
Temples v. First National Bank of Laurel
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960-10-24 · cited 9×
The case concerned a dispute over title to mineral interests in 320 acres of land in Jones County, Mississippi, between the widow and heirs of G.L. Temples (who died in 1940) and the First National Bank of Laurel along with its grantees and lessees. The bank had foreclosed on a 1929 deed of trust after multiple renewals of the underlying debt, purchased the property at the 1937 sale, and exercised possession for over 21 years by conveying surface interests, leasing minerals, selling timber, and paying taxes. The heirs challenged the foreclosure's validity on statute-of-limitations grounds and sought to quiet title in their favor via cross-bill. The chancellor granted relief to the bank parties and dismissed the cross-bill; the Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the debt and deed of trust remained enforceable at foreclosure and that adverse possession independently confirmed the appellees' title. The court also sustained a motion to retax costs for unauthorized transcript inclusions.
property
Womble v. Mississippi State Highway Commission
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960-09-26 · cited 13×
This case was an eminent domain proceeding brought by the Mississippi State Highway Commission to acquire a portion of the Wombles' land in Yalobusha County for the construction of Interstate Highway 55. After a jury in circuit court awarded the landowners $10,650, the trial judge found the verdict grossly excessive based on valuation evidence from four Commission witnesses (ranging from $4,000 to $5,500) versus the owner's vague testimony claiming a $15,000 difference, and granted a new trial unless the landowners accepted a remittitur reducing the award to $7,950. The landowners refused the remittitur and appealed. The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed, ruling that the trial court's decision to grant a new trial was not a manifest abuse of discretion under the applicable standard of review.
propertyprocedure
Philley v. Toler
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960-09-19 · cited 7×
This case involved a dispute over an open account for gasoline, oil, and related products between a service station operator (appellant Philley) and a Gulf Refining Company distributor (appellee Toler), with the plaintiff seeking $7,729.59 and the defendant counterclaiming for an alleged overpayment of $3,255.50. After multiple trials and a prior appeal that reversed due to issues with amendments, continuances, and affidavits under Mississippi Code sections 1469 and 1754, a jury awarded the full amount to the plaintiff. On this appeal, the court reversed and remanded, holding that the trial court committed reversible error by excluding testimony from witness Fultz and barring examination of the appellee regarding 81 invoices that showed changes or markings potentially relevant to whether the items had been paid. The core reasoning was that this excluded evidence was material to impeaching the plaintiff's account and could have affected the verdict, despite the parties' competing sworn itemized accounts shifting the burden to prove each disputed item.
business & regulatoryprocedure
READY-MIX CONCRETE CO. v. Perry
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960-09-19
The case concerned a lawsuit by Ready-Mix Concrete against J.R. Perry alleging violations of Mississippi antitrust statutes (Sections 1088 and 1089) prohibiting restraint of trade and monopolistic practices, as well as usury statutes (Sections 36 and 37), all arising from the same set of business transactions, with the plaintiff seeking over $333,000 in damages across three counts. The trial court denied recovery on the usury counts but submitted the antitrust count to a jury, which returned a $15,000 verdict for the plaintiff; both parties appealed the adverse portions of the judgment. The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the judgment in full, concluding that the evidence supported the jury's award on the antitrust claim, the usury statutes did not apply to the facts, and procedural challenges regarding election of remedies and transfer to chancery court lacked merit under applicable constitutional and common-law rules.
business & regulatory
JENKINS, DBA MTR. TRSP. v. Cogan
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960-04-04 · cited 8×
The case involved a personal injury lawsuit by Bobby Trenton Cogan against Don Jenkins d/b/a Motor Transportation Service for damages from a liquefied petroleum gas explosion allegedly caused by the negligence of Jenkins' employee in attempting to replace a vapor return valve on a propane truck. The trial court jury returned a verdict for Jenkins, but Cogan cross-appealed on the inadequacy of damages due to the exclusion of a disfigurement instruction. On appeal, the Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the judgment on the direct appeal, reversed on the cross-appeal, and remanded for a new trial solely on damages, holding that disfigurement should be considered as an element of damages and that all facts on negligence and comparative negligence should be presented to the jury.
torts & liabilitybusiness & regulatoryprocedure
Pass v. Pass
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960-03-21 · cited 68×
In Pass v. Pass, a divorced father appealed a chancery court order increasing his monthly child support obligation from $50 to $90 to help fund his minor daughter's college education at the University of Mississippi, after custody of the daughter had been awarded to the mother. The daughter, who was under 18 at the time of the original decree and showed exceptional academic ability, sought the additional funds because the mother could not afford them while the father owned substantial farmland and other assets generating income. The court held that a father may be compelled to contribute to a minor child's college education when the child is qualified and shows aptitude, the parents are divorced and living apart, and the father has the financial capacity, drawing on the broad discretion granted by Mississippi Code Section 2743 to modify support decrees based on changed circumstances. The decision rejected claims of emancipation or lack of material change, emphasizing that parental duties extend to higher education in contemporary society to prepare children for citizenship and economic participation. The decree was affirmed.
family law