Anchor Melts Down When Navy SEAL Attacks CNN's Reporting to Her Face — Then He Responds Like This…
203 Comments
203 Comments
  • Jim Stubbs6 months ago

    Unfortunately for Miss Whatever, you're supposed to verify anonymous source information.  What she's defending is a system where it's now acceeptable to just be a mouthpieecee for someone in the woodwork with an ax to grind.

    Click to read more
    • Anonymous6 months ago

      It isn't "fake news", the proper term is "Propaganda" and its what Dr. Joseph Goebbles perfected.

      Click to read more
      44
    • Josheph6 months ago

      CNN is unfair to men: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2015/11/jameis-winston-goes-after-his-accusers.html

      Click to read more
      3
    • Cathy Barnes6 months ago

      Amen Jim Stubbs - their "anonymous sources" are just what you said they are!

      Click to read more
      3
    • Ilse Dujmovic6 months ago

      This is what they used to do in pre war Germany and other countries. Someone just makes up a story against a  citizen and pass it around, then they get hauled away  to never be seen again. If a story is true than I have no problem standing up for what I have said. 

      Click to read more
      2
  • Michael Steele6 months ago

     "Bolduan said reporters have anonymous sources all the time and protect  them so the American people can have access to important information. "  

    They call that Fake news where I come from...

    Click to read more
    • @Coach6 months ago

      The American people may want "important information" but please do not waste our time with your FAKE NEWS!

      Click to read more
      47
    • Ilse Dujmovic6 months ago

      Today's so called journalists are able to make anything up and say that comes from an anonomous source. Fair enough, but should there not be a way to verify what that source is spewing is true? Too much of that going on. How about we start making up crap about anything Democrat that walks on 2 legs. Oh, never mind we don't need to make it up. We just need to bring it out. Put it on the Enquirer or other papers that are more respectable than the NYTimes or WA Post etc

      Click to read more
      19
    • Kathy Tscheiner6 months ago

      I guess they think they are like the police.  If you cannot back up an annonymous source with credible proof, it is hogwash.

      Click to read more
      15
    • @Linlol6 months ago

      Man, CNN used to have such a great reputation but they've fallen for this democratic, liberal push to bash the President of their own United States. Do they know how low they've come when they just follow the rest of the herd? It's the herding instinct. It's not true journalism. It's voodoo journalism. They stink.

      Click to read more
      3
    • @Linlol5 months ago

      What kills me is the media will take information from people like Reality Winter and slimy Comey but they won't believe the president for whom half the American people voted for.

      Click to read more
      1
  • Wayne Barron6 months ago

    So far, not one anonymous source has been right. Stellar my ass

    Click to read more
    • tutu6 months ago

      That is correct.  They have all be full of it and they have never retracted.  I have no respect for these "stellar reporters."

      Click to read more
      22
  • allen6 months ago

    The proplem is cnn,ny times ,abc nbc and washington post are false news .

    Click to read more
  • Gahnzo6 months ago

    B as in  B.... S as in S.... anonymous sources has become the standard today.. no need to check and recheck sources. .innuendo and gossip is the law of the reporting land...

    Click to read more
    • meyou6 months ago

      Amazing how Left-Wingers will put the truth into different yoga positions, like the one where it appears one's head  seems to be growing from one's behind.  Talented little pretzels, aren't they. 

      Click to read more
      15
  • Bob Robillard6 months ago

    Wonder how often the "anonymous sources" are the products of their devious little minds?

    Click to read more
  • Bill Davis6 months ago

    More kicking and sreaming from the Childrens News Network.  Looks like she needs a time out.

    Click to read more
  • Margaret6 months ago

    QUOTE" Bolduan said reporters have anonymous sources all the time and protect them so the American people can have access to important information." UNQUOTE And so we can tell as many lies as we wish without admitting it because we can attribute it to an anonymous source.

    Click to read more
  • Chris Duvall6 months ago

    where and the hell was cnn when hilary put a private server in her basement and transfed classified docs illegally.where was cnn when the irs targeted us citizens. where was cnn with fast and furious and when attorney general lied to congress. i could go on and on i waited for them for eight years to bring all the illegal activity in our goverment when obama was prez and heard "NOTHING"

    Click to read more
    • @Cluders6 months ago

      They were still checking with "anonymous sources" who claimed she was innocent.

      Click to read more
      20
    • Alan Rhoads6 months ago

      An Open Letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions

      Dear Mr. Attorney General:

      Just as Zika Virus has entered the Continental USA, so has corruption seeped into, what used to be, an above reproach Federal Agency, the Department of Justice. Former AG Lynch and FBI Dir. Comey, both Appointees of President Obama, have apparently become the Former President’s pawns to protect a guilty felon, Hillary Rodham Clinton. It’s time to take remedial action, agree that Loretta Lynch was under President Obama’s thumb, and indict Ms. Clinton on all charges.

      Neither Dir. Comey, nor Loretta Lynch are willing to indict Ms. Clinton, and yet Dir. Comey admits to The House of Representatives that Ms. Clinton is guilty of theft, perjury, treason, and other felony charges. The Statutes do not rely on “intent” for authority to prosecute.

      Ms. Lynch had chosen to allow corruption of the Rule of Law, by allowing Ms. Clinton to be above the Rule of Law; a two-tier system, if you will. Dir. Comey even stated that if anyone did the same crimes, they would be sent to prison (my paraphrasing). This is tantamount to Obstruction of Justice. Former Madam AG, did not recuse herself so that she could remain in total control. Had she recused herself, the Deputy Attorney General would be in control, and the outcome might have been different.

      Is it possible that “Pay to Play” is happening in Madam AG's  own House? I’m not speaking of a monetary exchange (although that’s still to be determined), but rather, a new career advancement. From my perspective, that appears plausible. If Ms. Clinton is not indicted, she remains a possible candidate for POTUS. If she becomes the POTUS, there is a distinct possibility that Loretta Lynch, would be appointed by Ms. Clinton, to a Seat on the Supreme Court. If Ms. Clinton is indicted, the Supreme Court offering goes away.

      Now. What about James Comey, a Subordinate? How does he benefit? For starters, he would have kept his career, under Ms. Clinton’s POTUS watch had she been elected. Beyond that benefit, your guess is as good as mine. But we do know that Dir. Comey is a Director of a large bank, HSBC Holdings, that has donated to the Clinton Foundation. Hmmmm. And then???? We learn that Bleachbit was used to wipe clean Hillary’s private servers. Isn’t that the “Intent” that Comey, for some reason, couldn’t find to indict her? AG Jeff Sessions. You now need to indict her. {James Brien Comey was fired 10May2017, after this Open Letter was published}

      PLEASE SHARE THIS OPEN LETTER FAR AND WIDE. I SENT IT DIRECTLY TO COMEY’S AND LYNCH’S OFFICES AT THE DOJ IN SEPTEMBER; NO RESPONSE; NONE EXPECTED.

      AG Jeff Sessions

      U.S. Department of Justice

      950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

      Washington, DC 20530-0001

      FBI Dir. 

      FBI Headquarters

      935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

      Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

      Click to read more
      13
  • Gardner's Tutoring Bosqueville6 months ago

    The latest story is about a memo no reporter has seen.  Would an ethical reporter ask the source "Why can't I see the memo?"  Wouldn't a good reporter wonder if the select parts are being read verbatim?  If the context of the full memo might totally change the meaning? Nope.  No pause, no doubt, no suspicion.  It's negative, it's about Trump, don't ask questions, run it.

    Click to read more
    • Nancy Tuttle6 months ago

      And if there is a memo, can you prove WHEN it was written?

      Click to read more
      19
    • Appreciate6 months ago

      John gets his rocks off trolling others on a conservative news site on a non-stop basis and then is all offended by someone else's lack of "maturity". That's rich. (Speaking of rich, we all know why this fake story is breaking today. Globalists like John are shaking in their boots after having it proven Seth Rich -- not the Russian monster under his bed -- was the Wikileaks leaker, and lost his life for it.)

      Click to read more
      15
    • VGB6 months ago

      @Nancy Tuttle....OR who wrote it? What was their source? I think some of us out here might do a better job at reporting the news these days then these supposedly educated "news" people! While anything written on a computer DOES ahve a time stamp on it as well as an IP address can they prove no one else but the person doing the reporting is the only one who had access to it? Too many questions left open here as with most "news" these days!

      Click to read more
      11
    • John Sharpensteen6 months ago

      Anything from a computer will have a time stamp associated with it.

      Click to read more
      6
  • Jill McGlennon McCracken6 months ago

    Unnamed FORMER officials who were NOT in the Oval Office--  vs  NSA Advisor McMasters who WAS in the room, Sec of State Tillerson, who WAS IN THE ROOM-- who have gone ON RECORD saying this never happened.  WHO is more credible?  VERIFYING sources is a requirement in good journalism.  THIS is rumor mill in the cafeteria and beneath contempt.  SHAME ON YOU.  I hope to god the FCC revokes your licensing, this is NOT what is meant by the "free" press.  Free means FACTS, verification, RESPONSIBILITY-- and that is NOT happening here.  If you need to be emotional and work through your personal issues, go to therapy and keep it OFF the AIR!  SHAME ON YOU!

    Click to read more
    • @Coach6 months ago

      Where it all went wront Jill was when you wrote that verifying sources is a requirement of "good" journalism. I doubt there are any GOOD journalists left at any of THOSE networks!

      Click to read more
      16
    • VGB6 months ago

      @Coach....you took the words out of my mouth!!! Was getting ready to make sames point and looked at your comment first!  Seems "good" is the operative word here!

      Click to read more
      9
    • meyou6 months ago

      Jill, your post is written with too much clarity and logic, therefore, hush yo' mouth.

      Click to read more
      3
    • Max onceuponatime6 months ago

      jilly you're belaboring the obvious.  You'd do better (for me, america and the sharp teen trolls who frequent these sites) with that clear thinking to run for office.  It's become journalistic de rigueur to be an idiot, though come to find out many of these blowhards are actually conservative but may not even know it because their brains were never developed in a thought stimulating (vis a vis thought washing) environment; and, here's the fail safe axiom: they can't come clean for fear of losing their jobs, twittered into non-existence, so they're the closet right.   We'll take 'em all, all the while aware their coming out will take time.

      Click to read more
      1
  • Tim Bayer6 months ago

    An anonomous source told me she gave 21 guys a bj in the green room. So it must be true.

    Click to read more
  • Gary Thompson6 months ago

    Anonymous, when talking about  Trump means made up, in today's  media.

    Click to read more
  • Matthew Jacobs6 months ago

    To bad he didn't look her in the eyes and tell her to cool her jets. That display of emotion is usualy found out on the streets and should Never be found in a Professional setting.

    Click to read more
  • @AnoN1BoBbyWobby6 months ago

    Just another brain-washed Communist News Network performing like a drone in a bee-hive. Chant the mantra after me - Anon News Source Stellar CNN Reporters

    In the United States when I grew up, you had to put up or shut up when you made lying statements...

    You can't do that now, bunch of weakling honor less, gut less Libtards (Communists)

    Click to read more
  • STEPHEN O'NEILL6 months ago

    stellar reporters ?? For CNN ? She should be working at comedy central . That's better than homophobe Colbert ever came up with 

    Click to read more
  • Cory Corleone6 months ago

    I have an anon source that said that CNN colluded with the Hillary Clinton during the election by sharing debate questions, allowing candidate tailoring of stories, and generally acting like a wing of her election campaign.  Oh wait, that's not anon, but the actual email of a person inside Hillary's campaign.  Well.... I have an anon source that says Bill still gets chicks on the side (and so does Hillary).  Prove me wrong.  I'm going to start my own new organization and we'll publish anonymously sourced material all day long...since that apparently passes as new these days.

    Click to read more
  • Karen Stogner6 months ago

    Someone made a political post today on facebook that was too ridiculous to even consider it had any validity at all. Why can they make totally bogus accusations? Because facebook and Zuckerman will not stop them.

    Click to read more
  • Virginia6 months ago

    While I'm at it.. HOW DARE YOU yell at one of our Navy Seals!  You stupid, idiotiotic freak of nature.  Your "hot tip" are the voices in your head.  Take something. 

    Click to read more
  • Patrick6 months ago

    They "hide" their anonymous sources so no one knows that they just made that shit up.

    Click to read more
    • @Coach6 months ago

      Close, but you don't have to 'hide' sources that do not exist. They make stuff up, then say it came from annonymous sources so they don't have to PROVE anything. Which is what a GOOD journalist would do. 

      Click to read more
      7
    • Patrick6 months ago

      @Coach:  hey make stuff up, then say it came from annonymous sources so they  don't have to PROVE anything. Which is what a GOOD journalist would do.  

      Really??? Thats what GOOD journalists do??? I always thought that GOOD journalists reported the news with facts and no bias.

      Click to read more
      2
  • Michael Sharr6 months ago

    IT is common place to share information  with a foreign government. Every presidency has done the same when it deals with the national security of said countries. They need to build a hospital and put all you loony birds in it. NY TIMES WASHINTON POST CNN MSNBC ABC  PELOSI WATTERS WARREN SCHUMER thats where you need to be. And lady CNN is the worst of the worst and dare you attack and veteran a hero like that. You are pathetic and need to be taken down a few pegs.

    Click to read more
  • Nancy Tuttle6 months ago

    Can we call this what it is?  Smoking mirrors, throw out enough accusations to disrupt the agenda of the people.  But we deplorables are on to it, we are smart enough to see thru it.

    Click to read more
  • Geheim Nisvoll6 months ago

    " Bolduan said reporters have anonymous sources all the time and protect them so the American people can have access to important information."

    Also so they can LIE and MAKE THINGS UP and nobody can question them or oppose their version of the story. Also that.

    Click to read more
  • Tom Davidson6 months ago

    Anonymous sources should be the LAST resort to flesh out a story, not the FIRST.

    Click to read more
    • Appreciate6 months ago

      What does that matter, John? If they did you can bet you'd never hear of it on the MSM! 

      Click to read more
      5
    • Sisyphus586 months ago

      @John  So when was the last time YOU heard an anonymous source say something positive about ANYONE???

      And exactly why would anyone NEED to remain anonymous for saying something positive about another?

      In your uncontrollable desire to be combatitve/argumentative, you have once again proven my theory:  

      "Common sense isn't common."

      Click to read more
      3
    • John Sharpensteen6 months ago

      What matters is that it has NEVER happened.

      Click to read more
      -3
    • John Sharpensteen6 months ago

      Sisyphus58, the point I was trying to make is that there isn't anything positive to say about Trump. Thank you for missing the point. Now that the boulder is back on top move over so as not to get run over by the boulder on its way down. And rest assured, it is on its way down. Most of the comments on this site, both sides, proves common sense isn't common. I can neither take the credit or be given the blame for that issue. By the way my desire is controllable. There have been many comments I wanted to "unload" on but I refrained. 

      Click to read more
      -3
  • Ryan Wismer6 months ago

    The best solution to filth like this cnn news anchor is simply turn off cnn, and msnbc.  then the ratings go down.  then the advertisers depart--they have no allegience to any cause other than the dollar.  Then they fire people like her.   TURN THEM OFF.

    Click to read more
    • VGB6 months ago

      I did Ryan....haven't had them on for at least 6 years now and also left a church where preacher tired to tell me MSNBC is "BEST" news source out there! He was also telling his congregation of three thousand how to vote!  Too many people want to listen to others rather than listen to their gut instict telling them something smells bad these days....such as questioning validity of "anonymous". Any of us can say something and put the onus on a "anonymous" source. Weren't Woodward and Berstein finally outed? It is time to stop with innuendo and report just the facts! If they have an editorial to make on the facts then stand up and say these are "my words" not put them off on someone else!

      Click to read more
      4
  • @Coach6 months ago

    Is she JOKING? Stellar? Since when is FAKE NEWS considered to be "stellar" except by the lying left?

    Click to read more
    • Tactical1116 months ago

      "Stellar" in their own deluded minds and in the dumbed down, cornfused Snowflakes' minds in their "sare spaces" safe from rational thought and debate. 

      Click to read more
      2
  • Virginia6 months ago

    and.. this is why CNN has lost it's viewers and minds.  Somebody over there needs to tell them they are "reporters" not the gossip column.  All they do is TELL everyone what to think, they don't report the news.  They treat everyone like a 3 year old.

    Click to read more
  • Anonymous6 months ago

    CNN FAKE NEWS, We trun it on to so we can LOL........And by the way if any one has seen the women on all the fake news stations how they act and yell!!!!!!  Makes you wonder how the home life is and how mess up the family is.....WOW

    Click to read more
  • BlandlyUrbane6 months ago

    Most of 2017 has been anonymous.  

    Click to read more
  • Warren Miller6 months ago

    If Ms. Bolduan had a brain, she'd be arrested for smuggling crap.

    Click to read more
  • @Tess6 months ago

     The panel "devolved into shouting."  Well, that's their standard MO when they can't ANSWER THE QUESTION!

    And Bouldan's finger-pointing....love that....so professional.  

    Click to read more
  • Jeanne 6 months ago

    BOMBSHELL!!! PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS A HANGNAIL!!!! HE TRIPPED ON A BUGAR THAT HIS GRANDCHILD LEFT IN THE OVAL OFFICE!!! IMPEACH HIM IMMEDIATELY!!!! Thanks CNN.

    Click to read more
  • @Cluders6 months ago

    The MSM has anonymous "sources" so they can claim whatever they want and not be fact checked. How convenient for them.

    Click to read more
  • Kay Walsh6 months ago

    CNN is making up stories. They have lost all credibility. Anonymous sources don't count.

    Click to read more
  • @Jlynn_146 months ago

    hahahaha... love you Higbie... call em' like you see em'!  CNN is a bunch of f'n liars and will do ANYTHING for ratings!  He let that bitch have it and she couldn't take it.  Tough titties lady... you work for CNN and that's the crap you are gonna have to deal with.  You all at CNN have lied to America too many times and no one believes you anymore and then you go off the deep end like a f'n cry baby because you really can't back up what you say.  "Stellar reporter" hahahahahahaha..... that's a good one!  hahahaha! 

    Click to read more
  • Robert Bray6 months ago

    I am sure her anonymous sources were as trustworthy as Dan Rather's and Brian Williams's.

    Click to read more
    • Max onceuponatime6 months ago

      must be that bosnian sniper fire Hil spoke of - which, sympathetically, the CNN lady too experienced - resulting in drain bamage

      Click to read more
      2
  • @azyitbos6 months ago

    Whoa....I see four people that are in need of THERAPY to act more professionally; to say the least "ganging up" 4 to 1. Lib's are so fanatical they are displaying (on tape) a vitual meltdown! Keep this segment tape handy for sure!! Get a grip people. 

    Click to read more
  • @Consco6 months ago

    The MSM hasnet veified sources for years. They have all gone the route of The National Enquirer. LOL really she is going to intimidate a seal by raising her voice? Typical lib who has never served. We got yelled at daily by people we actually respected. She is just a squeaky toy

    Click to read more
  • Leslie Bryant6 months ago

    Any story that has an anonymous source is a LIE! Real stories are credible based on 2-3 named sources. The MSM which is unethical, unprofessional, unfair, unbalanced,  incompetent and rumor mongers are just making stories up!! 

    Click to read more
  • James Eldon Taylor6 months ago

    Someone get her a dictionary! She thinks that having her head so far up her ass that she sees stars means "stellar".

    Click to read more
  • Patriot6 months ago

    Carl, if you're reading this I'd like to say several things to you: 1.) Thank you for your service to this country, for every moment you put your life on the line to protect us! Patriotic Americans everywhere appreciate you and all of our military personnel who give sacrificially every day to defend this nation! 2.) I'm embarrassed and I apologize profusely to you that you endured this from other "Americans" on the Clinton News Network. They are the ones who should all be ashamed for such DEPLORABLE behavior! 3.) You were 100% right. This entire "Russian narrative" is pure BS and 98% of the country knows it. Thank you for courageously standing up for President Trump and the truth to our TRUE ENEMY, THE RADICAL LEFT.  4.) The MSM has lost ALL CREDIBILITY and you rightly told them that if they want to gain it back they need to present their sources. None of us is buying their "anonymous sources" line anymore. We know it's a LIE. 5.) The true story on RUSSIA is the mounting evidence against the Obama administration (Obama, H&B Clinton, Lynch, Rice, Comey, etc.) who are the most LAWLESS politicians this country has ever seen and who should be prosecuted for TREASON! They are the ones who make Watergate look like a walk in the park! They are the RUSSIAN SELL OUTS & LEAKERS! 6.) There is no point in arguing the truth with people like this since FACTS don't matter to them. They are fueled and driven by pride, anger, and vengeance. Don't waste your valuable time. 7.) Run for office! We need GREAT PEOPLE like you - who have integrity and who know what TRUE LEADERSHIP & SACRIFICE mean, someone who knows and loves what this country stands for - in the halls of Congress! YOU WOULD MAKE US PROUD! GOD BLESS!! 

    Click to read more
  • bro4whitebooty6 months ago

    Fo shizzle my niszzle, an anonmous sourse told me shes really a man in drag, must be true.

    Click to read more
  • Mark6 months ago

    What she and her co-workers are defending is what is referred to as gossip.

    Click to read more
  • Julie Newport6 months ago

    I'v seen annoymous in this forum plenty of times.  It's usually because they are going to say something stupid or it's a lie.  If I know something is a fact and I have the proof to back it up I'm not going to stay annoymous. 

    Click to read more
  • Sherril Williams6 months ago

    As soon as Bill Clinton took office ... he fired head of the FBI... does this jar the. Democratic. Lack of  history!

    Click to read more
  • Sherril Williams6 months ago

    Now one more thing , I wrote the NeWS for L A ch ... I could have said the Cow Jumped over The Moon ! No one checked! Now if a celebrity had a problem  we might be told to delete certain pics or goings on!!! It's all bull crap.   It is to get ratings.... period!

    Click to read more
  • Alan Rhoads6 months ago

    Mr. Higbie is correct. Whenever I read, "anonymous", it tells me that the person is nonexistent.

    Click to read more
  • John Fronk6 months ago

    If it's not true, it's probably not important.

    Click to read more
  • Audrey Williams6 months ago

    Fox is just as bad, we have the first amendment but no REAL journalists anymore.

    Click to read more
    • meyou6 months ago

      Does your provider offer One America News Network?  Great TV, great reporters!!!!!

      Click to read more
      0
  • @Fedup26 months ago

    It just seems that all of the anti Trump "news" that's being reported is from these mysterious sources. Hell, a source could be a drunk stumbling down the sidewalk for all we know. There is a full blown attack on this administration happening and it doesn't seem to end. It has to be funded by some extremely deep pockets. 

    Click to read more
  • @Dugger6 months ago

    I have ananonymous sources that everyone at CNN worships satan and eats human flesh. BOOM! Fact!

    Click to read more
  • tutu6 months ago

    BOOM!  Every accused person has the right to face thier accuser.  Bunch of cowards.  

    Oh and, "steller CNN reporters,"  that makes me laugh my fanny off.  

    Click to read more
  • Ed Ganley6 months ago

    Unbelievable how CNN sticks by their sources. These sources have nothing to hide if they are telling the truth. CNN is a network of lies. They know that there are many out there the buy into their lies, so they think "why not keep lying to the public" CNN loves the ill informed, but it will all come out one day that CNN is a lying News Show. 

    Click to read more
  • zimmy6 months ago

    An anonymous source told me that a certain female anchor on CNN likes to be spanked. .... must be true.

    Click to read more
  • Ken Wade6 months ago

    Anonymous source, imaginary friend what's the difference?

    Click to read more
  • Cc6 months ago

    Lol lol lol!!!!! Can you say anymore? Good Lord no. 

    Click to read more
  • HAL HOFFMAN6 months ago

    She is confusing them with imaginary sources that CNN uses!  YOU CANNOT QUESTION IMAGINARY SOURCES......CAN YOU?  stellar?????  maybe in their own minds!!!

    Click to read more
  • @franseaaz6 months ago

    I don't believe anonymous either.  That's utter BS.  It is, however, amazing how many gullible people out there believe BS.

    Click to read more
  • Larry Allen Davis Sr.6 months ago

    CNN FAKE FUCKING. 

    Click to read more
  • Steven Lehar6 months ago

    She's a pretty stellar role model of the Clinton News Network herself! 

    Click to read more
  • Angie Ellis6 months ago

    How do the people know if  an anonymous source is not a made up source or simply someone with an unverifiable opinion that they are stating as a fact?  I just want to know how far the media who releases this information go to verify that the information is factual? Who else do they check with?  Or is this "anonymous source" simply a means to side step any verification at all?  There is no way to fact check this, is there?  It occurs to me that this could be like a smoke bomb which has no fire, but because there smoke there must be fire.  That would be their reasoning.  There are things other than smoke which can set off an alarm and again fire is not involved.  This is my analogy of using anonymous sources without any means of verifying the truth of the allegations.  

    Click to read more
  • Kathy Tscheiner6 months ago

    It's disgusting to see how they treat someone who comes on their show.  These "news" people are downright mental cases.   They need to be locked up where the sun does not shine.

    John- that's the problem, these are not facts the media nuts are presenting.  If you tried to try a case on this it would be thrown out.  The media should be more responsible, but sadly they are just a joke anymore.  They  pull in gullible people like you into their nets.

    Click to read more
  • Pat Carfagno6 months ago

    The profession of prostitution is more honest than journalism.

    Click to read more
  • @Chantel6 months ago

    The panel is missing the point.  Trump, and every other President, including former President Obama, can share any information, sensitive or not, with anyone they deem appropriate.  It may not be prudent, but it is legal.  So, really, it isn't news.  

    Click to read more
  • Donna braun6 months ago

    Now is when you need to expose your sources you have no proof on the table and people no longer trust ALOT of news sources.  THESE PEOPLE COULD SELL THIS INFO OFF FOR ALOT OF MONEY WHY BOTHER TO GOVE IT TO YOU FOR FREE

    Click to read more
  • Darrell Kissick6 months ago

    With CNN the anonymous sources are the hot air blowing out of their ASSES

    Click to read more
  • Sharon Redmon6 months ago

    hearsay!!!hearsay!!!!  Clinton fired his FBI director  and so did Obama......Women shut up

    Click to read more
  • Thomas Ott6 months ago

    Hey, CNN and anchor Kate Bolduan . . .

    According to an “ANONYMOUS SOURCE:” 

    Prior to leaving office on January 20, 2017, President Obama called FBI Director James Comey into the Oval Office. President Obama asked Director Comey to make Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office an absolute living hell and to do anything that besmirches President Trump's character.


    Of course, the above GARBAGE is FAKE NEWS generated by a FAKE ANONYMOUS SOURCE.


    I voted for Donald Trump, and I support President Trump. I will give him an opportunity to lead our country, because giving the president an opportunity to succeed -- equates to giving our country an opportunity to succeed.

    Bottom line, I support America FIRST. Therefore, if I had any SOLID EVIDENCE or PROOF Mr. Trump is subverting our Constitution or committing – treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors – I would NOT remain in the shadows, and I definitely would NOT remain anonymous! 

    As an American, I would immediately present my proof to Congress, and let the chips fall where they may. I would do this because my loyalty is to AMERICA. My loyalty is not bound to a person or political party – Republican, Democrat or Independent.

    Ms. Bolduan, would YOU accept information from any ANONYMOUS SOURCE making claim your husband was “under suspicion” at The Carlyle Group for misappropriating investment funds? Would you demand that so-called anonymous source to come forward and present their proof publically, or would you accept harmful conjecture from that anonymous source?

    You see, Ms. Bolduan, lies and conjecture is a dark street filled with turns of speculation and uncertainty. However, PROOF delivered openly and beyond the shadow of a doubt is the most reliable and accurate road to travel. 

    Grow up, Ms. Bolduan. Your loyalty should be with America – not with CNN, which is a politically biased and agenda-based news organization. By the way -- CNN is playing you like a Stradivarius.

    Click to read more
  • Shaun Dudash6 months ago

    What they don't  disclose is for an extra $20 their anonymous spurce will give you a reach around.

    Isn't odd how no one at the white house or at the meeting can confirm that one of the reporters even spoke to anyone at the white house.

    Click to read more
  • Kevin Frances6 months ago

    CNN is full of crap. End of Story!

    Click to read more
  • jabberjaw996 months ago

    CNN embarrasses itself everyday. 

    Click to read more
  • Bobby6 months ago

      I personally, don't necessarily, disbelieve what these anonymous sources are saying.  It's more like, I actually don't believe that they exist.  

    A “stellar reporter”, with an agenda, makes up a story that he wants people to believe.  He throws in a few quotes from some anonymous sources.  Now everyone has to believe it.  It has been sourced.  He may even call it a trusted source.  After all who doesn’t trust them self?  He could be even more creative and talk to “sources close to the white house”.  You know, that guy with the picket sign on Pennsylvania Ave. 

    Click to read more
  • Jeffrey Moore6 months ago

    One of the women in the video said, "What Trump supporters are doing is they're trying to make regular people who don't understand how this works think that just some random person called up a journalist and told him something."

    If that's what Trump supporters are doing, they're failing.  Because I don't believe that.  I believe the "journalists" made it up, just like they made up all their other lies, from "Michael Brown was just a nice guy minding his own business" to polls that showed Hilary would win in a landslide to "Islam is a religion of peace" to "the ACA gave 20 million people health care" to "sanctuary cities keep innocent people from being deported and keep families together" to "Christians are haters" to made-up terms like "Islamophobe" and "homophobe" for sensible people who don't want terrorism or perversions here in America, and "undocumented immigrant" for illegal aliens.  And they change the meanings of words, like "gay" used to mean "happy;" "discriminate" used to mean "tell the difference" or "differentiate;" and "rights" used to be something you were allowed to do, not something someone else was required to do for you.

    If "journalists" want to be credible, they need to bring out their sources and report the news, not opinions.  Citing an anonymous source is just another way of saying the "reporter" made it up, i.e., it's a lie.

    Click to read more
  • @Alexthefishguy6 months ago

    tRump is the biggest LIAR out there...just look at his smile and you can tell... believe me... ?

    Click to read more
  • Derra Ball6 months ago

    If stellar means space cadets, then yah, CNN is stellar.

    Click to read more
  • Loves America6 months ago

    I guess most of today's reporters never had to write a report in school.  I remember that when I got information on my topic, I had to make notations, footnotes, and any other "notes" that I am sure I have fogotten, all to lend credence and honesty to my reports.    All of these fake news reporters need to go back to report writing 101...just saying.

    Click to read more
  • Mary Allen6 months ago

    CNN is a lying bunch of trump haters. all mainstream media uses same fake sources and all repeat the same montra. New York times and washington post has been proven to lie many times.   They look for crap to say about crap.  Every person in the room said this was false reporting and yet the media still run with this.  There is no journalism. No one verifies any lie they put out.  it is sad.

    Click to read more
  • Mary Allen6 months ago

    oh dont dare attack stellar reporters while they crucify the president of the United States trying to advance anarchy

    Click to read more
  • Linda Diane6 months ago

    Many of these news channels have lost their way, no ethics or integrity, just a story to get ratings.  That's all it's about any more.....ratings.

    Click to read more
  • Maria Szalai 6 months ago

    Since i have been witness to  too many lies on CNN . I don't trust them anymore . Many times they quoted Trump and they always leaved essential words out of the speech and that changed the whole meaning of what he was saying . That's not what journalism suppose to be . I hate it when they put a spin on everything . Yesterday after the so called accident in New York ( i don't believe it was an accident )  CNN was still bashing Trump , instead of reporting what was going on in New York . 

    Click to read more
  • Dean Erdman6 months ago

    Seems to me CNN has been spot on.

    Click to read more
  • Carol Keller6 months ago

    What if I said I was standing in a corner of the room, I never left as instructed by the president, and when he and Comey were discussing Flynn, the president got so upset that he kicked Comey in the shins?

    Click to read more
  • Salty Seahorse6 months ago

    There are not enough words to describe the irretrievably uniformed and 'never to be critical thinkers' of Trumpov supporters. 

    I used to think that I weep for the future.ow, I cry buckets for the present. 

    Trump is a malignant narcissist.  And maybe a term the you may relate to: Man Child.

    May all of the Gods bless us and save us.

    Click to read more
  • Anonymous6 months ago

    I often wonder how to get on the CNN msm committee that makes this crappola up...all the while ignoring real news, like the Seth Rich business...

    Just to go off topic a bit. I hope everyone has noticed that Sharpensteen never posts, and only makes his snarky comments to others posts. I got to wondering why, and all I could come up with was that he has no original thoughts of his own, and just snarks whatever he is told to.

    Click to read more
  • Beatriz6 months ago

    Bunch of hissing vipers they are lovers of what is wrong and crooked, like their idol.

    Click to read more
  • Gary Lackey6 months ago

    Their anonymous sources this past year have been as accurate as the half dozen women these same media shills paraded as being violated by Trump.  Where are those women?  They ignore and downplay the more believable women that accuse Bill Clinton yet of the dozen women that they use against Trump are... MIA.  It is hard to believe these Fake News outlets when they have nothing to back their claims except "heresay."

    Click to read more
  • Lois Shofstahl6 months ago

    CNN  lies lies lies

    Click to read more
  • David Johnson6 months ago

    I don't know but if I was the "anonymous source" and I felt my country was being put in jeopardy by some thing like this I would have no problem comming foward and letting everyone know exactly what I heard. What exactly are they protecting this source from? Just doesn't make any sense if you think about it. Like Judge Judy say's if it doesn't make sense, it's not true.

    Click to read more
  • Maureen Anderson6 months ago

    I'm with Carl - especially noteworthy is his knowledge of 'after action'.  One anchor out of five seems to have a brain that is not washed by political rhetoric. Perfect example of why CNN is not even on my radar. Carl perhaps you can get a job at FOX - you would dovetail nicely with their lineup. 

    Click to read more
  • John McGowan6 months ago

    Looks like the SEAL can hold his own. Hats off, those guys are sharp.

    Click to read more
  • Eli Allore6 months ago

    Didn't anonymous sources have to be supported by two other sources to be considered valid? 

    Click to read more
  • Peter B6 months ago

    so kirsten finally went over to cnn. good. she was such a hack when she was with fox. btw the melt down by these idiots is entertaining. they always hide behind the "anonymous" sources to propagate fake news all the time. no surprise there. Turmp did NOT say he shared "classified information." what surprises me is that that navy seal guy did not bash that black dude's face in when he yepped his mouth off, sitting 6 inches from him.

    Click to read more
  • Charles V6 months ago

    Anonymous ...  Kinda like ANTIFA!  I do not believe anyone who hides behind either!  These days the Democrats will sling ANYTHING against the wall, just to see if it sticks!  He is absolutely right and she is a biatch....  

    Click to read more
  • Theresa Whetstine6 months ago

    The Difference is that Hillary has never been President of the USA.

    Donald Trump is the President of the USA.  

    There is comparing the two in the handiling of sensitive materials.

    Click to read more
  • Gerri6 months ago

    It's about time someone puts the pressure on the "stellar" reporters!

    Click to read more
  • Tony Orlando6 months ago

    CNN is a shithole of biased idiots.   

    Click to read more
  • Paula6 months ago

    Higbie is a brave retired Navy Seal and put his life on the line for our country, all of us.

     CNN's bolden is reckless, cowardly, sneaky, unprofessional and invalid. Someone with more credibility should replace her.

    Click to read more
  • Rick Oringel6 months ago

    What is sad is that the fake news clowns at CNN really take themselves seriously. They have no journalistic skills and do not permit opposing views unless they stack the group with angry blacks. Some of the angry women would scare the WWE stars because they are loud and disgusting.

    Click to read more
  • Christopher Chance6 months ago

    Anonymous sources are a crooked reporters license to LIE! And that is exactly what they do. Anonymous sources should be illegal.

    When someone goes to court over a report from an AS, it is illegal they have a Constitutional right to confront their accusers. I know it is rare that this happens, but as I said it gives less than credible reporters Carte Blanche to outright lie and claim an AS.

    They should be outlawed in media, like he said let them face the camera. It would never happen because half the time there is no AS, it's just fake reporting like CNN is famous for. 

    Click to read more
  • Caroline Beasley Sharpe6 months ago

    I'll bet they have polls showing, you can't trust someone who was Actually in the room over two anonymous sources! That's just ? crazy! And by the way, which Ever person gets the angriest and bellows at the voice of reason, wins the argument !?? Comedy at its Best!

    Click to read more
  • Jay Smite6 months ago

    CNN FAKE NEWS ??? no crimes have been committed no proof you idiotic liberal nut jobs!! Get your facts straight you make America sick God Bless President Trump ??????

    Click to read more
  • tacticomp6 months ago

    That's the Modus Operandi of these Leftist Partisan Hacks Diguising as "Journalists" in the Fake media!

    They are ELITIST group thinkers! who has this superiroty complex over everybody else!  

    Click to read more
  • Tactical1116 months ago

    Laughable considering they just got outed for two more FAKE NEWS LIES;  1. Acting FBI Director wanted to quit; 2. Comey was denied resources for the "RussiaGate" investigation. Hilarious that they think this is "good journalism". In reality they know they are in a coreographed False Narrative to bring the Trump Administration down because the Banksters, Corpo Media, and Corrupt Politicians like the Clintonistas are scared as hell that an honest American is the President.  

    Click to read more
  • Tactical1116 months ago

    Did you get that it was "two FORMER OFFICIALS close to the WH"?  How the hell would FORMER OFFICIALS even get in the room to hear what was said??? This is histerical and that's why they get so pissed when their BULLSHIT is confronted.  

    Click to read more
  • Jay Love6 months ago

    These people were brain dead for 8 years under the Obama/Clinton debacle, and as soon as Trump won the election its all hands on deck? 

    Click to read more
  • Sisyphus586 months ago

    Awwww, she just needs a hug...the poor little snowflake!!!

    Click to read more
  • Cathy Barnes6 months ago

    Thank you Carl for standing up to "psycho Kate Bolduan". If they're so "STELLAR" why can't she control herself. She acted like a pit bull on a chain going for the juglar. She's lucky that it was Carl's face she was shouting into because he's got a lot of self-control. Had it been me, I would have rearranged her grill for her!

    Click to read more
  • Ken Cucchi6 months ago

    Never any proven facts just acusations.

    Click to read more
  • Christian Kurth6 months ago

    Dr Goebbels would have loved CNN. They would have been the chosen network in the Third Reich. Constant 24 hours a day of fake news and propaganda. 

    Click to read more
  • Suzanne Vale6 months ago

    These CNN clowns make crap up as they go along that is not what he said you are total liars and you should be ashamed

    Click to read more
  • @naturo6 months ago

    The Navy Seal should stick to combat. The only way to get and keep getting info is through anominity until they need to testift. No anominity no more info given. Very simliar to the muslim community. You want trerrorists and communication. Let ppl remain anonymous. 

    Click to read more
  • Kathy LaFave6 months ago

    And listen you Liberal idiots Hillary shared plenty of classified information in all her emails so where is the uproar on all that ?????????? Screw ya'll with your double standards !!

    Click to read more
  • Anonymous6 months ago

    SO he has the balls to tell it like it is and then CUNTS and NIGGERS have to mouth off. Fuck'em one and ALL !!!

    Click to read more
  • @lucia6 months ago

    If an anonymous source is telling CNN etc about what was said in a closed meeting, a leaker? and isn't that illegal?? 

    Click to read more
  • @Knifemaker6 months ago

    I've got an anonymous source hangin'.

    Click to read more
  • Michael E. Coyle6 months ago

    Phfluck these leftist twats and media pricks and their opinions.   These people can stick their opinions and fake news up their stinking keisters.  I have no interest and don't give a total damn about who the phfluck they are, what they say, who they work for.  I don't give these shits my time at all.  I listen to Conservative Talk Radio like Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, Mike Gallagher, Dennis Prager,  Shawn Hannity, Larry Elder, Herman Cain. I will watch Fox News on occasion and agree with them a lot on what they discuss.  Screw the rest of the Leftist Liberal Media Limp Organs.

    Click to read more
  • Franklin Stevenson6 months ago

    In my journalistic training, the fundamental standard for news reporting is that, if you cannot name or quote your source (i.e., your source speaks to you on condition of anonymity) then you cannot use or reference that information in your story, as your reporting is unable to be corroborated, verified, and your source is unaccoutnable for the information.  The value of "anonymous sources" is properly professionally limited to pointing you to further investigation that may develop sources that can be named or quoted.  Most of the "mainstream media" needs to go back to classic journalism school if they want to regain any credibility for "reporting the news", which involves stepping away from journalistic activism parading as news reporting.

    Click to read more
  • Dave Schwartz6 months ago

    [This comment was deleted.]

  • Dave Schwartz6 months ago

     These people are a complete embarrassment.  They don't care that they emarass themselves.  What a bunch of losers.   "Trump said he shared information".  So fucking what.  He didn't share classified information, the people in the meeting even said it.  These people should be fired immediately.  You asshole Libs need to read up on sharing information with countries with whom we have common enemies.  GFY.

    Click to read more
  • Leonard Wood6 months ago

    CNN is horrid.  They do nothing but lie.  

    Click to read more
  • AST6 months ago

    Anonymous, un-named sources say, or it is classified ...  Then, after the damage is done, MSM (in small print) retracts or corrects the fake news.

    http://leftandrightarewrong.com/russia-and-trump-and-fake-news/

    Click to read more
  • @BamaJama6 months ago

    Scoundrels that wrap themselves in the "we are above reproach" mantle fool only themselves.   One rotten reporter can  lie about even having a source.  There is no check or balance on , reporters or their sources. It's not like  it hasn't happened before. 

    Click to read more
  • @n1snipe6 months ago

    Which Hunt, Highly Sensative Info Given, oh PLEASE. CNN at it's worst! Two faced hacks. Jan 2017 addition of NYP printed exact same info that CNN is calling Trump a traitor for. MSM is using other MSM fake sourses and their supposed knowledgable sources.

    Click to read more
  • Linda Shirey6 months ago

    It's so convincing to have 3 people shout at someone for not believing 'anonymous sources' who don't want to come out and be named, and then drag in Whitewater as a reference point. Just stating over and over 'Trump admitted to sharing information with Russians' is about as telling a point as saying 'Hillary Clinton shared information over a server'. That's interesting, but hardly news. It's odd that people will shout over Trump's ability - as a President - to share information with another country's leaders....and then expect not to have Hillary Clinton's inappropriate usage of classified information quoted back to them. If Russia had information, it's quite possible that some of the leaks could trace back to Hillary's lack of concern about informational safety. Where is the dialogue about Hillary's contempt for her country?

    Click to read more
  • Samuel Green5 months ago

    They cannot name the source of the Trump and the commies because Barack Osama Bin Obama's team choas made the whole thing up.

    This seal is a hero off camera and on camera.  Good for him for expressing his views on the truth.  CNN needs to stop MAKING the news and start REPORTING IT FAIRLY.   

    CNN is the only station in my house that's blocked, as they are to agenda based and propaganda isn't my thing.

    Click to read more
  • Gary Bear Millsaps4 months ago

    Anonymous sources tell me that there is a Dominion plot to travel back in time, sow chaos in Earth's politics in order for us to never develop warp drive technology, meet the Vulcans, and found the Federation.

    Click to read more