First Court Test Arrives in Trump-US House Showdown Over Probes

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

A federal court for the first time on Tuesday will step into the intensifying clash between the U.S. House of Representatives and President Donald Trump, who is stonewalling multiple probes led by House Democrats of himself and his businesses.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington will hear oral arguments on whether Mazars LLP, Trump’s long-time accounting firm, must comply with a House Oversight Committee subpoena seeking financial records for Trump and his company.

In an aggressive response to congressional oversight, Trump is refusing to cooperate with any of the probes. Their targets range from his tax returns and policy decisions to his Washington hotel and his children’s security clearances.

The House Oversight Committee claims sweeping investigative power and says it needs Trump’s financial records to examine whether he has conflicts of interest or broke the law by not disentangling himself from his business holdings as previous presidents did.

Lawyers for Trump and the Trump Organization, his company, last month filed a lawsuit to block the committee’s subpoena, saying it exceeded Congress’ constitutional limits.

Trump’s lawyers argued that Congress is on a quest to “turn up something that Democrats can use as a political tool against the president now and in the 2020 election.

On Monday, the Republican president’s attorneys objected to Mehta’s plan to fast-track the lawsuit by holding a trial on Tuesday, saying that would deny Trump a “full and fair” hearing.

Either way, Mehta will likely issue a written decision at a later date, although he may indicate on Tuesday how he intends to rule. Whatever the outcome, his ruling will almost certainly be appealed to a higher court.

Mehta was appointed in 2014 by former Democratic President Barack Obama, who was investigated almost non-stop by Republicans in Congress during his two terms in office.

Mazars has avoided taking sides in the dispute and said it will “comply with all legal obligations.”

Trump’s challenge of the Mazars subpoena was his first effort to quash the multiple House inquiries. He has also sued over subpoenas for his financial records sent to Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp.

Some legal experts have said Trump’s lawsuits are unlikely to succeed. They said Congress has broad power to issue subpoenas, so long as documents requested can help it legislate, and that courts are reluctant to second-guess its motivations.

Some Democratic Party leaders have argued that Trump’s stonewalling represents a “constitutional crisis” and could force them to begin impeachment proceedings to remove him from office, even though such an effort would likely fail in the Republican-controlled Senate.

(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Dan Grebler)

What do you think?

-4 pledges
Upvote Downvote

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Michael D. Rininger
Member

Demonrats are on a fishing expedition ,nothing more ,nothing less. They know their days are numbered and are only looking for anything that they can find to try and smear the President before he is re-elected in 2020

Friend
Member

You’re close: The Trump adiministration is looking to play out the clock with court challenges to House suponeas, until after the 2020 election, and a new Congress has to start over with it’s investigations. As for fishing expeditions, Trump’s business dealings, in and out of the White House have been very fishy.

James
Member

Trump’s financial records are none of their business – except for political reasons. The majority – if not all – don’t have the brains to figure out his organizational structure or goals.

Friend
Member

Does DJT have the brains to figure out his organizational structure or goals? Judging by the massive amounts of money he has lost in the past, probably not.

General Confusion
Member

Holy crap! A friend who ISN’T confused!

This is exciting.

Dan McMonigle
Member

Obama was “investigated nonstop”. Get real. There were nonstop reasons to investigate him and his embedded cronies. But no one was on task. So now we face Russian missiles upgraded with American uranium, terrorists financed with US dollars and the consequences of terrible trade and national security deals that made crooked Democrats rich at the expense of the American people.

Friend
Member

Ah, the persistant right-wing Republican urban myth that US uranium was sold to Russia. Russia has long been an exporter of uranium! It build some 70,000 nuclear devices, with uranium it mined, refined, and enriched, plus a few thousand more nuclear power plants. Selling uranium to Russian would be coals to Newcastle! As for financing terrorists, look to our ally Saudi Arabia for that; the Saudi Royals have been buying off radical Islamists since 1979, with $ billions.

richard
Member

The Demorats are just unhappy that Mueller’s report did not give them what they wanted. So now they are trying a new tact. If this does not work who knows what they will try next. What a bunch of spoiled brats.

Otis
Member

Much ado about nothing.

TOM
Member

This is not “much ado about nothing”. This is very much about if Congress has the authority to subpoena records of an individual without evidence of a crime. President Trump was a private individual during the time that these records are sought. This should be very disturbing to every citizen because once the door is opened any government agency could use this decision as the basis to go fishing in anyone’s business, including yours.

Alabama Senate to Vote on Bill Banning Abortion

Cruz Slams the ‘Freshman Trio’ After Tlaib’s Controversial Holocaust Remark: ‘They’re Horrifying’