US Government Proposes Rolling Back Protections for Big Tech
The Justice Department proposal would seek to push platforms to "address" illicit content online, such as material that violates federal criminal law.
Read moreDetailsThe Justice Department proposal would seek to push platforms to "address" illicit content online, such as material that violates federal criminal law.
Read moreDetailsLawyers for the Justice Department and Flynn will each argue before a federal appeals court.
Read moreDetails"I'm not sure what he's saying."
Read moreDetails"No one has ever been criminally prosecuted for unmasking."
Read moreDetails"Through this indictment, the United States has signified its commitment to hampering North Korea’s ability to illegally access the U.S. financial system."
Read moreDetailsA roughly $45 million scheme.
Read moreDetailsThe probe ordered by FBI Director Christopher Wray will "determine whether any current employees engaged in misconduct" in the investigation of Flynn.
Read moreDetailsBurr has denied any wrongdoing.
Read moreDetailsThe case touched off a furor in the southeastern Georgia community of Brunswick and among civil rights activists nationwide.
Read moreDetailsThe federal government is tackling hoarding and price gouging to obtain more medical supplies.
Read moreDetailsAn appeals court sided with the House Judiciary Committee.
Read moreDetails"He has his limits."
Read moreDetails"Those actions, and the damage they have done to the Department of Justice's reputation for integrity and the rule of law, require Mr. Barr to resign."
Read moreDetailsDemocratic senators aren't buying Bill Barr's criticism of the president.
Read moreDetails"Congratulations to Attorney General Bill Barr for taking charge."
Read moreDetails"I stay out of things."
Read moreDetails"State enforcement is critically important for competition and consumers."
Read moreDetails"The Court understands the government to have concluded, in view of the material misstatements and omissions, that the Court's authorizations ... were not valid."
Read moreDetails"Mr. Barr’s conduct appears to run afoul of the ‘very special obligations’ that he himself professed to recognize during his 1991 and 2019 Senate confirmation hearings."
Read moreDetails