The biggest names in Hollywood gathered Sunday night for the 2025 Emmy Awards. The stars were shining. The speeches were flowing. But one name was nowhere to be heard.
Charlie Kirk.
Just days after the shocking assassination of the conservative activist, not a single tribute, mention, or moment of silence made it into the nationally televised broadcast. The silence wasn’t just loud — it was deafening.
Kirk was gunned down last week while speaking to students at Utah Valley University. The attack sent shockwaves through the political world and left many asking whether political rhetoric had gone too far. But when Hollywood had its biggest night of the year, it chose a different focus.
The tone at the Emmys leaned heavily into progressive causes — not unity, not healing, and not reflection.
Hannah Einbinder, co-star of Hacks, closed her acceptance speech with the words, “F*** ICE and free Palestine.” Her co-star, Megan Stalter, appeared on the red carpet holding a handbag that read, “CEASE FIRE.” No one stopped them. The crowd cheered.
The Emmys made ZERO reference to Charlie Kirk who was assassinated.
Instead #Hacks actress Hannah Einbinder after her win: “F**k ICE and Free Palestine”This is the Hollywood left.pic.twitter.com/r95IrbXquK
— TheRealMrBench (@therealmrbench) September 15, 2025
Bryan Cranston, presenting later in the show, made a jab at Trump by mocking his recent comments about “woke degenerates” like actor Tom Hanks. The moment drew laughter, but the message wasn’t lost.
While some winners delivered vague calls for kindness and strength, there was no clear response to the national grief many viewers were feeling after Kirk’s murder. No moment of pause. No gesture toward unity from a crowd that often speaks about empathy.
Instead, the night moved forward as if the tragedy hadn’t happened at all.
No one expected The Emmys to call for a moment of silence for Charlie Kirk.
And no one was disappointed in that regard.
Because NOT ONE PERSON had a thing to say about what happened.
About WHAT THEIR COMPATRIOT DID.
Sure, Bryan Cranston joked about “woke degenerates.”
And…
— Byl Holte (@SirBylHolte) September 15, 2025
Stephen Colbert accepted his Emmy with a speech about “loss” and love for his country — words that many interpreted as a quiet acknowledgment of the nation’s turbulence. But he never mentioned Kirk by name. The loss he described remained abstract.
Mary Steenburgen, receiving the Bob Hope Humanitarian Award with husband Ted Danson, said the world feels “out of balance,” adding, “We don’t want to live in fear.” Again, heartfelt words. But no direct connection to what millions of Americans had witnessed just days earlier.
The only public figure to come close to addressing the moment’s heaviness was Television Academy Chair Cris Abrego, who spoke of “division” and the power of storytelling to bring people together. “Neutrality is not enough,” he said. “We must be voices for connection.”
Still, the silence around Kirk’s death hung over the event. For many watching at home, it wasn’t just what was said — but what wasn’t.
CHARLIE KIRK FANS SLAM EMMYS FOR SNUBBING TRIBUTE
Conservatives erupted after the 2025 Emmys failed to acknowledge Charlie Kirk’s assassination, despite weaving political messages into the show.
Fans blasted Hollywood as evil and a joke, pointing out that while the… https://t.co/lLdIfW6qbp pic.twitter.com/bgX3cSIliR
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) September 15, 2025
CHARLIE KIRK FANS SLAM EMMYS FOR SNUBBING TRIBUTEOne person who made a point to avoid politics entirely was host Nate Bargatze. The Christian comedian, known for his clean stand-up and family-friendly appeal, stuck to his promise to keep the show light. He didn’t mention politics. He didn’t mention religion. And he didn’t mention Kirk.
Bargatze told Fox News before the show that he wanted to make the night “as relaxing as it can be” for everyone, no matter their background or beliefs. “It doesn’t matter what religion you are. It doesn’t matter what your politics are,” he said. “That’s not what this is about.”
But the message coming from much of the Emmys stage seemed clear: politics was on the table — just not for everyone.
As tributes poured in from across the political spectrum in the days following Kirk’s murder, the absence of any mention at the Emmys left many wondering:
Was this silence intentional?
Or was it just business as usual in Hollywood, where some tragedies get spotlighted — and others get left in the dark?
One thing’s certain: in a time when the country is mourning, remembering, and searching for answers, millions tuned in hoping for something more.
And instead, they got… nothing.
