US Supreme Court’s Ginsburg to Miss Monday’s Oral Arguments

Jonathan Ernst/File Photo/Reuters

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be working from home and will not participate from the bench during the two scheduled oral arguments on Monday after undergoing surgery for lung cancer last month, a court spokeswoman said.

Ginsburg, 85, will instead use the case briefs and transcripts to participate in the cases, court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said. The liberal justice underwent surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York to remove two cancerous nodules in her left lung and was released from the hospital on Dec. 25.

Monday’s arguments in two cases were the first on the court’s schedule since Ginsburg underwent the procedure called a called a pulmonary lobectomy on Dec. 21. After the surgery, the court said there was no evidence of remaining disease.

It was the first time Ginsburg, one of the court’s nine justices, has missed oral arguments as a result of her various health scares, including two previous cancer diagnoses.

As the oldest justice, Ginsburg is closely watched for any signs of deteriorating health. Ginsburg, appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1993, also is the senior liberal member of the court, which has a 5-4 conservative majority.

Ginsburg broke three ribs in a fall in November. The nodules were found as part of the tests the justice underwent after the earlier fall, according to the court.

Ginsburg was treated in 1999 for colon cancer and again in 2009 for pancreatic cancer but did not miss any argument sessions either time. In 2014, doctors placed a stent in her right coronary artery to improve blood flow after she reported discomfort following routine exercise. She was released from a hospital the next day.

In recent years she has become something of a cult figure for liberals and known by the nickname “Notorious RBG,” after the late rapper Notorious BIG. A documentary film, “RBG,” and a feature film about her life, “On the Basis of Sex,” were released in 2018.

If Ginsburg were unable to continue serving, Trump could replace her with a conservative, further shifting the court to the right.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)

What do you think?

11 pledges
Upvote Downvote
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
WellHungChad
Member

The other rumor is that Ginsburg’s been dead for years and that Kagan and Sotomayor take turns sticking their hands up her ass to get her to walk and talk… ala, “Weekend at Bernie’s”.

WellHungChad
Member

The only problem is moving Ruth’s head out of the way to stick their hands in there!

WellHungChad
Member

Rumor has it that justices Kagan and Sotomayor have been donating their blood to Ginsburg for years and have the fang marks in their necks to prove it!

WellHungChad
Member

It doesn’t matter. She doesn’t need to hear the oral arguments, or even read the transcripts of the arguments. She’ll just ask herself, “what would a liberal progressive do?” Then vote that way. She’s been doing that way since Clinton gifted her a bench seat in ’93. She wasn’t qualified as a 4H live stock judge, let alone SCOTUS.

Morte206
Member

Let the countdown begin. It will be interesting to see the hysteria on The Hill when she passes. Trump is no lame duck so that argument against his nominee shouldn’t fly but one can be certain that the Dems will attempt to stall till after the 2020 election in the hopes they can name and place the next Justice.

Madison Dibble
Admin

It’s definitely better for Justice Ginsburg to miss one day of work than for her to rush back against doctor’s orders. I’m sure she’s not thrilled to be in the headlines, but it was probably the right call for her in the long run.

WellHungChad
Member

She should miss the remainder of lifetime from work. She’s nothing but a liberal rubber stamp. Legal qualifications, talent or knowledge have nothing to do with her being SCOTUS!

Bernie Sanders

Vermont Newspaper Begs Bernie Sanders Not to Run for President

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

After Struggling With Policy Questions, Ocasio-Cortez Claims It’s Better to Be ‘Morally Right’ Than Factual