A lawyer for former President Donald Trump believes the conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court will âstep upâ in a major case.
Attorney Alina Habba appeared on Fox Newsâ âHannityâ Thursday night to discuss a case with major implications for the 2024 election. This week, Trump asked the Supreme Court to overturn a ruling from Coloradoâs Supreme Court that found he is ineligible to hold office again.
And Habba predicted the nationâs highest court would rule in her clientâs favor.
âI think it should be a slam dunk in the Supreme Court. I have faith in them,â she said.
Watch the video below:
Habba went on to specifically mention Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh as one of the conservative members who might rule in Trumpâs favor:
âYou know, people like Kavanaugh, who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place. Heâll step up. Those people will step up.â
Finally, she insisted the ruling will not be âbecause theyâre pro-Trump, but because theyâre pro-law because theyâre pro-fairness. And the law on this is very clear.â
Conservative commentator John Hasson shared the clip on X, formerly Twitter, and wrote, âCanât overstate how bad Trumpâs attorney is.â
ââŚthatâs a great way to force Kavanaugh to recuse himself,â he argued.
https://twitter.com/SonofHas/status/1743134148561138161
âSomeone please get her off television,â another user begged.
https://twitter.com/bonchieredstate/status/1743237393228894667
MSNBCâs Katie Phang claimed, âAlina Habba saying the quid pro quo part out loud here.â
âThis is the worst spokesperson in the history of spokespersons. HOW ON EARTH DO YOU SAY THIS ALOUD, ON TV, EVEN IF YOUâRE THINKING IT?â wrote lawyer A.J. Delgado.
In December, Coloradoâs Supreme Courtruled Trump is ineligible to appear on the ballot in the state due to his actions surrounding the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. It found he âengaged in insurrectionâ that day and was barred from holding office again due to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Trumpâs appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court argues, âThis Court should grant certiorari to consider this question of paramount importance, summarily reverse the Colorado Supreme Courtâs ruling, and return the right to vote for their candidate of choice to the voters.â