Pelosi: ‘I’m Not for Impeachment’ of Trump

Nancy Pelosi
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Last updated 3/11/2019 at 5:34 p.m. ET.

U.S. President Donald Trump should not be impeached unless the reasons are overwhelming and bipartisan, given how divisive it would be for the country, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a Washington Post interview published on Monday.

“I’m not for impeachment,” Pelosi, the top U.S. Democrat, said in the interview, which was conducted last week.

“Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country,” she said. “He’s just not worth it.”

It was Pelosi’s most direct comment yet on Trump’s possible impeachment, a topic she has dealt with cautiously as it carries the potential to sharply split Democrats and the public ahead of next year’s White House and congressional elections.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, possible collusion between Trump’s campaign and the Russian government and whether Trump has attempted to obstruct the probe. Trump has denied wrongdoing and called the investigation a witch hunt.

Mueller is expected to send a report soon to Attorney General William Barr outlining his findings, and any evidence of wrongdoing could prompt Congress to take action against the president. Several panels in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives are also investigating the president.

Although Pelosi said she believed it would be too divisive to impeach Trump, she characterized the president as unfit to hold office.

“No, I don’t think he’s fit to be president of the United States,” Pelosi told the Post, adding he was “ethically unfit, intellectually unfit, curiosity-wise unfit.”

Democrats face growing pressure from the left for impeachment, including a multimillion-dollar ad campaign from liberal billionaire Tom Steyer to build support for action against Trump.

The House Judiciary Committee, which would lead an impeachment inquiry, recently launched a broad probe of corruption, abuse of power and obstruction of justice allegations against Trump that could amount to impeachable offenses.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler has said he believes Trump has committed obstruction of justice, but that it is too soon to decide on impeachment.

“We do not now have the evidence all sorted out,” Nadler told ABC’s “This Week” program on March 3. “Before you impeach somebody, you have to persuade the American public that it ought to happen,” Nadler added.

(Reporting by David Alexander; Editing by Peter Cooney and Tom Brown)

What do you think?

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
James
Member

“Impeachment is so divisive . . . .” What about the divisiveness created by the Socialist Party (formerly called Democrats)? Are we to understand that using Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” as the Party’s playbook is NOT dividing the Nation? Or, foreigners like Obama and his destructive anti-American agenda, his racism, his support for his fellow Muslim terrorists, his hatred of White people, his ignoring Black people was NOT dividing the Nation?

Timoteo Suazo
Member

“… unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming…”

That is pretty much the criteria to begin with.

Rocky Drummond
Member

Of course she doesn’t want to go through an impeachment. That would interfere with the system of corruption and Nancy is one of the most corrupted.

The DNC wants to keep the money flowing, unless enough proof of Trump’s crimes are revealed so that the House has no choice and it *must* react to it.

Otherwise, I wouldn’t start making bets just yet.

Screwtape
Member

Cynically speaking of the Dim agenda, they’ ve been working a big target for years, one that the wannabes will be targeting.

It would be inefficient for them to switch targets (i.e. Pence) and waste all that futile effort and taxpayer dollars spent. Either they have impeachable charges or not. It’s abundantly clear that it’s NOT.

NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio Forces Schools to Adopt ‘Meatless Monday’ School Lunches to Combat Climate Change

New York Attorney General Is Investigating Trump Projects: NY Times