Groups Say US Census Citizenship Question Was Designed to Influence Elections

Brian Snyder/Reuters

Last updated 5/31/2019 at 11:21 a.m. ET.

The Trump administration concealed evidence that its proposal to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 U.S. census was intended to help Republicans draw favorable electoral maps, according to immigrant advocacy groups that sued the administration over the question last year.

In a filing in Manhattan federal court on Thursday, the groups said that the administration hid the fact during the course of the lawsuit that went to trial last year that Thomas Hofeller, a longtime Republican specialist on drawing electoral districts, played a “significant role” in planning the citizenship question.

The conservative-majority Supreme Court is due to issue a final ruling by the end of June on whether the question can be added in time for next year’s census.

The challengers notified the high court about the new documents in a letter filed at the court on Thursday afternoon. They did not ask the Supreme Court to take any specific action.

The plaintiffs, which include the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee and Make The Road New York, learned of Hofeller’s role after his files came to light in separate litigation in North Carolina in which Republican-drawn electoral districts are being challenged.

A Justice Department representative said the allegations were a “last-ditch effort to derail the Supreme Court’s consideration of this case.”

“The Department looks forward to responding in greater detail to these baseless accusations in its filing on Monday,” the person said.

Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman blocked the question’s inclusion following the trial, but the Supreme Court appeared poised to overturn that ruling at April’s oral argument.

According to Thursday’s filing, Hofeller concluded in a 2015 study that asking census respondents whether they are U.S. citizens “would clearly be a disadvantage to the Democrats” and “advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites” in redistricting.

Hofeller went on to ghostwrite a draft letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to the Department of Commerce, asking for a citizenship question on the grounds it would help enforce voting rights, according to the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, said that administration officials gave false testimony about the origin of the question during the lawsuit, and have asked Furman to consider imposing unspecified sanctions against them.

Furman has scheduled a hearing on the request for June 5.

Reuters reported in April that the Trump administration believed its citizenship question could help Republicans in elections by enabling states to draw electoral maps based only on citizen population, rather than total population.

Opponents have said a citizenship question would cause a sizeable undercount by deterring immigrant households and Latinos from filling out the census forms, out of fear the information would be shared with law enforcement. That would, they argue, cost Democratic-leaning areas electoral representation in Congress and federal aid, benefiting President Donald Trump’s fellow Republicans and Republican-leaning parts of the country.

(Reporting by Brendan Pierson and Andrew Chung in New York; Additional reporting by Lawrence Hurley in Washington; Editing by Steve Orlofsky, Tom Brown and Lisa Shumaker)

What do you think?

15 pledges
Upvote Downvote
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
General Confusion
Member

I am confused by the majority of comments below. Do you actually believe in the Constitution or not? The Constitution is very specific about who is to be counted: Section 2 of the 14th Amendment states: “Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, COUNTING THE WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS IN EACH STATE, excluding Indians not taxed.” Now, aside of the point about “Indians”, the founding fathers clearly wanted us to know how many PEOPLE existed in the country, NOT how many citizens. The problem, as you all seem to be keenly aware, is that… Read more »

War Eagle
Guest
War Eagle

Only citizens have the right to vote in federal elections, therefore, a block for citizen and a block for noncitizen is indeed appropriate for drawing electoral districts. Senators and House Representatives are elected by citizens to represent citizens, not visiting immigrants nor illegal invaders!

Henry Sisson
Member

I think only legal citizens should be counted. All the illegal aiens should not be counted PERIOD.

Lora
Guest
Lora

There has been citizenship questions on the American Community Survey for over a decade. We have a right to know how many non-citizens are living in the country, using schools, hospitals, highways and other public resources. We also have a right to know how many refuse to learn English, increasing the cost to taxpayers of certain public programs

IRENE
Member

MELANIA AND HER FAMILY DID EVERYTHING THE RIGHT WAY, WHY DO THE DEMS CONSTANTLY TRY TO FIND ISSUES OR MAKE THEM UP? WHY CAN’T THEY DO THEIR JOB THEY WERE VOTED IN TO DO…..LEAVE TRUMPS FAMILY ALONE…THAT MEANS HIS KIDS ALSO….LOOK AT YOUR OWN KIDS FIRST…ARE THEY ANY BETTER?

Sherri
Member

I don’t give a rat’s patootie who’s behind the question. I’m sick of anyone being counted other then AMERICAN CITIZENS for representation in the number of house seats! Dems have used this little trick for decades to gain seats. COUNT AMERICANS ONLY!!!

Glenn Botts
Member

The only people that should be counted are Americans for the purpose of elections, funding, etc. Illegals should be counted only to keep track of the invaders to determine where best to round them up for deportation.

Otis
Member

What is the purpose of a census if not to gather facts?

Conservatives Point Out Irony in ‘Family Friendly’ Disney’s Threat to Stop GA Production Over Pro-Life Bill

Pelosi Uses Melania Trump and Her Parents as Bait to Knock POTUS’ Merit-Based Immigration Proposal