White House Asserts ‘Executive Privilege’ as House Panel Takes Aim at Barr

Last updated 05/08/2019 at 1:40 p.m. ET.

The White House on Wednesday took the aggressive step of invoking “executive privilege” to block the release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s full Russia report as a Democratic-led U.S. congressional panel moved toward holding Attorney General William Barr in contempt for refusing to hand over the document.

The move announced by the White House marked another intensification in a constitutional clash between the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives and Republican President Donald Trump. Barr has refused to comply with a subpoena by the House Judiciary Committee to provide an unredacted version of the report and its underlying evidence.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the top Democrat in Congress, said Trump’s moves to thwart subpoenas were obstructing oversight by lawmakers and inquiries into Russian interference to boost Trump’s candidacy in the 2016 U.S. election, the subject of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

“Every single day the president is making the case. He’s becoming self-impeachable,” Pelosi told the Washington Post, referring to the impeachment process in Congress to remove a president from office. Pelosi added that Barr, the top U.S. law enforcement official and a Trump appointee, should be held in contempt of Congress.

Barr last month released a redacted, 448-page version of Mueller’s report on the findings of his 22-month inquiry. Barr has refused to comply with a subpoena by the House Judiciary Committee for an unredacted version and its underlying evidence.

Executive privilege is sometimes claimed by U.S. presidents to keep other branches of government from getting access to information about internal executive branch information.

Democrats said the Trump administration waived executive privilege when it allowed some senior Trump advisers, including former White House Counsel Don McGahn, to talk to Mueller’s team during the investigation. The Justice Department said allowing such cooperation did not mean the administration relinquished the right to assert executive privilege now.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler said the White House was misapplying executive privilege in “a clear escalation in the Trump administration’s blanket defiance of Congress’s constitutionally mandated duties,” adding that neither Barr nor Trump should be permitted to be “above the law.”

A 1974 Supreme Court ruling made clear the contours of the doctrine of executive privilege. In the case U.S. v. Nixon, President Richard Nixon was ordered to deliver tapes and other subpoenaed materials to a federal judge for review. The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that a president’s right to privacy in his communications must be balanced against the power of Congress to investigate and oversee the executive branch.

The White House said Democrats forced the move. “Faced with Chairman Nadler’s blatant abuse of power, and at the attorney general’s request, the president has no other option than to make a protective assertion of executive privilege,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said.

House Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries, a member of the Judiciary Committee, told reporters that for the Trump administration to assert executive privilege now that the Mueller probe has run its course is “laughable, it’s frivolous, and it has no basis in reality.”

Trump is stonewalling numerous investigations by House Democrats, ranging from Mueller’s probe to other matters such as Trump’s tax returns, his past financial records and White House granting of high-level security clearances to members of his family. Court action is likely to follow.

The Judiciary Committee was slated to vote on a resolution recommending the full House find Barr in contempt of Congress. A contempt citation against Barr, who last week also refused to testify before the panel, could lead next to an enforcement action, either in the courts or in Congress, involving fines and possibly imprisonment.


Committee Republicans condemned the move to hold Barr in contempt. “What a cynical, mean-spirited, counterproductive and irresponsible step,” said Doug Collins, the committee’s top Republican.

Nadler subpoenaed the full document and all underlying evidence, saying lawmakers needed it to determine whether Trump obstructed justice by trying to impede the Mueller probe. Barr missed two subpoena deadlines for turning over the material, the latest on Monday.

When the House was controlled by Republicans, it voted in 2012 to hold Eric Holder, attorney general under Democratic President Barack Obama, in contempt for failing to turn over subpoenaed Justice Department documents about a gun-running investigation. It was the first time Congress had held any Cabinet member in contempt.

Mueller’s report details extensive contacts between Trump’s campaign and Moscow as well as the campaign’s expectation of benefiting from Russia’s actions. Mueller said there was not sufficient evidence to show a criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the campaign. The report also describes a series of actions Trump took to try to impede Mueller’s investigation.

On Tuesday, the Trump administration stymied a separate effort by House Judiciary Democrats to subpoena records from McGahn, directing him not to provide the documents. Mueller’s report said McGahn told investigators Trump unsuccessfully directed him to remove Mueller – an order he did not carry out – and then asked him to deny that Trump had done so.

(Reporting by David Morgan; Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell, Roberta Rampton, Sarah N. Lynch, Richard Cowan, Susan Cornwell and Susan Heavey; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Will Dunham)


  1. “Jabba the Hut” Nadler is demanding Barr break federal law in disclosing “grand jury” testimony! Nadler needs to be censured.

  2. I wonder if Piglosi and the rest of the Dumbos would be so hot for full-transperancy if one of ‘theirs’ was squatting in The White House.
    Sorry, Dumbos…Super O is now just a mouthpiece. The Swillary is now just an embarrassment. Biden is just a sad old wannabee. Who else have y’all got? Bonehead Bernie? Kamala-Lama-ding-dong?
    Nothing like an economy wrecker like Elizabitch Warren
    to sink the Ship of State.

    1. Remember when Bill Clinton was investigated by Special Prosecutor Ken Starr who then came up with ELEVEN felonies Clinton had committed; AND Nadler screamed the Starr report was to NOT be released? Different strokes for different folks per Dimwit Party rules.

    2. Hey, they got Bozo “the Planet will End in 8, 7, 6, 5 Years” O’Rourke – the fake Hispanic; Duke Nukem Swalwell and Cory “I’m going to screw up the rest of the USA like I did NJ” Booker.

  3. Funny how the articles writer fails to inform the reader of how Holder’s contempt citation was handled back in the day when Barry asserted EP and national security.

  4. How is it that most in MSM & on the left don’t understand that Nadler is trying to require that Barr break the law by GJ information? Further, it’s irresponsible to unredact sources & methods and could endanger IC personnel. You can’t get anymore transparent then what has been done unless Trump declassifies documents. I hope he starts with FISA & 302’s.

  5. Good move by Trump since Nadler had become a dictator with his illegal demands for the full, unredacted Mueller report. Nadler should know his demand was a violation of a law Congress – he is a part of – passed. Nadler was obviously attempting to set a trap for Barr for him (Barr) to violate the Law and be ripe for prosecution.

Comments are closed.