Scalise Rips Dems for Refusing Vote on Born-Alive Bill After Report Details High Number of Failed Abortions

As a new finding reveals at least 40 babies have been born after an attempted abortion in three states in recent years, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) is reiterating his call for action to protect the infants.

Scalise is a vocal backer of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act and has placed pressure on his Democratic colleagues to bring the bill up for a vote in the House of Representatives.

State records reported by Fox News show there have been 11 babies born in Minnesota since 2016 after botched abortions — three since 2018 — as well as 10 in Arizona since 2017 and 19 in Florida since 2017.

Scalise pointed to the reality of why he believes the Born-Alive Act is so crucial to pass — to ensure “ALL newborns access to life-saving care.”

“The Left likes to say it doesn’t happen,” he tweeted. “But state records confirm babies are in fact being born alive during abortions.”

He blasted his House Democratic colleagues blocking the vote 80 times as “shameful.”

On the flip side, Physicians for Reproductive Health fellow Dr. Diane Horvath told Fox News, “These data are likely reflecting cases in which a woman has a wanted pregnancy but is unable to continue it, where she makes the decision with her doctor to end the pregnancy through induction of labor.”

Scalise, joined by Rep. Ann Wagner (R-Mo.), filed a discharge petition for the bill in early April, but, six months later, it only gained three Democrats signature while all 197 Republicans signed it, as IJR Red previously reported.

“Is it really possible that only three Democrats in the House believe babies born alive during an abortion deserve medical care?” Scalise wrote in a Fox News op-ed published on Aug. 5, along with Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “As grim as it sounds, that’s the reality we face.”

The news of only three Democrats signing the discharge petition struck a nerve with other Republican lawmakers as well.

Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.) called it “unacceptable.”

“I repeat, Democrats are blocking a bill to require doctors to treat infants who’ve survived abortions,” Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) tweeted in response.

Responses

  1. “Are conservatives really thinking people abort healthy pregnancies in the third trimester for some flippant reason?” Phoenix

    Yes. Confusing? Not really.

    Conservatives have irrationally painted themselves into a corner where they are quite happy to stay.

    1. Now repeat that last sentence in English.

      Never mind. I see by the number of Down votes nobody else understood your confused gibberish either.

  2. Why did the explanation from an actual physician get only a single sentence in this article?

    Here’s the full explanation as posted in Fox News article:

    Dr. Diane Horvath, a fellow at Physicians for Reproductive Health, argued that anti-abortion figures are “manipulating” the complexities of abortion.

    “These data are likely reflecting cases in which a woman has a wanted pregnancy but is unable to continue it, where she makes the decision with her doctor to end the pregnancy through induction of labor,” Horvath told Fox News in a written statement. “Examples may include a woman who has life-threatening bleeding before her baby is viable, who was in a car accident and has severe injuries that would require labor to be induced, or who received a fetal diagnosis that was incompatible with life.”

    Exactly what in those scenarios require government intervention that isn’t already required? Afterward the baby is kept comfortable and likely held by grieving parents until he/she passes away. These aren’t happy scenarios nor indication of a selfish mother not wanting a few stretch marks.

    Are conservatives really thinking people abort healthy pregnancies in the third trimester for some flippant reason?

    1. 2 IJR readers did not like you doing Madison’s job for her. But, thank you for the full context.

Comments are closed.