• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
The Consummate Deal-Maker: Trump Tells Supreme Court He Wants To Resolve Tik-Tok Controversy

The Consummate Deal-Maker: Trump Tells Supreme Court He Wants To Resolve Tik-Tok Controversy

December 27, 2024
Energy Secretary Chris Wright Says Trump Admin Has Trick Up Its Sleeve To Ease Oil Price Rise Amid Iran Conflict

Energy Secretary Chris Wright Says Trump Admin Has Trick Up Its Sleeve To Ease Oil Price Rise Amid Iran Conflict

March 15, 2026
Synagogue Attacker’s Brother Was Hezbollah Commander, Israel Claims

Synagogue Attacker’s Brother Was Hezbollah Commander, Israel Claims

March 15, 2026
‘Why Would You Wanna Punish All These Workers?’: Sen Fetterman Does Not Spare Fellow Dems Over Gov’t Shutdown Effects

‘Why Would You Wanna Punish All These Workers?’: Sen Fetterman Does Not Spare Fellow Dems Over Gov’t Shutdown Effects

March 15, 2026
DAVID BLACKMON: Oil Price Fear Premium Returns With A Vengeance

DAVID BLACKMON: Oil Price Fear Premium Returns With A Vengeance

March 14, 2026
DAVE BOSSIE: At Trump’s War Department, The Arsenal Of Freedom Roars Again

DAVE BOSSIE: At Trump’s War Department, The Arsenal Of Freedom Roars Again

March 14, 2026
Iran Claims Ships From All Countries May Transit Strait Of Hormuz, Except Israel, US

Iran Claims Ships From All Countries May Transit Strait Of Hormuz, Except Israel, US

March 14, 2026
Cubans Ransack Communist Party Headquarters, Ignite Fire

Cubans Ransack Communist Party Headquarters, Ignite Fire

March 14, 2026
How Using Talking Filibuster For Trump’s SAVE Act May Be Minefield For GOP

How Using Talking Filibuster For Trump’s SAVE Act May Be Minefield For GOP

March 14, 2026
Even Notorious Terror Group Hamas Thinks Iran’s Retaliatory Strikes On Neighbors Are Too Much

Even Notorious Terror Group Hamas Thinks Iran’s Retaliatory Strikes On Neighbors Are Too Much

March 14, 2026
‘You’re Saying We Picked The Fight?’: NewsNation Host Confronts Dem Rep Over Motivation Behind Iran Strikes

‘You’re Saying We Picked The Fight?’: NewsNation Host Confronts Dem Rep Over Motivation Behind Iran Strikes

March 14, 2026
WALKER WILDMON: Who Will Protect The Constitution After Thomas And Alito?

WALKER WILDMON: Who Will Protect The Constitution After Thomas And Alito?

March 14, 2026
EXCLUSIVE: ICE Nabs Illegal Trucker Who Allegedly Hospitalized Pedestrian

EXCLUSIVE: ICE Nabs Illegal Trucker Who Allegedly Hospitalized Pedestrian

March 14, 2026
  • Donald Trump
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Sunday, March 15, 2026
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

The Consummate Deal-Maker: Trump Tells Supreme Court He Wants To Resolve Tik-Tok Controversy

by Daily Caller News Foundation
December 27, 2024 at 8:10 pm
in News, Wire
241 12
0
The Consummate Deal-Maker: Trump Tells Supreme Court He Wants To Resolve Tik-Tok Controversy
493
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Daily Caller News Foundation

President-elect Donald Trump filed a brief Friday with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block a law requiring that the social media platform TikTok either be sold or shut down by Jan. 19.

In April, President Joe Biden signed legislation allowing the ban of the Chinese-owned social media platform unless it is sold to a non-Chinese company within the year. Despite the company’s attempts to challenge the legislation as the shutdown date approaches, a panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled unanimously on Dec. 6 that the ban would be upheld, citing TikTok as a potential national security risk due to the Chinese government’s involvement with the app.

In his new filing, Trump argued against the ban, seeking to resolve the issue “through political means once he takes office.”

“President Trump alone possesses the consummate deal-making expertise, the electoral mandate and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the government — concerns which President Trump himself has acknowledged,” the brief said.

The Supreme Court on Dec. 18 agreed to hear TikTok’s challenge against the ban, with oral arguments set to begin Jan. 10. In its emergency application to the high court, the social media platform argued that the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which is the basis for the ban, will not only “shutter” the U.S.’s “most popular speech platform the day before a presidential inauguration,” but will also “silence the speech of Applicants and the many Americans who use the platform to communicate about politics, commerce, arts, and other matters of public concern.”

Despite attempts to ban the app through executive orders, Trump publicly opposed legislation targeting TikTok, stating that the move to ban the social media platform could potentially benefit Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook.

“If you get rid of TikTok, Facebook and Zuckerschmuck will double their business. I don’t want Facebook, who cheated in the last Election, doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!” Trump posted to Truth Social in March.

In addition to his request to handle the issue once in office on Jan. 20, the brief noted Trump’s large following on TikTok, arguing that it allows him to “actively” communicate with supporters.

“President Trump is one of the most powerful, prolific and influential users of social media in history,” the brief said. “Consistent with his commanding presence in this area, President Trump currently has 14.7 million followers on TikTok with whom he actively communicates, allowing him to evaluate TikTok’s importance as a unique medium for freedom of expression, including core political speech.”

TikTok additionally filed a brief Friday to the Supreme Court claiming the law being used to aid the ban was a violation of the First Amendment.

“The government has banned an extraordinary amount of speech; demands deference to unsubstantiated predictions a future risk will materialize; and gets facts wrong when it bothers to provide them,” the brief said.

“Congress’s unprecedented attempt to single out petitioners and bar them from operating one of the nation’s most significant speech venues is profoundly unconstitutional,” the brief continued.

(Featured Image Media Credit: Flickr/https://nordskovmedia.dk/)

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Tags: DCNFpoliticsU.S. News
Share197Tweet123
Daily Caller News Foundation

Daily Caller News Foundation

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th