• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
Appeals Court Affirms Biden Likely Violated First Amendment While ‘Suppressing’ Information on Social Media

Appeals Court Affirms Biden Likely Violated First Amendment While ‘Suppressing’ Information on Social Media

September 10, 2023
EXCLUSIVE: Small Biz Chief Pledges Zero Tolerance For Fraud After Biden Mission Drift

EXCLUSIVE: Small Biz Chief Pledges Zero Tolerance For Fraud After Biden Mission Drift

June 14, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: VA Will Save ‘Literally Millions Of Dollars’ By Scrapping Sex Changes, Sec Says

EXCLUSIVE: VA Will Save ‘Literally Millions Of Dollars’ By Scrapping Sex Changes, Sec Says

June 14, 2025
Authorities Identify Suspect In Assassination Of Minnesota Lawmaker

Authorities Identify Suspect In Assassination Of Minnesota Lawmaker

June 14, 2025
SEN. STEVE DAINES AND REP. STEVE WOMACK: Congress Should Be Able To Ban Flag Burning

SEN. STEVE DAINES AND REP. STEVE WOMACK: Congress Should Be Able To Ban Flag Burning

June 14, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: Thune Says Trump Nominees Are Being Confirmed At Rapid Pace Despite ‘Historic’ Obstruction

EXCLUSIVE: Thune Says Trump Nominees Are Being Confirmed At Rapid Pace Despite ‘Historic’ Obstruction

June 14, 2025
Democratic State Lawmaker, Husband Killed In ‘Politically-Motivated Assassination’

Democratic State Lawmaker, Husband Killed In ‘Politically-Motivated Assassination’

June 14, 2025
CASEY RYAN: Accreditors Wield Power To End DEI In Schools

CASEY RYAN: Accreditors Wield Power To End DEI In Schools

June 14, 2025
How NYC’s Little-Understood Voting System Could Lead To A Socialist Mayor

How NYC’s Little-Understood Voting System Could Lead To A Socialist Mayor

June 14, 2025
DAVID BLACKMON: Trump Ends Newsom’s Terrible Week By Killing His EV Mandate

DAVID BLACKMON: Trump Ends Newsom’s Terrible Week By Killing His EV Mandate

June 14, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: VA Sec Says Days Of Unions, Contractors Owning His Agency Are Over

EXCLUSIVE: VA Sec Says Days Of Unions, Contractors Owning His Agency Are Over

June 13, 2025
LA News Outlet Caught In Lie That ICE Targeted Pregnant Woman. It Really Went After Her Illegal Husband.

LA News Outlet Caught In Lie That ICE Targeted Pregnant Woman. It Really Went After Her Illegal Husband.

June 13, 2025
‘My Blood Is Boiling’: Dem Strategist Melts Down Over Alex Padilla Getting Booted From Noem Presser

‘My Blood Is Boiling’: Dem Strategist Melts Down Over Alex Padilla Getting Booted From Noem Presser

June 13, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • State of the Union
  • Elon Musk
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Sunday, June 15, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Appeals Court Affirms Biden Likely Violated First Amendment While ‘Suppressing’ Information on Social Media

by Western Journal
September 10, 2023
in News
237 15
0
Appeals Court Affirms Biden Likely Violated First Amendment While ‘Suppressing’ Information on Social Media

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 06: U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks to an audience of leaders from the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) and the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) during an event to congratulate them on finalizing a new labor contract in the State Dining Room at the White House on September 06, 2023 in Washington, DC. Biden talked about his administration's efforts to alleviate supply chain bottlenecks and its work to support workers and ports. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans has ruled on Friday that the Biden administration may have run afoul of the First Amendment in its efforts to exert pressure on social media platforms regarding contentious COVID-19 content.

This ruling has sparked debate over the government’s role in regulating online speech.

A panel of judges, all GOP nominees, concluded that the White House, health officials, and the FBI may have infringed on First Amendment rights by pressuring technology companies to suppress or remove content related to COVID-19 and the 2020 election, Fox news reported.

The judges argued, in their 75-page verdict, that these efforts amounted to coercion, potentially violating free speech rights.

The panel of judges, which is made up of two Bush nominees and one Trump nominee, asserted that it is inappropriate for President Biden, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the FBI, and the surgeon general to exert pressure on social media platforms to remove content they deemed troublesome.

They did, however, overturn a previous Louisiana judge’s ruling that prohibited the government from contacting social media platforms to encourage content removal.

The court’s decision now gives the administration ten days to seek a Supreme Court review, leaving the fate of this case in the hands of the highest court in the land, Bloomberg Law reported.

“The officials have engaged in a broad pressure campaign designed to coerce social-media companies into suppressing speakers, viewpoints, and content disfavored by the government,” the three-judge panel wrote.

“The harms that radiate from such conduct extend far beyond just the Plaintiffs; it impacts every social-media user.”

Nevertheless, this order narrows the scope of the injunction that had previously targeted the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services, according to the NPR.

The new ruling applies exclusively to the White House, the surgeon general, the CDC, and the FBI.

This case originated from a lawsuit filed by the states of Missouri and Louisiana, a conservative website owner, and four individuals who held dissenting views regarding the establishment’s COVID-19 policies, according to Fox News.

They accused government officials of coercing social media platforms into removing content covering topics like election fraud, the FBI’s handling of Hunter Biden’s laptop, and the COVID-19 pandemic, USA Today reported.

Fifth Circuit just unanimously affirmed Judge Doughty’s injunction against White House, CDC, FBI and others — giving Americans and #FreedomOfSpeech a major win against censorship, totalitarianism, and Biden. #FirstAmendment

— AG Jeff Landry (@AGJeffLandry) September 8, 2023

Viewed by many as at least a partial victory for conservatives, the court’s ruling also found that the administration had used “intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences” to coerce social media platforms into making content moderation decisions, which the court deemed a violation free speech right.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry hailed the decision on X, formerly Twitter, as a “major win against censorship,” emphasizing that it underscores the importance of protecting freedom of speech regardless of political ideology.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey also took to X to celebrate the ruling, posting: “The Fifth Circuit has upheld the district court’s order in our free speech case, Missouri v. Biden, enjoining the White House, Surgeon General, CDC, & FBI from violating the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans.”

?BREAKING: The Fifth Circuit has upheld the district court’s order in our free speech case, Missouri v. Biden, enjoining the White House, Surgeon General, CDC, & FBI from violating the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans.

— Attorney General Andrew Bailey (@AGAndrewBailey) September 8, 2023

In response to the ruling, the White House said in a statement, “DOJ is reviewing the court’s decision and will evaluate its options in this case.”

The administration reiterated its stance that social media platforms should take responsibility for the impact of their platforms on the American people while making independent choices about the information they present, according to USA Today.

“Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people, but make independent choices about the information they present.”

However, the Fifth Circuit did also criticize the injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Terry A. Doughty, a Trump nominee, as “overbroad” and potentially limiting legal government actions.

The appeals court highlighted that many provisions in the injunction were “duplicative” and “unnecessary.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Tags: 2020 Electionattorney generalBiden administrationCampaigncensorshipconservativesCourtDemocratsFBIFirst AmendmentFox NewsFree SpeechFreedomJoe BidenpoliticsU.S. News
Share196Tweet123
Western Journal

Western Journal

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th