Media Outlets Flip Out Over ‘Mass Purge’ at DOJ — but All They Expose Is Their Own Short-Term Memory Loss

Note: This article contains coarse language that may offend some readers.

On March 10, word began to circulate that new Attorney General Jeff Sessions had issued a call for resignation — from every one of the 46 U.S. Attorneys who still remained from the Obama Administration.

Almost immediately, the hand-wringing pundits and sensationalized headlines began to emerge from the ether…

Some headlines simply led the readers to believe that the move was unexpected:

  • The New York Times: Trump Abruptly Orders 46 Obama-Era Prosecutors to Resign
  • New York Magazine: The DOJ Just Called for the Firing of 46 Obama-Appointed U.S. State’s Attorneys, Including Preet Bharara
  • CNN: Anger Mounts over Handling of US Attorney Firings

Others were a little more … sensational:

  • Vanity Fair: Trump’s Firing of U.S. Attorneys Raises Eyebrows, Prompts Conflict
  • Politics USA: Trump Fires All 46 Remaining US Attorneys Out Of Fear That Obama’s Out To Get Him

The Daily Beast’s Harry Siegel referenced Nixon’s less-than-Kosher dealings with his own DOJ when he tweeted:

University of California Irvine political science professor Rick Hasen suggested that the blame might lie with Sean Hannity:

In fact, Kasen wasn’t alone. Several sources referenced Hannity’s on-air call for a purge of the “deep state bureaucrats” at the Justice Department in their coverage of Sessions’ action — which occurred very shortly thereafter:

But then a few people pointed out that nothing President Trump or Attorney Jeff Sessions has done is outrageous — or even unprecedented. And this particular action — calling for the resignation of the remaining 46 U.S. attorneys — is more reminiscent of Bill Clinton than Richard Nixon.

In 1993, shortly after taking office, President Bill Clinton authorized Attorney General Janet Reno’s clean sweep of the DOJ, calling for 93 resignations simultaneously:

And Attorney General Jeff Sessions would know — as he was one of them:

A few sources got it right:

  • National Review: Sessions’s Firing of 46 Obama-Appointed U.S. Attorneys Isn’t Scandalous
  • Slate: Yes, Trump and Sessions Just Cleaned House at the DOJ. No, It’s Not Shocking.

But overall, this action — even if it were unprecedented — should not come as a surprise. President Trump ran on a few very specific promises, one of which was that he would “drain the swamp.” It seems more than likely that the DOJ (in particular, any leftover appointees from the previous administration) is part of that “swamp.”

What do you think?

Judge Who Put the Kibosh on First ‘Travel Ban’ Says He Won’t Pull the Trigger on the Second Version

Monks Rescues Schnauzer off the Streets. One Look At His Beard And You Know What They Named Him