• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
SCOTUS Decision: Kavanaugh, Barrett Side With Liberal Judges on Major Vaccine Case

SCOTUS Decision: Kavanaugh, Barrett Side With Liberal Judges on Major Vaccine Case

November 1, 2021
‘Not Just That Big Of A Factor’: GOP Lawmakers Shrug Off Musk’s Efforts To ‘Kill’ Trump Agenda

‘Not Just That Big Of A Factor’: GOP Lawmakers Shrug Off Musk’s Efforts To ‘Kill’ Trump Agenda

June 5, 2025
Trump Signs Proclamation Restricting Student Visas At Harvard

Trump Signs Proclamation Restricting Student Visas At Harvard

June 5, 2025
Trump Says Putin Told Him He Will Respond to Ukraine Attack on Russian Airfields

Trump Says Putin Told Him He Will Respond to Ukraine Attack on Russian Airfields

June 5, 2025
JENNY BETH MARTIN: Time For The Senate GOP To Grind Out Trump’s Nominees

JENNY BETH MARTIN: Time For The Senate GOP To Grind Out Trump’s Nominees

June 5, 2025
Biden Appears on ‘The View’ and Stumbles Over Questions About Kamala Harris

Trump Orders Investigation Into Biden’s Use of Autopen

June 5, 2025
Several US Companies Blocked By Trump Admin From Trading With China: Report

Trump Signs Ban on Entry for 12 Countries

June 5, 2025
Trump Admin Effectively Bars Foreign Students From Harvard

Trump Admin Effectively Bars Foreign Students From Harvard

June 5, 2025
Trump Orders Probe Into Biden’s Presidential Actions

Trump Orders Probe Into Biden’s Presidential Actions

June 4, 2025
Trump Enacts Travel Ban Covering 12 Countries

Trump Enacts Travel Ban Covering 12 Countries

June 4, 2025
Harvard Speaker With CCP-Linked Family Denies Nepotism Got Her Into Ivy League

Harvard Speaker With CCP-Linked Family Denies Nepotism Got Her Into Ivy League

June 4, 2025
‘It’s Disgusting’: Voters Are Furious With Gavin Newsom For Pulling Rug From Under Passed Ballot Measure

‘It’s Disgusting’: Voters Are Furious With Gavin Newsom For Pulling Rug From Under Passed Ballot Measure

June 4, 2025
California Defends High-Speed Rail Boondoggle By Saying It Will Take 20 Years To Finish ‘Initial’ Segment

California Defends High-Speed Rail Boondoggle By Saying It Will Take 20 Years To Finish ‘Initial’ Segment

June 4, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • State of the Union
  • Elon Musk
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Thursday, June 5, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home Commentary

SCOTUS Decision: Kavanaugh, Barrett Side With Liberal Judges on Major Vaccine Case

by Western Journal
November 1, 2021 at 8:27 am
in Commentary
242 10
0
SCOTUS Decision: Kavanaugh, Barrett Side With Liberal Judges on Major Vaccine Case

Supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on September 27, 2018. - University professor Christine Blasey Ford, 51, told a tense Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that could make or break Kavanaugh's nomination she was "100 percent" certain he was the assailant and it was "absolutely not" a case of mistaken identify. (Photo by Andrew Harnik / POOL / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW HARNIK/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a 6-3 decision on Friday, the Supreme Court ruled against a group of Maine health care workers seeking a religious exemption from the state’s vaccine mandate. They had submitted an emergency application for injunctive relief.

Their stated reason for the exemption is that “fetal tissue from terminated pregnancies was used in developing the approved vaccines,” according to The National Review. “The plaintiffs see immunization as an implicit endorsement of abortion, in violation of their religious beliefs.”

Conservatives were alarmed to learn that Trump appointees, Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, had sided with the progressive wing of the Court.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who stopped being a reliable conservative vote a long time ago, also joined the liberals in denying the preliminary injunction.

In August, Maine Gov. Janet Mills announced that health care workers in the state must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by October 1.

In 2019, 73 percent of voters in the state supported the repeal of religious and philosophical exemptions from the laws governing immunization requirements, according to The New York Times. (Exemptions are still granted if a health care professional considers a vaccine to be “medically inadvisable” for an individual.)

Barrett, joined by Kavanaugh, wrote a concurring opinion based on the fact that “the case was brought on the shadow docket, or as an emergency appeal. Shadow docket cases do not involve oral arguments or full rulings that are part of normal cases. Barrett said the shadow docket should not be used for such a case, and that the court should not make this decision ‘on a short fuse without benefit of full briefing and oral argument,’ implying she and Kavanaugh could vote differently if the case came before the court in a different way,” according to Business Insider.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, also a Trump appointee, joined Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito in dissent.

Gorsuch points out that, “Unlike comparable rules in most other States, Maine’s rule contains no exemption for those whose sincerely held religious beliefs preclude them from accepting the vaccination.”

“Yet, with Maine’s new rule coming into effect, one of the applicants has already lost her job for refusing to betray her faith; another risks the imminent loss of his medical practice.”

He also reminds us that the plaintiffs “have served patients on the front line of the COVID–19 pandemic with bravery and grace for 18 months now.”

Barrett’s and Kavanaugh’s concurrence with the majority in this case has some of us wondering why Republicans fought so hard for their confirmations.

It should be noted that in August, Barrett disappointed conservatives by rejecting a request from a group of Indiana University students who were seeking an exemption from the school’s vaccine mandate.

While Supreme Court justices take an oath to “impartially discharge” their duties, there’s obviously a reason why confirmation hearings have become so politically fraught. Those who had expected years of conservative safeguard from leftist tyranny after Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett joined the Court have been sorely disappointed.

The National Review’s Andrew McCarthy, who is a former assistant U.S. attorney, finds it troubling that Barrett and Kavanaugh ignored the First Amendment in their concurrence.

He writes: “What is stunning, and will be troubling for conservatives, is the decision by Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh to side with the progressives and turn a blind eye to a state government’s suppression of a fundamental freedom that the Constitution is supposed to protect. And equally troubling: the thin gruel they offer as a rationale.”

Still, it’s possible conservatives are overreacting, at least in this case.

Adam Liptak who follows the Supreme Court for The New York Times sees their concurrence differently. Rather than viewing it through a political lens, he offers more practical reasons for their decisions.

He believes it served “a dual purpose: of indicating that the two justices were not signaling how they would vote if the question reached the court in a more deliberate fashion and of cautioning litigants against the overuse of what critics call the court’s ‘shadow docket.'”

Although it might be too soon to sound the alarm, conservatives will be watching Barrett’s and Kavanaugh’s future decisions closely.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Tags: Amy Coney BarrettBrett KavanaughconservativesMaineSupreme CourtU.S. Newsvaccine
Do you believe Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh were wrong to deny a preliminary injunction to the Maine health care workers?

Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yes: 83% (5 Votes)
No: 17% (1 Votes)
Share196Tweet123
Western Journal

Western Journal

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th