Senior U.S. Senate Democrat Fears Barr Probe of Russian Meddling Could Hurt Spy Alliance

FILE PHOTO: Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) questions David Marcus, head of Facebook's Calibra (digital wallet service), during testimony before a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on "Examining Facebook's Proposed Digital Currency and Data Privacy Considerations" on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 16, 2019. REUTERS/Erin Scott
FILE PHOTO: Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) questions David Marcus, head of Facebook's Calibra (digital wallet service), during testimony before a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on "Examining Facebook's Proposed Digital Currency and Data Privacy Considerations" on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 16, 2019. REUTERS/Erin Scott

U.S. spy agencies’ critical partnerships with English-speaking counterparts could be undermined by Attorney General William Barr’s investigation into the roots of a probe of Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election, a top Senate Democrat said.

Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-chairman Mark Warner told Reuters that Barr’s recent efforts to question British and Australian officials about how and why their intelligence agencies started collecting information linking President Donald Trump’s campaign to Russia amounted to “asking our most trusted partners to weigh in on political matters.”

“This puts in jeopardy the whole Five Eyes relationship,” Warner said, referring to a post-World War II arrangement under which spy agencies of the U.S. and four English-speaking allies – Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand – share secrets and divide up the world into geographical zones of expertise.

“For the most part, Trump IC (intelligence community) appointees have done a pretty good job maintaining their integrity,” Warner added. But he said he worries that “sometimes it feels like the administration doesn’t ever get it.”

He said agencies must “speak truth to power and not allow their services to be co-opted. We as a committee have to have their backs.”

Warner was responding to reports that Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham of Connecticut had approached British, Australian and Italian authorities with questions about the bona fides of sources such as Josef Mifsud, a Maltese academic whose gossip about alleged Russian possession of Hillary Clinton emails helped to trigger the initial FBI investigation.

Justice Department officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. Barr has told CBS News that official explanations for the FBI’s investigation “don’t hang together.”

Some former law-enforcement officials have raised concerns Barr is using the Justice Department to chase unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that could benefit Trump politically. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation concluded Moscow interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump.

Following a visit to Britain in July for a summit of Five Eyes officials, Barr held a private meeting with British Attorney General Geoffrey Cox. The subject matter of the meeting has not been made public.

Stephan Roh, a Zurich lawyer who represented Mifsud, said he has not heard from the academic for some time. He said Mifsud was represented by a London law firm in connection with U.S. investigations. A representative of the London law firm, Howard Kennedy, declined to comment.

(Reporting By Mark Hosenball; Editing by Scott Malone and Nick Macfie)

What do you think?

Comments

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
General Confusion
Member

“Does anyone believe that foreign intelligence services, no matter how ‘friendly’, do not, as a matter of course, spy on the United States?” Otis Even though there WERE laws, even rights, to prevent OUR OWN government from spying on us, they did so anyway since about 1900, until we lost our protection and rights after the 9/11 attacks. A LOT of us sat back and were willing to let the government take them away from us – without a fight – regardless of our millions of guns. So don’t confuse who is spying on who. Foreigners do it because. We… Read more »

john
Member

More of everything trumpisphuckedup, the grotesquely self absorbed traitor, and his administration touches turns to shit.

WellHungChad
Member

So according to Warner, foreign governments should be given free reign when it comes to influencing our elections when asked by an incumbent US political candidate to investigate their opponents…..

Sounds a lot like Warner is trying to justifyi Barack Obama’s approval of intelligence surveillance of a political adversary. ONLY a president can do that!

Otis
Member

I dropped out of the IJR ‘community’ because of the blatant censorship and ‘spam-calling’ but have monitored now and again and thought, what the Hell?
At least one more time…Does anyone believe that foreign intelligence services, no matter how ‘friendly’, do not, as a matter of course, spy on the United States?
They would be fools not to do so.
Our nation is in a dualistic quagmire and there are enemies among us. The OSS would be livid!

Loading…

0

Comments

0 comments

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John J. Sullivan arrives at the Lopez Palace in Asuncion, Paraguay September 6, 2019. REUTERS/Jorge Adorno

Trump Names John Sullivan as His Pick for U.S. Ambassador to Russia

Former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch arrives to testify in the U.S. House of Representatives impeachment inquiry into U.S. President Trump on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., October 11, 2019. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Ex-Envoy Tells Impeachment Inquiry Trump Ousted Her Based on ‘False Claims’