Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, is accusing two Democratic House members of lying.
During a House Oversight Committee hearing on corruption allegations involving the Biden family, Bobulinski took aim at Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) and Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.)
“Rep. Dan Goldman and Jamie Raskin, both lawyers, and Mr. Goldman, a former prosecutor with the SDNY from New York, will continue to lie today in this hearing and then go straight to the media to tell more lies. Hunter Biden’s defense attorney, Abbe Lowell, weaponized his letters to Congress to try to smear my name,” the former business pattern claimed.
Raskin was heard attempting to interject, “Mr. Chairman…”
Bobulinski pressed on, “In an attempt to save his powerfully connected client and his father. I challenge Mr. Lowell to make those claims on national television so he can be held accountable for his lies. Prior to my successful business career, I was an officer in the United States Navy at Navy’s elite Naval Nuclear Power Training Command. I later served as the chief, the command’s chief technology officer…”
Watch the video below:
Delusional Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin — who spends nearly every waking moment floating conspiracy theories and making excuses for the Biden family's corruption — did NOT like being called out for his lies.pic.twitter.com/ShTVBiKAzM
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 20, 2024
Eventually, he paused and looked up from his prepared remarks.
“Please proceed. I apologize for the disruption from the minority,” the committee’s chairman Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) said.
Bobulinski asked, “Am I supposed to say it’s my time, Mr. Raskin?”
“Mr. Bobulinski, please proceed. Please proceed. I apologize for the disruption from the minority,” Comer responded.
However, Raskin interjected, “Well, Mr. Chairman, save his time, but he called members of this committee liars. And I just want to know whether the order and decorum requirements of House Rule 11 apply to witnesses appearing before the committee. Does it apply or does it not?”
After several seconds, Comer answered, “There’s decorum from the members. We’ve asked for that. There’s no language that I’m aware of pertaining to a witness.”
“Thank you,” Raskin responded.
