Trump Calls Himself an ‘Environmentalist’ With a ‘Natural Instinct for Science’ — Then Denies Man-Made Climate Change

Donald Trump
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

While President Donald Trump has strayed away from his previous position that climate change doesn’t exist, the president still won’t agree with the vast majority of scientists that current global warming is a human-created phenomenon.

In an interview with the Associated Press, Trump said that he cares about the environment but won’t prioritize it over the economy.

“I am a person that believes very, very strongly in the environment. I am truly an environmentalist,” Trump said. “[…] But I also want jobs for our country.”

Earlier this month, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a report detailing that the effects of climate change may not be reversible.

But the president brushed it off.

“No, no. Some [scientists] say that and some say differently,” Trump said. “I mean, you have scientists on both sides of it. My uncle was a great professor at MIT for many years. Dr. John Trump. And I didn’t talk to him about this particular subject, but I have a natural instinct for science, and I will say that you have scientists on both sides of the picture.”

Trump is correct in saying that scientists aren’t in total agreement on climate change. However, Trump’s stance aligns with about 3 percent of scientists. According to NASA:

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

Trump has called climate change and global warming a hoax dozens of times but not so much since he stepped into the political spotlight:

Famously, Trump once theorized on Twitter that the Chinese government invented global warming:

The president has taken questionable action on climate policies since he entered office, most notably dropping out of the Paris climate agreement. Trump indirectly referenced the decision.

“If we would have, as an example, entered certain agreements with other countries, I actually think that we’re doing it so they could have an economic advantage,” Trump told the AP. “Because we would have had a tremendous — we would have been at a tremendous economic disadvantage if we entered into certain agreements.”

What do you think?

11 points
Upvote Downvote

5
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
1ntrepidOtisamsonite Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
rod repke
Guest
rod repke

How can a reptile brain have an instinct for anything other than eating, defecating, and coitus?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

The doofus in Chief. What an embarrassment!

1ntrepid
Guest
1ntrepid

“are any real solutions in the offing?” R U serious? Pulling out of the Paris Accord was just plain foolish. We have to start being very aggressive at sequestering CO2 that is already in the environment and slowing the output of more. Making cement produces a huge amount of CO2,… Read more »

Otisamsonite
Guest
Otisamsonite

Scientist Dizzy Lizzie comes through with what new information here? I have no doubt human activity has added to climate change, global warming, whatever term du jour, but are any real solutions in the offing? Merely breathing the air in Mexico City is equivalent to smoking two packs of cigarettes… Read more »

1ntrepid
Guest
1ntrepid

“I will say that you have scientists on both sides of the picture”

I have seen a peer review of the so-called 3% studies that don’t agree with everyone else. They are nothing-burgers. So, if you still ignore the real science, then you are an idiot and that includes Pres. Donny.

‘You Don’t Have to Be Sherlock Holmes’: Graham Slams Khashoggi Investigation, Points to Saudi Royal Family

Saudi Arabia

Senate Dems Call on Trump to Disclose ‘Any Financial Ties’ to Saudi Arabia