Trump Heaps Another 5% Tariff on Chinese Goods in Latest Tit-For-Tat Escalation

Kevin Lamarque/File Photo/Reuters

U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday lashed back at a new round of Chinese tariffs by heaping an additional 5% duty on some $550 billion in targeted Chinese goods in the latest tit-for-tat trade war escalation by the world’s two largest economies.

Trump’s move, announced on Twitter, came hours after China unveiled retaliatory tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. goods, prompting the president earlier in the day to demand U.S. companies move their operations out of China.

The intensifying U.S.-China trade war stoked market fears that the global economy will tip into recession, sending U.S. stocks into a tailspin, with the Nasdaq Composite <.IXIC> down 3%, and the S&P 500 <.SPX> down 2.6%.

U.S. Treasury yields also declined as investors sought safe-haven assets, and crude oil, targeted for the first time by Chinese tariffs, fell sharply.

Trump’s tariff response was announced after markets closed on Friday, leaving potentially more damage for next week.

“Sadly, past Administrations have allowed China to get so far ahead of Fair and Balanced Trade that it has become a great burden to the American Taxpayer,” Trump said on Twitter. “As President, I can no longer allow this to happen!”

He said the United States would raise its existing tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports to 30% from the current 25% beginning on Oct. 1, the 70th anniversary of the founding of the communist People’s Republic of China.

At the same time, Trump announced an increase in planned tariffs on the remaining $300 billion worth of Chinese goods to 15% from 10%. The United States will begin imposing those tariffs on some products starting Sept. 1, but tariffs on about half of those goods have been delayed until Dec. 15.

The U.S. Trade Representative’s office confirmed the effective dates, but said it would conduct a public comment period before imposing the 30% tariff rate on Oct. 1.

U.S. business groups reacted angrily to the new tariff hike.

“It’s impossible for businesses to plan for the future in this type of environment. The administration’s approach clearly isn’t working, and the answer isn’t more taxes on American businesses and consumers. Where does this end?” said David French, a senior vice president for the National Retail Federation.

Trump is due to meet leaders of the G7 major economies at a summit this weekend in France, where trade tensions will be among the hottest discussion topics.


The president’s announcement, which followed an Oval Office meeting with his advisers, fits a pattern of swift retaliation since the trade dispute with China started more than a year ago.

“He decided he wanted to respond. He was given a few different options on things he could do and ultimately that was what he decided,” a senior White House official said.

“He’s not taking this stuff lightly, but he’s in a fine mood and looking forward to the G7.”

Another person familiar with the matter said officials had to scramble to come up with options after Trump caught them offguard with tweets promising a response in the afternoon.

Since taking office in 2017, Trump has demanded that China make sweeping changes to its economic policies to end theft and forced transfers of American intellectual property, curb industrial subsidies, open its markets to American companies and increase purchases of U.S. goods.

China denies Trump’s accusations of unfair trade practices and has resisted concessions to Washington.

“We don’t need China and, frankly, would be far better off without them. The vast amounts of money made and stolen by China from the United States, year after year, for decades, will and must STOP,” Trump tweeted on Friday morning.

“Our great American companies are hereby ordered to immediately start looking for an alternative to China, including bringing your companies HOME and making your products in the USA.”

It’s unclear what legal authority Trump would be able to use to compel U.S. companies to close operations in China or stop sourcing products from the country. Experts said he could invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act used in the past for sanctions on Iran and North Korea, or cut offending companies out of federal procurement contracts..

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce rebuffed Trump’s call, urging “continued, constructive engagement.”

“Time is of the essence. We do not want to see a further deterioration of U.S.-China relations,” Myron Brilliant, executive vice president and head of the business group’s international affairs, said in a statement.

Trump also said he was ordering shippers including FedEx <FDX.N>. Inc <AMZN.O>, UPS <UPS.N> and the U.S. Postal Service to search out and refuse all deliveries of the opioid fentanyl to the United States.

China’s Commerce Ministry said that on Sept. 1 and Dec. 15 it will impose additional tariffs of 5% or 10% on a total of 5,078 products originating from the United States and reinstitute tariffs of 25% on cars and 5% on auto parts suspended last December as U.S.-China trade talks accelerated.

It was unclear whether a new round of talks expected in September would go ahead.

China Daily, an official English-language daily often used by Beijing to communicate its message to the rest of the world, said China’s tariff list is the result of “prudent calculation”.

“With the U.S. proceeding at full throttle with its beggar-thy-neighbor policy, China has no choice but to fight back to protect its core national and economic interests,” it said in an editorial on Saturday.

“China has taken the countermeasures so that U.S. decision-makers wake up and smell the coffee. And appreciate that until Washington follows the Osaka consensus, there can be no deal.”


The growing economic impact of the trade dispute was a key reason behind the U.S. Federal Reserve’s move to cut interest rates last month for the first time in more than a decade.

“The president’s trade war threatens to push the economy into a ditch,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. “The president is hoping that the Federal Reserve will … bail him out, but if he continues to pursue the war, the Fed won’t be up to the task.”

Among U.S. goods targeted by Beijing’s latest duties were soybeans, which will be hit with an extra 5% tariff starting Sept. 1. China will also tag beef and pork from the United States with an extra 10% tariff, as well as ethanol with an additional 10% duty from December 15.

Although the Trump administration has rolled out aid to farmers stung by China’s tariffs, there is growing frustration in America’s agricultural belt, a key political constituency for Trump as he heads into his 2020 re-election campaign.

“The view from much of farm country is bleak and anger is boiling over. With bankruptcies and delinquencies rising and prices falling, the frustration with the lack of progress toward a deal is growing,” the bipartisan Farmers for Free Trade group said in a statement.

(Reporting by Judy Hua, Min Zhang, Se Young Lee, Stella Qiu, Hallie Gu and Dominique Patton in BEIJING, Yilei Sun and Winni Zhou in SHANGHAI, David Lawder, David Shepardson, Doina Chiacu, Jeff Mason, Steve Holland in WASHINGTON and Koh Gui Qing in New York; Additional reporting by Jason Lange, Andrea Shalal and Humeyra Pamuk in WASHINGTON and Tom Polansek and Julie Ingwersen in Chicago; Writing by Paul Simao; Editing by Alison Williams, Howard Goller and Sonya Hepinstall)

What do you think?

15 pledges
Upvote Downvote


newest oldest most voted
Notify of
General Confusion

King Donald The Loser needs to hurry up and make a deal with China or else Tomi Lahren might have some trouble with your tariffs on her new, made-in-china, millenial, Spandex clothing line.

Qaz Wiz

this boils down to “IS THERE A TRADE IMBALANCE OR NOT?” facts stated: $250 billion worth of Chinese imports to 30% …. on the remaining $300 billion worth of Chinese goods to 15% from 10% -so $550 billion being bought from China vs China unveiled retaliatory tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. goods that’s 3 Chinese buying to 22 Americans ratio but if it were adjusted per capita (there’s 3x as many Chinese as Americans even if you include the invaders from the south) so there should be a 3 to one ratio a disparity of 22x trade value….… Read more »

General Confusion

“Say WHAT? Boy is your clock ever running backwards! FYI: DOWN votes are NOT support by any stretch of the imagination – except maybe in YOUR head.” Confused James As I explained before, the majority of the members here are vicious bigots, racists rabid or otherwise, misinformed by your controllers, and weak-minded to the extreme following a blowhard, dotard cult leader, so any down votes from people like that can only be seen by rational people who can think for themselves as votes of approval. Nothing else makes much sense, so that’s my plan and I am sticking to it.… Read more »



For the Genitally Contused “down votes” are the participation trophies he never received as a child, because he was a quitter. You have to be in “it” to win “it”.

He gets off on trolling people here. Just like Phil does. He’s even started to post in the manner she does.

General Confusion

“How long before YOU get the message? Confused James

I got the message a long time ago, but it isn’t the message that you all intented. The more down votes that I get proves the more right I am. So every time someone adds a down vote, the more support you give to me.



>Always Confused< In case IJR won't fix their defective site.

There are ALWAYS down votes on everything you post because nobody believes a word of what you post except you. How long before YOU get the message?


Glad this is happening. Hopefully it will force corporations to bring home manufacturing, put Americans to work and stimulate our economy. Yes maybe we will have to pay more but I’d rather see Americans working than save a few pennies so a country that violates human rights, uses slave labor ,Steals intellectual content and is nothing short of our enemy can profit


Genitally Confused,

You have an extremely shallow understanding of how things work. You’re ignorant, hence your confusion.

You earlier posted about concrete that sequesters CO2. Really? Does it sequester MORE than used to make it? Please provide #s. I’ll spoil that. It DOES NOT. q.v. material science.

You clearly have zero idea what concrete is made of, nor how those ingredients are made. hint: massive amounts of energy to make and transport.

Now tell us how electric vehicles and solar panels are “green”. hint: you can’t.





Trump Says He Wouldn’t Stop Fed Chair Powell If He Offered to Resign

Do It ‘for the Children’: Pelosi Tells Democrats to ‘Be Ready to Throw a Punch’ in 2020