US Judge to Consider Bid to Block Trump’s Emergency Border Wall Funds

Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters

U.S. President Donald Trump’s national emergency declaration to divert more than $6 billion to build a wall on the border with Mexico will face its first test in court on Friday, when states and advocacy groups are expected to ask a federal judge to block the funding.

At the center of Friday’s hearing is the question of the president’s authority to construct a wall using funds that Congress declined to approve for the amount he requested.

In February, Congress approved $1.375 billion for construction of “primary pedestrian fencing” along the border in southeast Texas, well short of Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion to build border walls in Arizona and New Mexico as well as Texas.

To obtain the additional money, Trump declared a national emergency and diverted $601 million from a Treasury forfeiture fund, $3.6 billion from military construction and $2.5 billion earmarked for Department of Defense counterdrug programs.

“Congress’s refusal to fund President Trump’s wall isn’t an emergency, it’s democracy,” said a statement from Dror Ladin, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents plaintiffs in the case.

The Trump administration argues the plaintiffs have not shown any injury caused by the funding decisions and that existing law gives it the leeway to redirect the money for such purposes as “an unforeseen military requirement” or a “law enforcement activity.”

Trump made a border wall the center of his 2016 campaign for president, when he said Mexico would pay for construction. That pledge went nowhere, and Trump also hit resistance in Congress even as apprehensions of migrants by border agents hit a decade high as of April.

The plaintiffs in Friday’s hearing include 20 states, the Sierra Club environmental group and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which advocates for immigrants. They argued in court papers that the administration has violated the separation of power principle of the U.S. Constitution, among other claims.

The plaintiffs also said wall construction would harm the environment and the wildlife habitats for such creatures as Gila monsters and the Mexican wolf.

The diversion of Treasury forfeiture funds would undermine state law enforcement, they argued. New York state, for example, has used forfeiture funds to buy bullet-proof vests and naloxone, a drug that counters opioid overdoses.

Although it is not a plaintiff, the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives plans to argue in support of the plaintiffs at the hearing. The House called the diversion of funds a “flagrant disregard for the bedrock principle” that Congress controls federal spending.

The hearing comes the same week that Trump has outlined proposals to beef up security along the southwest border and shift immigration policy to favor well-educated English speakers over a system that emphasizes uniting families.

(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware, Editing by Rosalba O’Brien)

What do you think?

18 pledges
Upvote Downvote

Comments

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Tom Bodine
Member

Good lets send a plane load to this MF’s house.

Friend
Member

Illegals by definition violate the law. Some of them may be genuinely fleeing lawlessness and discrimination and may seek adjudication for asylum here. But they don’t form the core of the illegals; only 10 or 15% do by some accounts. The rest don’t qualify to be here legally and must be returned to their country. We are a nation of laws and we must remain so. Otherwise we are not a country.

Otis
Member

Gila monsters and wolves? The same über-libs who worry about that also promote ‘windmills’ which kill endangered birds everyday. Let the hypocrites open their homes to the illegals and Gila monsters, or do they have walls around their abodes?

Willie Horton
Member

If it’s an Obama, legislate from the bench, so called judge you already know what the ruling is. But it will be appealed to the SCOTUS.

Friend
Member

People south of the border are vaccinated moron, (like the way they show someone wearing a mask for a cold, which is customary) and the raciest and anti-immigrant make it look like their full of diseases. More likely American criminals, American gangbangers and the border patrol kill migrants, go on there website (border patrol died in the line of duty memoriam, 98% die from auto accidents and health related) would kill an illegal alien, then a illegal killing an American, DUI or auto accidents is not murder, as hundreds and thousands of Americans kill other Americans yearly, raciest bastard.The U.S.… Read more »

Omega 2
Guest
Omega 2

Yhe judge has no juristicton here on the EMERGENCY TO THE SAFETY OF OUR COUNTY!

Susan r
Guest
Susan r

This is about our constitution and the president seeking to go around it !!!!

John Furlong
Member

This is not the action of a U.S. judge, it is a wet back supporting pig

Loading…

0

Comments

0 comments

Missouri Poised to Pass Restrictive Abortion Law, Days After Alabama

Acosta Gets Called Out for Accusing Trump of Using a ‘Broad Brush’ on Asylum Seekers: ‘Plain False’