Migrant Mothers and Children Sue U.S. Over Asylum Ban

Henry Romero/Reuters

More than 125 migrant mothers and children have sued the U.S. government, claiming the Trump administration has violated the rights of asylum-seekers through the arbitrary and capricious implementation of a virtual asylum ban at the southern border.

The lawsuit, filed late on Monday, was the first to challenge President Donald Trump over asylum since the U.S. Supreme Court decided last week that an anti-asylum rule will be allowed to take effect while a separate lawsuit on its underlying legality is heard.

Unlike other suits that have targeted the asylum rule itself, the latest filing challenges the Trump administration on procedural grounds, saying the government has enacted changes without warning, resulting in elevated rejection rates for asylum-seekers.

With the administration rolling out a series of anti-immigration regulations in rapid succession, asylum-seekers are not being told which of the shifting standards will apply to their cases, said Hassan Ahmad, the lead attorney on the lawsuit.

“What we’re challenging is the haphazard lack of legal procedure. There’s no rhyme or reason to it,” Ahmad said.

The plaintiffs are 126 women and children from 59 families, mostly from the impoverished and violent Central American countries of El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, who were rejected in the early stages of the asylum process while staying at the South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas.

The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

Trump’s virtual asylum ban at the southern border denies migrants if they did not first seek safe haven in another country that they traveled through on the way to the United States, such as Mexico or Guatemala.

Other lawsuits previously filed challenge the rule itself, and lower courts had agreed to block implementation immediately. But in a big victory for Trump, the Supreme Court last Wednesday allowed the rule to take effect immediately while the trial is heard.

As a result, immigration judges can reject asylum claims, regardless of their merits, if the applicant did not first seek asylum in another country.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Trump administration has called the surge of Central American immigration a crisis and says most migrants falsify asylum claims as a ruse to gain entry to the United States.

(Reporting by Daniel Trotta; Editing by Dan Grebler)

What do you think?

-6 pledges
Upvote Downvote
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jose Martinez

Law abiding citizens with guns are now criminals and illegal gang members are now victims? Only in a Democrat run America.

Gene Ralno

Sorry, it’s our country and we get to make the rules.

Tom Bodine

Well of course they are suing with the help of the DNC who desperately needs the new voters.

Walter Swartz
Walter Swartz

The article is also incomplete… It has nothing in there of whom it is putting up the money, whom it is supporting the suit and which judges allowed this to go to trial in the first place. Let’s hear about it.

Walter Swartz
Walter Swartz

All of this is nonsense. We have a crisis, the dems disagree claiming Trump created the false crisis, 6 months later, all they do is report about the “crisis” at the border. Other dems broadcast how cruel Trump is (for doing things the left has done to a FAR WORSE degree – according to their definition of cruel), now will go ape wild over the plaintiffs suit against said president…

This can and COULD have been avoided had the wall been built, but what would dems have to cry about? They NEED something to cry about. It’s that simple.


Non-citizens who are trying to get into this country are suing because they don’t like the law of this country!!
Enough is enough, if this wasn’t so pathetic, it would be funny.

Jeffrey Moore

“‘What we’re challenging is the haphazard lack of legal procedure. There’s no rhyme or reason to it,’ Ahmad said.”

That’s rich! The lack of legal procedure is them crossing the border illegally!

And isn’t it interesting that a Muslim lawyer is representing them?

Bonnie Keever

First that law is in the immigration law it has not been used by the other president there has been violence in these countries even in the 80 70 but Mexico did offer you that option you refuse you have no rights here or any legal rights to file any kind of a lawsuit

Exclusive: Pence Rebuffs Solomon Islands PM After Nation Cuts Ties With Taiwan

U.S. Senators Urge FTC to Scrutinize Multi-Billion Dollar Pharma Mergers