Trump Campaign Touts Republican Rule Changes Aimed at Unified 2020 Convention

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign detailed on Monday efforts to change Republican Party rules across the country to reduce the potential for opposition to the president at the 2020 nominating convention.

Three Trump campaign senior officials told reporters on a call on Monday they have worked with state parties to make it harder for Republican primary opponents to influence the selection of the delegates to the convention

Trump, who enjoys strong popularity in public opinion polls within his own party, is facing three primary opponents, all of whom have struggled to gain traction.

The Republican Party will hold its official nominating convention in Charlotte in August 2020. Convention delegates – who officially select the nominee – are chosen by states and in modern times reflect the primary vote taken in each state.

While a small convention rebellion would be unlikely to dislodge Trump as the Republican nominee, the optics could be damaging for Trump, who likes to tout his broad support within his party.

“The rules of the party now reflect adequately that the will of the voters in the president’s party. This is not being done from a position of weakness,” one of the senior campaign officials said. The campaign officials could not be named as part of an agreement to listen to the call.

In some states, the primary vote has been canceled entirely and party officials will select pro-Trump delegates. In other states, new rules backed by Trump’s campaign will make it harder for primary opponents who garner a small percentage of the vote to influence delegate selection.

The campaign appears to be working to ensure there is not a repeat of the 2016 convention, where Trump was nominated in Cleveland. His campaign put minimal effort into influencing delegate selection and at times, opposition to his victory in the Republican primary was vocalized by delegates on the convention floor.

We “care about who is seated in all the chairs on the convention floor in Charlotte next year. We care about that because we care about ensuring a predetermined outcome in Charlotte.”

The announcement comes as Trump faces intense criticism and scrutiny for a July phone call in which he asked Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rival Joe Biden and his family. House Democrats have opened an impeachment inquiry into the president’s actions after learning about the call from a whistleblower.

(Reporting by Ginger Gibson; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

What do you think?

12 pledges
Upvote Downvote


newest oldest most voted
Notify of

ST, it pains me to contradict you on this, but, challengers to the president’s own party SHOULD be able to primary the standing president. When The Constitution was written, there were no political parties (as far as we know, wink, wink).

However, God forbid if the RNC adopts the DNC rules that screwed Bernie (secret sigh of relief….)

General Confusion

“Eliminating primaries makes a certain strategic sense.” I Ching

You are confused about primaries.

That only makes sense if your only goals are for expediency or to cut costs, not to make our political system as strong and robust of a democracy as possible. So what you are suggesting is that you are willing to sacrafice our strength as a nation over making it easy to keep a king on his throne.

That sounds like a very poor, even dangerous, decision.

General Confusion

“The rules of the party now reflect adequately that the will of the voters in the president’s party. This is not being done from a position of weakness,” one of the senior campaign officials said.” Article The RNC is confused about strength and weakness. The one thing that they USED to do was have a very robust primary challenge systen. At the moment, the DNCC has a weak primary system (whatever you do, DON’T primary an incumbent!). So, in effect, the RNC is now also doing the the main thing thing that makes the Democrats weak – no primaries (in… Read more »


Eliminating primaries makes a certain strategic sense. Why have $ or support split? q.v. the Dim primaries.

On the other hand, how much support do those like Walsh, Weld, Sanford, et al really have? Are they distractions and “spoilers”? It would be more convincing if a single one of them could highlight a meaningful political accomplishment. Crickets chirp.





Mitch McConnell

U.S. Republicans Join Democrats to Blast Trump’s Syria Withdrawal

U.S. Energy Secretary Denies Report About Plan to Resign