• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
US Supreme Court Will Not Allow Extension in Wisconsin Mail-in Ballot Deadline

US Supreme Court May Not Have Final Say in Presidential Election, Despite Trump Threat

November 4, 2020
Pentagon Gearing Up To Provide 20,000 Troops For Immigration Clampdown

Pentagon Gearing Up To Provide 20,000 Troops For Immigration Clampdown

June 5, 2025
NATO May Actually Pay Its Fair Share As Trump Turns Up the Heat

NATO May Actually Pay Its Fair Share As Trump Turns Up the Heat

June 5, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: GOP Sen Says ‘Big, Beautiful’ Bill Must Provide Permanent Tax Relief Before He Can Vote ‘Yes’

EXCLUSIVE: GOP Sen Says ‘Big, Beautiful’ Bill Must Provide Permanent Tax Relief Before He Can Vote ‘Yes’

June 5, 2025
DHS Manhunt Underway For Illegal Migrant Allegedly Behind Brutal Hit-And-Run Of Pedestrian

DHS Manhunt Underway For Illegal Migrant Allegedly Behind Brutal Hit-And-Run Of Pedestrian

June 5, 2025
Trump Reportedly Thought Ukraine’s Surprise Drone Strike Was Pretty ‘Badass’

Trump Reportedly Thought Ukraine’s Surprise Drone Strike Was Pretty ‘Badass’

June 5, 2025
AI Company Plays Wack-A-Mole To Keep Chinese Propagandists From Using ChatGPT To Sow Division In American Politics

AI Company Plays Wack-A-Mole To Keep Chinese Propagandists From Using ChatGPT To Sow Division In American Politics

June 5, 2025
MICHAEL WHATLEY: Americans Voted For The Big Beautiful Bill

MICHAEL WHATLEY: Americans Voted For The Big Beautiful Bill

June 5, 2025
Musk Mocked for Exhuberant Appearance at Trump Rally

Elon Musk Says ‘Without Me,’ Trump ‘Would Have Lost the Election’

June 5, 2025
Bill Clinton Takes To ‘The View’ To Brush Aside Deluge Of Reports About Biden’s Decline

Bill Clinton Takes To ‘The View’ To Brush Aside Deluge Of Reports About Biden’s Decline

June 5, 2025
Musk Describes Experiencing ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ Firsthand in Fox Interview 

Trump ‘Disappointed’ With Musk’s Criticism of ‘Big, Beautiful, Bill’ — Musk Fires Back

June 5, 2025
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu Confronted By Reporter As She Compares ICE Agents To Nazi Group

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu Confronted By Reporter As She Compares ICE Agents To Nazi Group

June 5, 2025
Key Senate Committee Looks To Nuke Biden Climate Spending In ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’

Key Senate Committee Looks To Nuke Biden Climate Spending In ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’

June 5, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • State of the Union
  • Elon Musk
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Thursday, June 5, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

US Supreme Court May Not Have Final Say in Presidential Election, Despite Trump Threat

by Reuters
November 4, 2020 at 6:38 pm
in News
237 15
1
US Supreme Court Will Not Allow Extension in Wisconsin Mail-in Ballot Deadline

A U.S. flag is seen during a demonstration before a vote on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., U.S., October 26, 2020. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

While President Donald Trump wants the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on a presidential race that is still too close to call, it may not be the final arbiter in this election, legal experts said.

They said it was doubtful that courts would entertain a bid by Trump to stop the counting of ballots that were received before or on Election Day, or that any dispute a court might handle would change the trajectory of the race in closely fought states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania.

With ballots still being counted in many states in the early hours of Wednesday morning, Trump made an appearance at the White House and falsely declared victory against Democratic challenger Joe Biden.

Trump railed against voting by mail during the election campaign, saying without providing evidence that it led to fraud, which is rare in U.S. elections. Sticking to that theme, Trump said: “This is a major fraud on our nation. We want the law to be used in a proper manner. So we’ll be going to the U.S. Supreme Court. We want all voting to stop.”

Trump did not provide any evidence to back up his claim of fraud or detail what litigation he would pursue at the Supreme Court. Later in the day, his campaign filed to intervene in a case already pending at the Supreme Court seeking to block late-arriving mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania.

The Trump campaign and other Republicans have also filed various complaints in other states, including an attempt to stop votes being counted in Michigan.

As of Wednesday evening, the election still hung in the balance. A handful of closely contested states could decide the outcome in the coming hours or days, as a large number of mail-in ballots cast amid the coronavirus pandemic appears to have drawn out the process.

However, legal experts said that while there could be objections to particular ballots or voting and counting procedures, it was unclear if such disputes would determine the final outcome.

Ned Foley, an election law expert at Ohio State University, said the current election does not have the ingredients that would create a situation like in the 2000 presidential race, when the Supreme Court ended a recount in George W. Bush’s favor against Democrat Al Gore.

“It’s extremely early on but at the moment it doesn’t seem apparent how this would end up where the U.S. Supreme Court would be decisive,” Foley said.

Both Republicans and Democrats have amassed armies of lawyers ready to go to the mat in a close race. Biden’s team includes Marc Elias, a top election attorney at the firm Perkins Coie, and former Solicitors General Donald Verrilli and Walter Dellinger. Trump’s lawyers include Matt Morgan, the president’s campaign general counsel, Supreme Court litigator William Consovoy, and Justin Clark, senior counsel to the campaign.

Trump attorney Jenna Ellis on Wednesday defended Trump’s bid to challenge the vote count and evaluate his legal options. “If we have to go through these legal challenges, that’s not unprecedented,” Ellis told Fox Business Network in an interview. “He wants to make sure that the election is not stolen.”

The case closest to being resolved by the Supreme Court is the Pennsylvania dispute in which Republicans are challenging a September ruling by Pennsylvania’s top court allowing mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received up to three days later to be counted.

The Supreme Court previously declined to fast-track an appeal by Republicans. But three conservative justices left open the possibility of taking up the case again after Election Day.

Even if the court were to take up the case and rule for Republicans, it may not determine the final vote in Pennsylvania, as the case only concerns mail-in ballots received after Nov. 3.

David Boies, who represented Gore in 2000, said it is unlikely that the Trump campaign would succeed in a possible third effort to block the extended deadline.

“I think that it’s more posturing and hope than anything else,” Boies said, adding that the Pennsylvania outcome could even become irrelevant, depending on the result in Michigan and Wisconsin.

In a separate Pennsylvania case filed in federal court in Philadelphia, Republicans have accused officials in suburban Montgomery County of illegally counting mail-in ballots early and also giving voters who submitted defective ballots a chance to re-vote.

If Biden secures 270 electoral votes without needing Pennsylvania, the likelihood of a legal fight in that state diminishes in any case, legal experts said.

And any challenge would also need to make its way through the usual court hierarchy.

“I think the Court would summarily turn away any effort by the President or his campaign to short-circuit the ordinary legal process,” said Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law.

“Even Bush v. Gore went through the Florida state courts first.”

(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York, Lawrence Hurley in Washington, Karen Freifeld in New York, Suzanne Barlyn in Washington Crossing, Pa., and Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Rosalba O’Brien and Grant McCool)

Tags: 2020 Presidential ElectionSupreme Court
Share196Tweet123
Reuters

Reuters

Reuters is an international news organization.

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th