Well, there it is. The House of Representatives, in all its swampy glory, just voted against formally reprimanding Del. Stacey Plaskett—yes, the same Stacey Plaskett who allegedly communicated with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 Oversight Committee hearing. Because nothing says “principled leadership” like shrugging off ties to one of the most notorious predators of our time.
BOMBSHELL REPORT
Newly released documents show convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was texting with Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands) in real-time during Michael Cohen’s 2019 Congressional testimony.
The texts, reviewed by The Washington Post, show Epstein appeared… pic.twitter.com/fyzegQG2YM
— ConsciousInk (@ink_conscious) November 15, 2025
BOMBSHELL REPORTThe vote was 209-214. Not exactly a nail-biter, but just close enough to sting. And wouldn’t you know it, three House Republicans decided this was their moment to be “bipartisan.” Reps. Don Bacon (Nebraska), Lance Gooden (Texas), and Dave Joyce (Ohio) all joined Democrats in voting against the reprimand. Then there were the three who voted “present,” which in Congress-speak basically means, “please don’t make me pick sides because I might upset someone at a fundraiser.”
Now let’s back up for a second. Plaskett, a non-voting delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, was caught up in some seriously eyebrow-raising revelations after documents from the Epstein estate showed she had exchanged texts with him. Her defense? Epstein was a constituent. Apparently, in her eyes, constituent services now include casual chats with an alleged human trafficker—who just so happened to be under federal investigation at the time, but hey, “that wasn’t public knowledge,” so let’s all pretend it never happened.
On the House floor, Plaskett gave what can only be described as a bizarre justification for her behavior, comparing her information-gathering efforts to questioning murderers and confidential informants. That’s certainly one way to spin it. “I want the truth,” she said—although oddly, when people started asking questions about her truth, the pushback came fast and furious.
Republicans aren’t buying it. They argued that her contact with Epstein was more than just a passing text, and that it influenced her questioning during the 2019 hearing. And honestly, given the political witch hunts we’ve seen from Democrats over far less suspicious behavior, the idea that this doesn’t warrant a formal reprimand is… rich.
Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) brought the resolution forward using a fast-track process—probably because waiting around for committees to act on anything in Washington is like expecting CNN to say something nice about Donald Trump. Norman made it clear: “Standing against a convicted predator’s influence in our proceedings is not partisan. It’s basic decency.” Apparently, that was too high a bar for some lawmakers.
To add insult to injury, the resolution also would’ve removed Plaskett from the House Intelligence Committee—because, yes, someone accused of communicating with Epstein probably shouldn’t be sitting on that committee. But that step, we’re told, was just “a bridge too far” for certain members. Heaven forbid we set any boundaries.
Meanwhile, in a totally-not-petty move, Democrats fired back by introducing a measure to censure Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.) over a now-withdrawn allegation of assault and a legal dispute stemming from a past relationship. But wouldn’t you know it—that measure is likely to disappear into the void now that Plaskett’s reprimand has failed. It’s like a toddler swatting at a sibling because they didn’t get their way.
So what’s really going on here? According to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), “they’re brokering back-end deals to avoid bringing forward justice in both Democrat and Republican chambers.” And honestly? She might be right. This whole episode has MAGA Republicans fuming—and for good reason. If Republicans can’t even hold someone accountable for allegedly cozying up to Epstein, what exactly are they there for?
.@RepLuna after house failed to censure Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.):
“I was wondering if the Speaker of the House of Representatives can explain why leadership on both sides are cutting back-end deals to cover-up public corruption in the House of Representatives from both… pic.twitter.com/rrEnlt61I7
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 19, 2025
The entire fiasco sends a message loud and clear: political protection still outweighs principle in the halls of Congress. If this had been a Republican caught texting Epstein? The outrage would’ve melted the paint off the Capitol dome. But because it’s a Democrat—and a delegate who’s been a loyal voice in the anti-Trump chorus—suddenly we’re supposed to look the other way?
In 2025, with President Trump back in the White House and Vice President J.D. Vance bringing actual accountability to Washington, this kind of nonsense is what conservatives were hoping we’d start cleaning up. But it seems the swamp doesn’t drain itself.
So here we are—business as usual in the people’s House. One side shielding their own, the other side fighting uphill battles just to get the basics of accountability through the door. And the American people? They’re left watching, shaking their heads, wondering how “don’t text with Epstein” became a partisan issue.
The post House Vote To Censure Plaskett Fails appeared first on Red Right Patriot.
