Facebook Announces Steps to Clamp down on Misinformation Ahead of 2020 Election

Carlos Jasso/Reuters

Facebook has announced steps to combat misinformation and voter suppression ahead of the November 2020 U.S. presidential election, on the same day it disclosed the removal of a network of Russian accounts targeting U.S. voters on Instagram.

Facebook said on Monday it would increase transparency through measures such as showing more information about the confirmed owner of a Facebook page and more prominently labeling content that independent fact-checkers have marked as false.

The social media giant has come under fire in recent weeks over its policy of exempting ads run by politicians from fact-checking, drawing ire from Democratic presidential candidates Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren.

Last week, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg defended the policy, saying social media had introduced transformative avenues for speech that should not be shut down.

That same day, the Biden campaign called for the removal of an ad run by a super PAC campaign group, not a politician, that it said contained false claims about the former vice president.

Katie Harbath, Facebook’s head of global elections policy, said in response that if the now inactive ad ran again, it would be sent to Facebook’s third-party fact-checkers.

On Monday, Facebook said would be putting into effect its planned ban on paid ads that tell people in the United States not to vote. Zuckerberg told reporters on a conference call that the ban on voter misinformation would also apply to ads run by politicians.

The company will start labeling state-controlled media on its page and in the site’s ad library. In a blog post, Facebook said it planned to expand this labeling to specific posts on both Facebook and Instagram early next year.

Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, the video-streaming service of Alphabet’s Google, all recently came under scrutiny after showing ads from Chinese state-controlled media that criticized Hong Kong protesters.

This month, the Senate committee investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election said that the Kremlin’s best-known propaganda arm increased its social media activity after that vote.

“The bottom line here is that elections have changed significantly since 2016 and Facebook has changed too.” Zuckerberg said on Monday.

“We face increasingly sophisticated attacks from nation states like Russia, Iran and China, but I’m confident we’re more prepared.”

Theories that China has interfered in U.S. elections are absurd and laughable, said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Tuesday.

If someone says China interfered in the U.S. election, they should provide proof, said Hua. China has never had any interest in interfering with other countries’ internal affairs, she said.

Moscow and Tehran have also repeatedly denied the allegations.

Facebook will introduce a new U.S. presidential candidate spend tracker to show how much they have spent on political ads as part of the company’s efforts to make its ad library easier to use, Zuckerberg said.

Facebook launched an online library of political ads in 2018, but the database has been criticized by researchers as being poorly maintained and failing to provide useful ad targeting information.

The company plans to heighten protection of the Facebook and Instagram accounts of candidates, elected officials and their teams through a program called Facebook Protect. Participants in the program will be required to turn on two-factor authentication and their accounts will be monitored for signs of hacking.

(Reporting by Elizabeth Culliford; Additional reporting by Gabriel Crossley; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Alison Williams)

What do you think?

Comments

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Phoenix
Member

James… maybe you should really check out Facebook. An IJR article on this site may get 5 comments. On Facebook it will get well over 500 comments. Most IJR readers are probably on Facebook.

General Confusion
Member

““Liberal bias” in social and corporate media is already well documented and based in fact.” Confused James

You need less confusing sources of ideas.

“Anyone who relies on the children’s gossip site “Fakebook” for political information is looking for slanted, one-sided BS.” Confused James

Did you ever ask, I don’t know, your grandchildren where they look for social media connections with their friends? If you had, you would be less confused. I would be highly surprised if they even have a Facebook account let alone use it as a prime medium. Facebook now is mostly for older people.

General Confusion
Member

“it would be sent to Facebook’s third-party fact-checkers” Article

If anyone thinks that social media or corporate media had a liberal bias, in general, y’all are confused. The fall for the conservative trap and kowtow to their pressure every time.

Facebook even uses The Daily Caller as one of its third-party fact checkers. THAT is just unconscionable!

Loading…

0

Comments

0 comments

Target Slashes Employees’ Hours After Raising Its Minimum Wage to $15 An Hour

Democratic 2020 Hopeful Warren Still Weighing Medicare for All Financing Options