• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
Expert on the Supreme Court Suggests Liberal Justices ‘Would Never Have Been Party’ to the Leak

Expert on the Supreme Court Suggests Liberal Justices ‘Would Never Have Been Party’ to the Leak

May 9, 2022
NYT Reader Faces Moral Quandary As Immigrant Neighbors Start Thriving Auto Body Shop In Driveway

NYT Reader Faces Moral Quandary As Immigrant Neighbors Start Thriving Auto Body Shop In Driveway

February 6, 2026
Ex-Democrat Strategist Explains Why Potential 2028 Rivals In Party Not ‘Attacking’ Harris

Ex-Democrat Strategist Explains Why Potential 2028 Rivals In Party Not ‘Attacking’ Harris

February 6, 2026
Detransitioner’s Victory Could Deal Death Blow To Trans Medical Industry

Detransitioner’s Victory Could Deal Death Blow To Trans Medical Industry

February 6, 2026
‘Nothing To See Here’: Dem Squad Member Doesn’t Want To Discuss Her $8 Million Wealth Jump Since Entering Congress

‘Nothing To See Here’: Dem Squad Member Doesn’t Want To Discuss Her $8 Million Wealth Jump Since Entering Congress

February 6, 2026
UN Begs For Cash, Claims Human Rights Office In ‘Survival Mode’ After Trump Cuts

UN Begs For Cash, Claims Human Rights Office In ‘Survival Mode’ After Trump Cuts

February 6, 2026
‘Batsh*t Crazy’: Top Trump Official Rebukes Democrats After Coal Saves Lives In Winter Storm Fern

‘Batsh*t Crazy’: Top Trump Official Rebukes Democrats After Coal Saves Lives In Winter Storm Fern

February 6, 2026
Amazon Raked In Billions While Whole Foods Workers Say They Can’t Afford Basic Necessities

Amazon Raked In Billions While Whole Foods Workers Say They Can’t Afford Basic Necessities

February 6, 2026
Trump Admin Suspends 111,620 ‘California Borrowers’ For Allegedly Committing Billions in Pandemic-Era Fraud

Trump Admin Suspends 111,620 ‘California Borrowers’ For Allegedly Committing Billions in Pandemic-Era Fraud

February 6, 2026
‘Outrageous Insults’: US Ambassador Taunts Poland With Troop Withdrawal After Polish Official Attacks Trump

‘Outrageous Insults’: US Ambassador Taunts Poland With Troop Withdrawal After Polish Official Attacks Trump

February 6, 2026
Kamala Harris’ Team Quickly Changes Name Of ‘Headquarters’ After Posting ‘Cringe’

Kamala Harris’ Team Quickly Changes Name Of ‘Headquarters’ After Posting ‘Cringe’

February 6, 2026
Tim Scott Rips Trump Over ‘Racist’ Meme Video Of Obamas — President Deletes It

Tim Scott Rips Trump Over ‘Racist’ Meme Video Of Obamas — President Deletes It

February 6, 2026
Senate Launches Investigation Into Mayor Mamdani, Threatens Taking $2.2 Billion In Federal Funding

Senate Launches Investigation Into Mayor Mamdani, Threatens Taking $2.2 Billion In Federal Funding

February 6, 2026
  • Donald Trump
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Friday, February 6, 2026
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Expert on the Supreme Court Suggests Liberal Justices ‘Would Never Have Been Party’ to the Leak

by Savannah Rychcik
May 9, 2022 at 4:05 pm
in News
250 2
0
Expert on the Supreme Court Suggests Liberal Justices ‘Would Never Have Been Party’ to the Leak

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 09: People ride bicycles pass the U.S. Supreme Court Building on May 09, 2022 in Washington, DC. Later today Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) will hold a procedural vote on making abortion legal throughout the United States and later this week it will be taken up by the entire U.S. Senate. However, the vote requires a sixty-vote threshold to pass, meaning it will likely fail. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Joan Biskupic, legal analyst at CNN and Supreme Court biographer, shared her thoughts on whether she believes liberal justices played a role in the leak of a draft opinion.

During an interview with NPR, Scott Simon asked Biskupic, “From what you’ve read of the draft, does it suggest to you any particular interest on the court would have more to gain from leaking it?”

She replied, “I don’t think it serves either side. First of all, in some ways, it would appear to present this as a pretty final document just because it’s now out there.”

Biskupic added, “And maybe in that respect, it could benefit the conservatives who really want this outcome of reversing the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.”

She suggested the “outrage that it has provoked would probably cause some pause.”

Biskupic continued, “But then from the liberal end, the three remaining liberals on the court – Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan – first of all, from what I know of them, they would never have been party to anything like this, and I doubt that their clerks would have been.”

Listen to the interview below:

Do you think they were involved with the leak?

Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yes: 89% (8 Votes)
No: 11% (1 Votes)

Nina Totenberg, a legal affairs correspondent for NPR, said the leading theory is the draft opinion was leaked by a conservative clerk.

“The leading theory is a conservative clerk who was afraid that one of the conservatives might be persuaded by Chief Justice Roberts to join a much more moderate opinion,” Totenberg said during an interview with ABC News Sunday.

She added, “There’s another theory that it was an outraged liberal clerk, but I think the only one that makes sense is that it came from somebody who was afraid this majority might not hold — that Chief Justice Roberts might persuade one of the conservatives to come over to him.”

Totenberg suggested it is “very unlikely” officials will find the leaker.

“You’re going to see the court will look like it is literally hunkered down, the security walls, all those kinds of things, at least till the end of June or later,” Totenberg said.

She continued, “This has emotionally put the court under seige in the same way that the Capitol across this very street was put under literal siege.”

ABC News reported Attorney General Merrick Garland would not say whether Justice Department or federal law enforcement resources have been requested or would be involved in the investigation of the leak.

Tags: Supreme CourtU.S. News
Share196Tweet123
Savannah Rychcik

Savannah Rychcik

IJR, Writer

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Thanks for reading IJR

Create your free account or log in to continue reading

Please enter a valid email
Forgot password?

By providing your information, you are entitled to Independent Journal Review`s email news updates free of charge. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and newsletter email usage

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th