
Former Obama administration intelligence officialsâ past statements donât appear to match what newly declassified information shows about key aspects of their findings on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
President Donald Trumpâs intelligence officials have been declassifying documents containing intelligence findings from the Obama administration on Russia and the 2016 election. The documents appear to contradict past statements by former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper during television interviews and before Congress.
WATCH:
For instance, Brennan said on NBCâs âMeet the Pressâ in February 2018 that the discredited Steele Dossier âdid not play any role whatsoever in the intelligence community assessments that was done that was presented to then President Obama and then President-elect Trump.â
A 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) found that Russian President Vladimir Putin interfered in the 2016 election with âa clear preferenceâ for Trump. The CIAâs June review of the ICA found that Brennan pushed to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA.
The Steele Dossier was compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele on behalf of Fusion GPS â a research firm indirectly hired by former Secretary of State Hilary Clintonâs campaign through the law firm Perkins Coie, The Associated Press reported. The dossier has been widely discredited, including by legacy media organizations like The New York Times.
WATCH:
Moreover, Comey asserted during 2017 testimony that the Russians âinterferedâ in the 2016 election using âoverwhelming technical efforts,â saying his statements were based on âa high confidence judgment of the entire intelligence community.â
âItâs not a close call. That happened,â Comey said. âThatâs about as unfake as you can possibly get.â
However, DNI Tulsi Gabbard on Friday released a declassified file that appears to contradict Comeyâs statement.
The file shows the FBI and NSA had only âlow confidenceâ in blaming Russia for data leaks in September 2016.
âThey agree that the disclosures appear consistent with what we might expect from Russian influence activities but note that we lack sufficient technical details to correlate the information posted online to Russian state-sponsored actors,â it states.
The memo accompanying the declassified file nonetheless acknowledged âsupporting evidence indicating the Russian government directed hacking of the DNC and .â
WATCH:
Furthermore, Clapper said on CNNâs âState of the Unionâ in 2018 that Russia wanted to damage Clinton and assist Trump in the 2016 election.
But a new intelligence report Gabbard published contains declassified information showing senior intelligence community officials suppressed evidence contradicting the finding that Putin wanted Trump to beat Clinton.
The report shows Russia had intelligence that alleged Clinton was taking âheavy tranquilizersâ daily, but did not release it.
âThe judgement that Putin developed a âclear preference for candidate Trump and âaspired to help his chances of victoryâ did not adhere to the tenets of the ICD (Intelligence Community Directive) analytical standards,â according to the report.
The 2017 ICA directed by Obama found Russia had conspired to damage Clintonâs chances of victory, stating that the CIA and the FBI assessed with âhigh confidenceâ that Russia wanted to boost Trumpâs campaign.
Brennan âordered the post-election publication of 15 reports containing previously collected but unpublished intelligence, three of which were substandard â containing information that was unclear, of uncertain origin, potentially biased or implausible â and those became foundational sources for the ICA judgements that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton,â the report states.
One âscant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of these substandard reports constitutes the only classified information cited to suggest Putin âaspiredâ to help Trump win,â it states.
Brennan, Comey and Clapper did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundationâs request for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterâs byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
