In Re Estate of Alexander
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1984-02-15 · cited 7×
The case concerned a dispute over the homestead property of Sam Alexander, deceased, between the estate's administratrix (his sister) and Margie Alexander, who had cohabited with Sam for about 30 years while still married to another man. Margie sought an equitable lien granting her lifetime use and occupancy of the house based on her domestic services and contributions, which the chancery court granted as a life estate. The Supreme Court of Mississippi reversed, holding that there was no evidence of an express or implied contract or expectation of compensation for the services, which were rendered in a household setting without any indication they were provided for pay. The court further determined that the parties' meretricious relationship did not support equitable relief against the estate's heirs.
family lawproperty
BD. OF SUP'RS, ETC. v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1984-01-18 · cited 17×
The case concerned whether a bottling plant built with funds from industrial revenue bonds issued by Lamar County qualified for exemption from ad valorem property taxes under Mississippi statutes. The Board of Supervisors sought to end the exemption after initially listing the project as tax-exempt, but the circuit court ruled in favor of the bottling company, and on rehearing the Supreme Court affirmed that ruling with modification. The core reasoning was that the statutory scheme for industrial development, including Mississippi Code §§ 27-31-1 and 57-3-33, together with the leaseback arrangement under which the county held title, rendered the project exempt from taxation for the authorized period. The court relied on prior precedent upholding such programs as serving public purposes through private entities.
taxesbusiness & regulatoryproperty
Miller v. McRae's, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1984-01-18 · cited 52×
In Miller v. McRae's, Inc., an employee sued her employer and security head for false imprisonment after being detained and questioned in an office about missing money, claiming the acts were willful and malicious and caused humiliation, reputational harm, and illness, with demands for actual and punitive damages. The trial court dismissed the suit without prejudice, ruling that the Mississippi Workmen's Compensation Act provided the exclusive remedy. The Supreme Court of Mississippi reversed and remanded, holding that the Act's exclusivity provision applies only to injuries that are compensable under its terms, which are limited to accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of employment; false imprisonment claims involve non-accidental harms like humiliation and loss of liberty that fall outside this definition. The court overruled a prior decision that had applied exclusivity without first confirming compensability under the statutory injury definition.
labor & employmenttorts & liability
Frey v. Abdo
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983-12-21 · cited 4×
This case involved a dispute over a commercial lease agreement where the lessee, Farm and Home Supply, Inc., and its guarantors failed to pay rent starting in June 1982. The lessor, Lucille A. Abdo, sued to collect all remaining rents for the lease term after declaring the lease forfeited. The court held that the lease language did not clearly include an acceleration clause or preserve liability for future unaccrued rents upon forfeiture. Therefore, the lessees and guarantors were liable only for rents that had accrued by the time the suit was filed on July 28, 1982, but not for subsequent rents.
propertybusiness & regulatory
White v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983-12-21 · cited 8×
Anderson White was convicted in the Circuit Court of Warren County of arson for allegedly burning his own automobile to defraud the insurer and was sentenced to eighteen months in custody. He appealed, assigning errors related to the denial of a suppression hearing and the admission of evidence from warrantless searches of the vehicle. The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed the conviction and rendered judgment for the appellant, concluding that the State failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the trial court committed plain error by refusing to grant a peremptory instruction.
criminal lawprocedure
Jackson v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983-12-21 · cited 11×
The case involved Tommy Lee Jackson, who was convicted of capital murder under Mississippi law for causing the death of William F. Hill while engaged in a robbery at a Greyhound Bus Station. The jury found Jackson guilty but sentenced him to life imprisonment rather than death. The court affirmed the conviction, reasoning that the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony of a struggle, blood evidence matching the victim, and medical testimony linking the victim's fatal heart attack to the trauma of the beating, was sufficient to support the jury's verdict beyond a reasonable doubt, while rejecting Jackson's claim that he was the victim of an attempted robbery.
criminal law