Woolen Corporation of America v. Gitnig
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929-06-05 · cited 15×
The case concerned the confirmation of a composition offer made by bankrupts David and Nathan Gitnig in their voluntary bankruptcy filing, which a creditor, Woolen Corporation of America, opposed on the grounds that the bankrupts had issued materially false financial statements to obtain credit. The District Court, following a referee's report, confirmed the composition after finding insufficient evidence that the bankrupts knew the statements were false. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed, applying the Supreme Court's recent decision in Morimura, Arai & Co. v. Taback Bros. to hold that the evidence established reckless indifference by the bankrupts, who signed the statements without examining books or other available information despite their general knowledge of the business and omitted liabilities. The court therefore directed denial of confirmation on this basis and did not reach the alternative objection regarding the composition's benefit to creditors.