Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) is taking aim at his female Republican colleagues over their support of a bill involving transgender athletes.
Swalwell shared a video of House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), flanked by several other female Republican lawmakers, speaking about the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act ā which prohibits transgender athletes from competing on certain womenās sports teams.
He labeled them a six-letter word as he wrote, āThese creeps want to invade our kidsā locker rooms.ā
āIām voting against it,ā he added.
Several Twitter users mocked the tweet.
Mike Hahn, the vice president of digital strategies for National Public Affairs, asked, āSo youāre ok with men in girlsā locker rooms?ā
https://twitter.com/mikehahn_/status/1649114715228983297
Another user, tweeted, āNo they donāt. They want to keep creepy men like you out of girls and womenās spaces including locker rooms.ā
Another person wrote, āSwalwell thinks you are a ācreepā if you wonāt let men in the locker room with your daughter.ā
https://twitter.com/Preaus/status/1649091012508422144
The conservative organization America First Works wrote, āThis sitting Congressman wants men in girlsā locker rooms but is labeling WOMEN who oppose that as the creeps. Stunning lack of self-awareness.ā
Conservative radio host Jason Rantz chimed in, āEric Swalwell wants biological men in womenās locker rooms and he calls anyone opposed a creep.ā
āEric wants biological men to decimate womenās sports, and share locker rooms with girls. Who is the creep?ā asked filmmaker Dean Cain.
In a 219-203 vote on Thursday, the House passed the legislation.
It would prohibit transgender athletes from competing on sports teams that do not correspond to their biological sex in federally funded schools.
The Hill noted the bill would not āblock transgender women and girls from training or practicing with female athletic programs āso long as no female is deprived of a roster spot on a team or sport, opportunity to participate in a practice or competition, scholarship, admission to an educational institution or other benefits.āā
It would also change Title IX, which is designed to prevent sex-based discrimination in education, to state that sex is ābased solely on a personās reproductive biology and genetics at birth.ā
It is not expected to pass the Senate.
