• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
House Passes Two Democratic-Backed Gun Control Bills

Commentary: Feinstein Comes Back with New 'Assault Weapons' Bill, Bans 205 Guns by Name

March 14, 2021
Supreme Court Will Not Hear 2nd Amendment Challenges 

Supreme Court Will Not Hear 2nd Amendment Challenges 

June 2, 2025
‘It’s A Good Start’: Trump’s NIH Takes Step To Hold Risky Research Labs Accountable

‘It’s A Good Start’: Trump’s NIH Takes Step To Hold Risky Research Labs Accountable

June 2, 2025
Andrew Cuomo’s Campaign Attorney Targets Union That Made A List Of ‘Top Ten Reasons’ Not To Vote For Him

Andrew Cuomo’s Campaign Attorney Targets Union That Made A List Of ‘Top Ten Reasons’ Not To Vote For Him

June 2, 2025
‘Habitual Lawbreakers’: ICE Rolls Up Hundreds Of Illegal Migrant Criminals In Sprawling Blue State Operation

‘Habitual Lawbreakers’: ICE Rolls Up Hundreds Of Illegal Migrant Criminals In Sprawling Blue State Operation

June 2, 2025
NEWT GINGRICH: Do We Really Want Waste And Fraud In Medicaid?

NEWT GINGRICH: Do We Really Want Waste And Fraud In Medicaid?

June 2, 2025
Egg Prices Have Dropped 61% Since Trump Took Office

Egg Prices Have Dropped 61% Since Trump Took Office

June 2, 2025
‘Reckless’: Mike Huckabee Slams Media For Pushing Hamas ‘Propaganda’ Hours Before Colorado Terror Attack

‘Reckless’: Mike Huckabee Slams Media For Pushing Hamas ‘Propaganda’ Hours Before Colorado Terror Attack

June 2, 2025
Fed Offers Up Prediction That Spells Good News For Trump’s Economy

Fed Offers Up Prediction That Spells Good News For Trump’s Economy

June 2, 2025
Climate Activist Greta Thunberg Sets Sail for Gaza

Climate Activist Greta Thunberg Sets Sail for Gaza

June 2, 2025
Illinois Dems Lay Budget Woes At Trump’s Feet After Taxing Their Citizens Into Ground

Illinois Dems Lay Budget Woes At Trump’s Feet After Taxing Their Citizens Into Ground

June 2, 2025
Dem Senator Really Doesn’t Like Showing Up To Work On Mondays

Dem Senator Really Doesn’t Like Showing Up To Work On Mondays

June 2, 2025
Scott Jennings Shuts Down Podcast Host’s Claim That Political Violence Comes From ‘Both Sides’

Scott Jennings Shuts Down Podcast Host’s Claim That Political Violence Comes From ‘Both Sides’

June 2, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • State of the Union
  • Elon Musk
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Monday, June 2, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home Wire

Commentary: Feinstein Comes Back with New 'Assault Weapons' Bill, Bans 205 Guns by Name

by Western Journal
March 14, 2021 at 12:34 pm
in Wire
240 12
4
House Passes Two Democratic-Backed Gun Control Bills

FILE PHOTO: AR-15 rifles are displayed for sale at the Guntoberfest gun show in Oaks, Pennsylvania, U.S., October 6, 2017. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

“Assault weapon” is a dangerous, menacing two-word construct that sounds like something the government should step in and immediately ban. Unfortunately, it means nothing.

If you go to your local gun shop, they won’t be selling any “assault weapons.” And it’s not like they’ll be advertising them under a friendlier name — “extra-strength firearms” or what-have-you — because the category doesn’t actually exist. An “assault weapon” is essentially what liberals want to call an assault weapon, usually because it’s a rifle and it looks scary.

And, it seems, Sen. Dianne Feinstein has found an awful lot of weapons that look scary — 205, to be exact.

On Thursday, the California Democrat introduced a promised piece of legislation that would ban “military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines,” a media release from her office stated. It comes on the heels of the House of Representatives passing bills that would establish a nationwide background check program. Both of these are agenda items on President Joe Biden’s proposed suite of gun-control measures, along with stripping gun manufacturers from immunity from lawsuits over legally manufactured and sold firearms.

“It’s been 17 years since the original Assault Weapons Ban expired, and the plague of gun violence continues to grow in this country,” Feinstein’s media release stated.

“To be clear, this bill saves lives. When it was in place from 1994-2004, gun massacres declined by 37 percent compared with the decade before. After the ban expired, the number of massacres rose by 183 percent. We’re now seeing a rise in domestic terrorism, and military-style assault weapons are increasingly becoming the guns of choice for these dangerous groups.”

Pretty much none of this is true. While supporters of the original 1994 bill (authored by Feinstein, because of course) claim a reduction in deaths and massacres while it was in force, even reliably liberal PolitiFact notes “[t]he ban’s impact remains unclear,” the data can be interpreted in a number of ways and no direct causal effect between the ban and lower rates of gun violence or “massacres” can be drawn.

Nevertheless, Feinstein’s pushing forward with a bill similar to her 1994 legislation, one that specifically targets weapons by their marketing names.

As Jacob Sullum notes at Reason, the legislation only requires one “military-style” characteristic for the weapon to be banned; in 1994, you needed two to ban the gun. Feinstein’s legislation also takes an expansive view of what constitutes a “military-style” characteristic, including a “forward grip,” “pistol grip,” “threaded barrel,” “barrel shroud” and (yes) “grenade launcher.”

While widespread use of grenade launchers is generally confined to Xbox games, a barrel shroud — a covering that prevents a gun user from accidentally touching a hot barrel — is hardly a “military-style” gun characteristic.

While there are tweaks, additions and omissions from the original 1994 legislation and Feinstein’s other attempts at similar legislation — the most recent was 2019 — the biggest issue is that it’s much stricter on how many “military-style” characteristics you’re allowed. Namely, none. “High-capacity ammunition magazines” would also be capped at 10 rounds.

However, the bill would grandfather in weapons and magazines that have already been purchased, something Sullum pointed out indicated Feinstein didn’t believe her own language.

“Like the 1994 law, it does not prohibit possession of ‘assault weapons,’ meaning that millions of ‘these deadly weapons’ will remain in circulation even if compliance is perfect,” Sullum wrote.

“That grandfather clause makes no sense if Feinstein really believes what she says. Her bill ‘exempts by name more than 2,200 guns for hunting, household defense or recreational purposes’ — a completely gratuitous list that is supposed to show us how moderate and generous she is. But according to Feinstein, the guns she wants to ban are good for nothing but mass murder. The millions of Americans who own them for lawful purposes probably will disagree.”

And that presents another issue: The Supreme Court’s ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller, which stated firearms in “common use for lawful purposes like self-defense” could not be banned under the Second Amendment. These are some of the most commonly owned weapons in the United States. You might even have one (or several) in your gun safe.

“The legislation would still make the most commonly-sold centerfire rifles in the United States off-limits to future buyers, as well as imposing a ban on the most commonly-owned ammunition magazines in the country as well,” Cam Edwards wrote at Bearing Arms.

“That clearly contradicts what the Supreme Court has said in the past; arms that are in common use for a variety of lawful purposes are protected by the Second Amendment.”

This, of course, assumes Feinstein’s bill has any chance of passing. Unless the Democrats nuke the filibuster and getting all 50 senators in their conference on board with this, it’s dead on arrival. Of course, if they decide this is the moment they’re going to ditch the filibuster, we’re going to have bigger problems than barrel shrouds and pistol grips.

It’s telling, however, that this meaningless piece of legislation — which arbitrarily redefines what weapons we can buy based on things that look scary as opposed to conferring any practical advantage to a mass shooter or “domestic terrorist” — has appeared so quickly in the Biden administration.

If this kind of empty symbolism is how the Democrats plan to govern, expect our Second Amendment rights to be under unceasing attack for the foreseeable future.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Tags: Dianne FeinsteinGun control
Share196Tweet123
Western Journal

Western Journal

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th