I first read all these comments, and thought to sum my response up in 2 letters F U. This attack was horrible as was and is every attack on the innocents. These people are as innocent as the ones prior in london and around the world. You cant have selective outrage to terrorism. And if you do, youre as stupid as the people doing it.
Great Britton has had to deal with almost one attack a week...it it long past time to send people into mosques to find the Imams who are preaching Jihad....those Imams need to be arrested and locked up....solitary confinement to prevent further radicalization efforts.
I realize that Islamist Extermists have declared war on all non-Muslims.....they have vowed to KILL ALL INFIDELS......Europe is becoming their first major battle sight......
It is possible they are reluctant to start here in the US because of the number of citizens who own and are proficient with firearms. Prior to WW11, the Japanese Emperor noted that Japan could never win on US soil because "There is a gun behind EVERY BLADE of GRASS"!
Islam started in the Middle East. The Crusades (if you went to school in the last twenty years you didn't learn this) were a Christian invasion of the Mid-East to stop the Muslim World Caliphate from conquering the known world of Europe and Asia. America had not yet been discovered. Islam was mostly confined to the Mid-East and parts of Asia. Fast forward 2000 years to today. Muslims are again trying to form a World Caliphate by the simple expedient of killing all non-Muslims. They have expanded throughout the mid-East, killing in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Libya, and moving into Africa to kill there. They are now into Asia and Europe, and across the English Channel into Britain, killing there also. President Trump tried to ban them from the U.S. but was overridden by U.S. Circuit Courts, who claim that citizens of foreign countries have the same Constitutional Rights as U.S. citizens, despite not living here or taking the lawful steps necessary to become U.S. citizens. (It's not at issue here, but how could Trump "conspire" with Russians who have the same Constitutional Rights we have as stated by U.S. appeals Courts?) The point of this comment is that Muslims are here, by order of the U.S. Federal courts. Do you think they will not kill here? Oh, my mistake, they already have! Do you think they'll stop if we ask them nicely? What's your opinion?
I watched a live interview last night with a younger man who was at the scene and witnessed the entire event, including the capture of the one individual. The news interviewer specifically asked the man if the captured driver said anything while he was being held, waiting on police. His response was "no, he didn't say anything". He repeated that. Now this article is claiming the guy shouted a statement of intent. "You guys deserve this". Hmm? Who's telling the truth?
OH,SURE. Now hat the muslims are getting attacked it's a "TERRORIST ATTACK THAT WON'T BE TOLERATED" SAYS THE Muslim Mayor. But when it was the Christians attacked by Muslims then it was something that "we had to get used to"...! Face it. It was payback given to the Muslims in this "one fed up Brit's" mind. So How do they like it???
Of course running people over with cars is wrong, however, Prime Minister May, look at the difference in the crowd response before you condemn the attacker. When Muslims attack non-muslims, there is an out pouring of sympathy for the victims. On this attack, what did the Muslim crowd do? They tried to stomp the life out of the attacker. They are NOT your friends...send them all back where they came from...they want to live in the stone age, let them.
This is exactly what happens when the government does nothing to protect its citizens and allows and protects “Refugees” that are committing crimes against them. Remember, ISIS said they will infiltrate the refugees and attack us in our own countries. You can call them innocent if you want to, but the Muslim community knows who the radicals are and are doing nothing about it. That makes them all just as guilty. Innocents, what a funny word. If you know someone that is going to kill people and you do nothing about it, are you not just as guilty?
Maybe the Muslim community better use this as a wakeup call. If, and I use that term loosely, there are any peaceful Muslims, it’s time to round up your radicals and turn them in before more of you are “Mowed” over again. The kids at the concert were innocent victims. They were not hurting anyone or planning any attacks. They were not solders or a part of any political party. They had no agenda but to have a good time. That’s what innocents looks like to me.
What I am wondering and perhaps someone can give me an answer. It is against the law to view or have in possession child pornography on one's computer and the perpetrator is charged with the crime. Why can't our government make the same law for those accessing radical Islam sites or at least accessing information to build a bomb or commit a terrorist attack? If not allowing perverts to access child porongraphy is a crime why can't it be the same with radical Islam propaganda and plans on how to commit a terrorist attack. To me this would give the government the right to at least detain suspects in their sites sometime to prevent the suspect from carrying out the attack and investigate where the information is coming from and who else is involved in the circle.