Trump Says U.S. Could Tax French Wine in Retaliation for Digital Tax

U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to tax French wines on Friday in retaliation for France’s recent proposal to levy a tax aimed at big U.S. technology companies.

Trump had told French President Emmanuel Macron last week that he was concerned about the proposed digital services tax.

“If anybody taxes them, it should be their home Country, the USA. We will announce a substantial reciprocal action on Macron’s foolishness shortly,” Trump tweeted on Friday. “I’ve always said American wine is better than French wine!”

Later in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters the tax decision was wrong and he threatened the key French export.

“They shouldn’t have done this,” Trump said. “I told them, I said, ‘Don’t do it because if you do it, I’m going to tax your wine.'”

He said a few minutes later that the U.S. response would be announced soon, saying that it “might be on wine, it might be on something else.”

Trump and Macron spoke by telephone on Friday and discussed the tax and next month’s summit of the Group of 7 rich nations in France, the White House said.

Macron’s office said the French leader “underlined that the G7 summit would be an important opportunity to move towards a universal taxation of digital activities, which is in our common interest, and which we need to keep working on in order to obtain a broad international agreement.”

The United States is by far the largest single export market for French wine and spirits, which is France’s second-biggest export after aerospace. The United States in 2018 accounted for nearly a quarter of all French wine exports, or 3.2 billion euros’ ($3.6 billion) worth.

French Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire said in a statement after Trump’s tweet that “the universal taxation of digital activities is a challenge that concerns all of us. We want to reach a deal on this within the framework of the G7 and the OECD. In the meantime, France will move ahead with national decisions.”

White House spokesman Judd Deere said the United States “is extremely disappointed by France’s decision to adopt a digital services tax at the expense of U.S. companies and workers. France’s unilateral measure appears to target innovative U.S. technology firms that provide services in distinct sectors of the economy.”

He added, “The administration is looking closely at all other policy tools.”

Two weeks ago, the French Senate approved the 3% levy that will apply to revenue from digital services earned in France by companies with more than 25 million euros in French revenue and 750 million euros ($834 million) worldwide.

Other EU countries, including Austria, Britain, Spain and Italy, have also announced plans for their own digital taxes.

They say a levy is needed because big, multinational internet companies such as Facebook and Amazon are able to book profits in low-tax countries like Ireland, no matter where the revenue originates.

Earlier this month, the United States threatened tariffs on an additional $4 billion worth of European Union goods, including wine, cheese and whiskey – that could be hit with tariffs as part of a nearly 15-year-long dispute at the World Trade Organization over aircraft subsidies given to U.S. planemaker Boeing Co and its European rival, Airbus SE.

The EU’s director general for trade, Sabine Weyand, this week said she expected the Trump administration to proceed to implement some of the tariffs after a WTO arbitrator ruled on the damage caused to Boeing as a result of illegal EU government aid to Airbus.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said France’s new digital services tax “targets U.S. firms almost exclusively and largely spares French companies.”

The U.S. Trade Representative’s Office (USTR) last month said it would hold a hearing on Aug. 19 in its probe of the planned tax, which could lead to the United States imposing new tariffs or other trade restrictions.

USTR could issue new tariffs on French goods after the public comment period closes on Aug. 26.

USTR said the levy was an “unreasonable tax policy.” The plan departs from tax norms because of “extraterritoriality; taxing revenue not income; and a purpose of penalizing particular technology companies for their commercial success,” it said.

The tax is due to apply retroactively from the start of 2019, which USTR said calls into question its fairness.

(Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington and Sarah White in Paris; Additional reporting by Tim Ahmann, Andrea Shalal and Steve Holland in Washington; Editing by Jonathan Oatis and Leslie Adler)


  1. American wines are better now because to vineyards are over 100 years old.

  2. I mainly drank beer and bourbon so I was just a drunk. I never wine because I never wanted to be called a WINO.

    1. In what part of the country is a :drunk” a step up from a “WINO”?

  3. Wine made in the US is better anyway, we don’t need French wine or anything else from the French.

    Paris? The city in an open sewer where the water is so bad and unhealthy you have to drink wine to keep from getting ill.

  4. We have helped other countries so much afuer the war, and this is the thanks they show us.

    1. When GW Bush invoked NATO Article 5 after 9/11. the FRANCE had troops in Afghanistan from 2001 until 2014 when NATO troops turned over defense to the Afghan government. When Bush/Cheney decided to invade Iraq in 2003, what has been universally been dubbed the worst foreign policy mistake in U.S. history, it was FRANCE that attempted to prevent the mistake from occurring. FRANCE is responsible for the military assistance that resulted in America’s INDEPENDENCE from England and the signing of the Treaty of Paris 1783 ending the Revolutionary War. What thanks do they owe America—a nation that may not have existed without them?

  5. California wines are as good, in some cases, better than French, but I don’t drink much wine anyway.

  6. I prefer the American red wines too!! French reds are too chalky!

  7. This is how business works. Evidently no other President thought of it. And also evidently these countries know he is serious.

    1. It is not disconcerting that a single IJR poster is unfamiliar with American history. 24 up votes indicates it is a serious problem.

  8. I say the E.U. can shove their tax. As a matter of fact, Im sick and tired of politicians that are being paid by us sitting around and doing nothing but thinking up ways to screw us out of MORE money.
    If they put as much effort into saving money as they do spending it there wouldn
    t be a need for MORE tax`s.

Comments are closed.