that’s now the law of the land. You don’t get to declare your team lost but you’re still playing.

And that’s where it gets dangerous. Because now it’s not just rogue opinions. It’s federal judges openly acting as if the highest court doesn’t matter. You don’t need a law degree to see where this leads. When one branch goes rogue, the whole system cracks. And in this case, it’s not just rogue — it’s strategic. It’s sabotage.

They know they can’t win at the Supreme Court, so they stall. Tie things up in endless appeals, knowing that even if they get overturned, the policy won’t move forward fast enough to make a difference. It’s obstructionism by robe — and it’s working.

Judge Michael Simon in Oregon? Same story. Ignored previous Supreme Court stays and blocked DHS from managing parole status for migrants. And once again, these are the very same judges who scream about threats to democracy when the other side uses the system legally and effectively.

Let’s get real. This isn’t about protecting people or due process. This is about undercutting the Trump administration at every possible turn. Judicial resistance is the new progressive hobby. They lost the presidency, they lost the Court — so now it’s all about guerrilla warfare through the lower benches.

And it’s not just immigration. It’s birthright citizenship, labor board dismissals, asylum bans — all blocked, delayed, or half-frozen by judges who believe they get to interpret the Constitution based on their morning coffee and the latest Twitter trend.

The Trump White House did score a significant win in June when the Supreme Court finally cracked down on nationwide injunctions. But did that stop the resistance? Not even a little. They just found the exception language, blew it wide open, and kept issuing blockades. As if the law is just a suggestion they can rewrite on the fly.

So now the real question isn’t whether Trump can win at the Supreme Court. He is winning. The question is — how long are we going to tolerate lower-court judges who act like the Constitution is optional if they don’t like who’s in the Oval Office?

This isn’t a judicial system anymore. It’s a political hit squad in black robes. And unless the executive branch and the Supreme Court start treating this lawless behavior as the constitutional crisis it is, we’re going to see more of it — and worse.

Because if judges can ignore the law when it’s inconvenient, then who exactly is running the country?

The post Fed Judge Issues Ruling In ‘Expedited Removal’ Case appeared first on Red Right Patriot.