Top Democrats Tell Trump Gun Bill Must Include Universal Background Checks

Jonathan Ernst/File Photo/Reuters

Top Democrats in Congress told Republican President Donald Trump on Sunday that any gun control legislation that falls short of universal background checks for gun sales “will not get the job done.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said they spoke to Trump by phone on Sunday morning, which marked 200 days since the Democratic House passed legislation to expand background checks to all gun purchases.

In the aftermath of a series of mass shootings in August that killed more than 30 people, Trump has been discussing potential legislation with lawmakers in both parties. He said on Wednesday that progress was being made on gun legislation, adding that many areas were under discussion, including background checks.

The Republican-controlled Senate has yet to take up the House bill. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters last week: Until the White House gives us some indication of what the president is willing to sign we are waiting to see what it looks like.”

He added: “These horrendous shootings – in my opinion -deserve a response, I hope we can get something that can actually become the law of the United States of America.”

Pelosi and Schumer said in a joint statement after the phone call with Trump: “This morning, we made it clear to the President that any proposal he endorses that does not include the House-passed universal background checks legislation will not get the job done, as dangerous loopholes will still exist and people who shouldn’t have guns will still have access.”

The two leaders said they promised to join Trump “for a historic signing ceremony at the Rose Garden” if the president would endorse the legislation and lean on McConnell to pass it “to save as many lives as possible.”

The White House described Trump’s call with Pelosi and Schumer as “cordial,” but said the president had not made any commitments on the House bill, known as H.R. 8.

Trump has “instead indicated his interest in working to find a bipartisan legislative solution on appropriate responses to the issue of mass gun violence,” White House spokesman Judd Deere said in an emailed comment. “The president reiterated his commitment for his administration to continue work on these issues.”

Previous attempts to pass gun control after mass shootings, including the December 2012 killings of 20 children and six staff members at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, have mostly failed in the face of fierce lobbying by the National Rifle Association and other gun groups.

The shooting sprees in August in Texas and Ohio put renewed focus on the issue. Trump said he favored action, possibly on tackling mental health issues related to the violence or expanded background checks.

The White House has yet to outline any specific proposals, but officials said the measures might include expediting the death penalty for mass shooters.

(Reporting by Aram Roston and Roberta Rampton; Editing by Soyoung Kim and Peter Cooney)

What do you think?

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Also to Joyce, If the estimated (low) 400+ million firearms were ALL used to kill there’d be a LOT fewer people. If every firearm were used, just once, to kill someone it would exceed the US population, including illegals. Consider that. Since you brought up automobiles/trucks, etc. Consider this: YOU DON’T NEED A BACKGROUND CHECK TO BUY A CAR. Also consider this: Cars kill people in #s several orders of magnitude greater than guns. Why don’t we start banning cars? Now let’s consider swimming pools, fists/feet, and knives….. Registries AND confiscations have FAILED internationally and locally. q.v. NY, NJ, CT’s… Read more »


Joyce, 2016 clearly demonstrated that polls are bullshit. Consider Beta’s mythical meeting with gun owners at a gun show. That was as believable as Corey Booker’s T-Bone. Clearly you subscribe to the Duke Nukem school of thought. “We’ll just bomb them or nuke them.” Who cares about any innocent lives lost? FYI, wars are still fought by people. Guns work really well against those. Consider the consequences to the bureaucrats, government officials, and their families. Invest in the personal security industry if this happens and stock up on essentials. We’ve been at war in the ‘stan for 18 years. The… Read more »

Tom Bodine

This coming from the do-nothing party, well except lie and steal. 🐀’s


Nice sound bites. But it’s already being done isn’t it? Leave it up to these two to support the obvious. They’ll need to set up a booth in all the back alleys to catch those illegal guns being sold.


Any “system” should work, first and foremost. While the current NICS system is not perfect it needs much more work AND better integration with local law-enforcement, mental-health systems, etc.

They should also start prosecuting those who either falsify or lie on their 4473s. As of now the # of actual follow-ups on these violations is close to zero.


two questions:

1. How will they enforce this without a national gun registry? They will not know who owns what or whether the guns were traded/sold before the UBC.

2. The most recent mass shooters PASSED background checks to buy their guns, except the El Paso shooter who bought an illegally manufactured firearm with NO background check conducted.

They know this, but they will proceed with the UBC because it seems like they are doing something effective.


I wonder how many MS13 thugs will submit to ‘background checks’? More ignorant blather from Gomez and Morticia.


How about universal background checks on all politicians with the presumption that anyone who wants to hold public office must be mentally unstable.

Trump Rebuffs Kavanaugh Impeachment Calls After New Sexual Misconduct Report

North Korea Leader Kim Invited Trump to Pyongyang in Letter: Report