Pro-Business Trade Group Counters Warren’s Idea to Break Up Tech Companies: ‘Bad for All Americans’

Following Sen. Elizabeth Warren‘s (D-Mass.) unveiling of her proposal to break up big tech companies, a pro-business trade group is firing back to say the move would not only hurt the middle class but “all Americans.”

As IJR Blue reported, the 2020 Democratic presidential candidate announced her plan in a series of tweets on Friday. She also outlined the idea in a post for Medium.

Warren’s plan involves requiring tech companies that offer an online marketplace or exchange, such as Amazon or Google, to refrain from competing on their own platform. In doing so, this would, for instance, bar Amazon from selling on its Amazon Marketplace platform.

According to her, this would allow small businesses to prosper:

Small businesses would have a fair shot to sell their products on Amazon without the fear of Amazon pushing them out of business. Google couldn’t smother competitors by demoting their products on Google Search. Facebook would face real pressure from Instagram and WhatsApp to improve the user experience and protect our privacy. Tech entrepreneurs would have a fighting chance to compete against the tech giants.

E-commerce group NetChoice, whose members include Google and Facebook, disputed Warren’s claims that her plan would help the middle class.

“Never before have consumers and workers had more access to goods, services, and opportunities online,” Carl Szabo, vice president and general counsel for NetChoice, pushed back. “Breaking up tech companies would hurt — not help — America’s middle class.

“Sen. Warren’s proposal would increase prices for consumers, make search and maps less useful, and raise costs to small businesses that advertise online. This proposal is bad for all Americans,” he added.

Tom Donohue, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, appeared to agree, saying that breaking up these companies would “take us back to the Stone Age” and calling the plan “not a vision for the future, but an archaic idea that should be dumped in your computer trash can.”

Warren launched her 2020 bid to take on President Donald Trump earlier this year. Things got off to a rough start when one of her own volunteers notably walked out in the middle of her announcement speech, as IJR Red noted.

Published in IJR Red


  1. Warren is full of bad-ideas and questionable choices, but I agree with her in this case. Why are roughly a half-dozen companies allowed to control so much power over the internet and media? It stinks of monopolism or something like the Russian oligarchy.

    1. I actually wonder how Chief Spreading Bull was able to accumulate a net worth of $5 million as a Senator. Tech company investments?

      1. Here’s the hypocrisy of Liawatha and Larry David’s evil twin: THEY ARE THE 1% they rail against. She ranks 76th out of 541 Congressional members. I’ll let you work the quintiles. This also speaks to the credulous, unquestioning idiots who buy her lies.

        According to, CNN Money, etc. her averaged net worth is north of $8.75M, largely due to investments in bonds, stocks, TIAA-CREF, and has at least $800k invested in banks. More hypocrisy in pushing the CFPB?

Comments are closed.