Gabbard Claims She Might Boycott Next 2020 Dem Debate Because the DNC Is ‘Rigging the Election’

REUTERS/Scott Audette/File Photo

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) made known on Thursday that she may not be attending the next 2020 Democratic primary debate as a boycott.

Making the announcement via Twitter, Gabbard said that she is “seriously considering” boycotting the upcoming debate on October 15 because “the [Democratic National Committee] and corporate media are rigging the election.”

“The 2016 Democratic Primary election was rigged by the DNC and their partners in the corporate media against Bernie Sanders. In this 2020 election, the DNC and the corporate media are rigging the election again, but this time against the American people in the early voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada.

They are attempting to replace the roles of voters in the early states, using polling and other arbitrary methods which are not transparent or democratic, and they’re holding so-called debates which really are not debates at all but rather commercialized reality television meant to entertain, rather to inform or enlighten.”

Gabbard added, “In short, the DNC and corporate media are trying to hijack the entire election process.”

Watch the video below:

As Gabbard considers a boycott of the October debate, she didn’t make the cut for the last debate following donor requirements and polling numbers being doubled by the DNC. The third debate held on September 12 in Houston, Texas, had 10 of the presidential hopefuls vying for the Democratic presidential nomination spot.

Gabbard, however, is among 11 others who qualified for the debate on October 15 in Ohio.

The fifth debate held on November 20 also has a higher donation and polling number requirement, which eight of the candidates have qualified for so far. Some of those who did qualify include former Vice President Joe Biden (D), Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). Candidates have until November 13 at midnight to meet the requirement.

What do you think?

6
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Screwtape
Member

While I disagree with many of Rep. Gabbard’s policies she is the most sane of those still viable. Boycotting the next round of debates would be counter-productive to her own campaign, denyng her exposure and the opportunity to make her points.

Now if Hillary makes a 3rd run……

Chrissy
Member

Tulsi Gabbard is correct. 2016 was promised to Hillary Clinton and she got it, despite the “democratic” process. 2020 is already promised to someone, this is just a dog and pony show. I’m sure it’s unnerving for those not established in the Deep State to see what really goes on. Don’t be surprised if the names Clinton and Obama are in there somewhere.

Phyllis Softa
Member

Make America SANE Again.

FILE PHOTO: House Appropriations Subcommittee Chairwoman Nita Lowey (D-NY) speaks during testimony by U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at a hearing on the State Department's budget request for 2020 in Washington, U.S. March 27, 2019. REUTERS/Erin Scott

U.S. House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita Lowey to Retire From Congress

Biden Warns Democrats Not to Let Trump ‘Pick the Democratic Nominee’ as He Faces Wave of Ukraine Attacks