Disturbing messages exchanged between two caregivers took center stage in a Canadian courtroom as prosecutors wrapped up their case in the death of a 12-year-old foster child.
According to the New York Post, during closing arguments, officials alleged that Becky Hamber and Brandy Cooney mocked and tormented the boy in the days leading up to his death in December 2022.
Jurors were shown text messages the couple allegedly sent to each other, including one that read, “shiver shiver dumb f**k,” which prosecutors said highlighted a pattern of cruelty.
The child, identified only as “LL,” was later found in the basement of their Ontario home, soaked, severely underweight, and unresponsive. He was pronounced dead shortly afterward.
Authorities testified that the boy appeared far smaller than his age, roughly the size of a typical 6-year-old. Investigators believe he may have died from hypothermia or cardiac arrest linked to malnourishment.
Prosecutors pointed to additional messages sent about a month before the boy’s death, arguing they showed the couple was aware of the harm being done.
“Unfortunately my thoughts [are] he is suddenly going to die and im going to jail,” Cooney allegedly texted her wife.
The pair has pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, including murder, failing to provide the necessities of life, assault with a weapon, and confinement.
Testimony during the trial painted a grim picture of the children’s living conditions.
A social worker told the court that the boy often slept on a cot covered in vomit that was only wiped down, not properly cleaned. She recalled that there was frequently “vomit everywhere” during her visits.
“They admitted [LL] was 48 pounds,” the social worker testified. “But stated it was because he would throw up food, chew it again, and lick it off the floor.”
Prosecutors also alleged the children were isolated, forced to wear wetsuits and hockey helmets, and deprived of blankets. Instead, they were reportedly encouraged to exercise to stay warm.
Defense attorneys argued the couple acted in the children’s best interest, claiming they faced significant behavioral challenges and were regularly monitored by professionals who never raised concerns.
The trial, which began in September, will be decided by a judge, as no jury is involved.
