Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939-12-08 · cited 15×
The case involved the taxable situs of trust property physically located in Philadelphia County, where legislation apportioned the tax among counties based on the residences of multiple trustees. The majority upheld the statute, concluding that the state constitution contained no prohibition against directing tax collection and benefits to the trustees' home counties. The dissent contended that taxation requires a connection between the levy and benefits to the property or persons taxed, that the residence-based classification was arbitrary and lacked uniformity under the constitution, and that the law effectively allowed one county's property to be taxed for another's benefit without constitutional authority.
taxesproperty
Bausewine v. Philadelphia Police Pension Fund Ass'n
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939-12-05 · cited 19×
The case involved a retired Philadelphia police officer who had contributed to the city's Police Pension Fund Association for 29 years and became eligible for retirement pay in 1915; he continued working until retiring in 1924 but had his payments suspended in 1936 after taking a position as police chief in another borough. The Association argued that city appropriation ordinances barred payments to pensioners with other governmental employment and that insufficient fund income justified reduced payments. The court held that the officer's right to full retirement pay vested upon meeting eligibility requirements and could not be divested by later by-laws, ordinances, or conditions on city contributions. It ruled that employment in another municipality did not permit suspension of vested retirement benefits, which represent adjusted compensation partly funded by employee contributions. Judgment was affirmed for the officer, including post-suit payments, as the Association could not use ordinances to impair fixed rights.
labor & employment
Carroll's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939-10-03 · cited 14×
The case involved appeals by the Director of the Department of Public Safety of Pittsburgh challenging a lower court order that upheld the Civil Service Commission's decision sustaining an employee's dismissal and denied the Director the right to appeal. The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals. It reasoned that the Act of May 31, 1933, explicitly grants appeal rights only to the removed employee from the Commission to the courts and then to the Supreme Court, with no such provision for the removing officer, and that a later 1939 statute reinforces this limitation by denying appeal rights to the city or removing officer. The legislature may validly restrict appeal rights for municipalities and their officers as agents of the state, though certiorari review of jurisdiction and proceedings remains available.
labor & employmentprocedure
Crozer's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939-09-25 · cited 11×
This case concerned whether dividends from coal mining and leasing companies, which represent net income without deductions for depletion or depreciation, should be apportioned between life tenants and remaindermen in trusts established by wills. The court decided that all such dividends should be awarded to the life tenants rather than being partially allocated to the principal for remaindermen. The core reasoning was that Pennsylvania follows a rule of property allowing life beneficiaries of wasting assets to retain all proceeds without setting aside a depletion fund, and the wills' direction to pay net income to life beneficiaries supported this without evidence of intent to depart from the rule. The corporate policies set by the testators as directors did not alter the interpretation of their personal wills or override the established legal principle.
property
Commonwealth v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939-06-19 · cited 83×
The case concerned Pennsylvania's 1935 franchise tax statute, which replaced the prior capital stock tax on foreign corporations with a 5-mill tax on a portion of the corporation's entire capital stock value allocated to the state via a three-factor formula based on tangible property, wages, and gross receipts. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., a Delaware holding company that had qualified to do limited business in Pennsylvania before withdrawing in 1935, challenged the tax settlement, arguing the formula unconstitutionally allocated too much value to the state because most of its intangible assets were located and used elsewhere. The lower court agreed, holding the allocation method arbitrary and the Act facially unconstitutional under the Due Process, Equal Protection, and Commerce Clauses. On appeal, the court examined whether the tax qualified as a franchise tax rather than a property tax and reviewed U.S. Supreme Court precedents upholding similar apportionment formulas for foreign corporations.
business & regulatorytaxes
Webb v. Hess
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939-05-24 · cited 7×
In Webb v. Hess, a pedestrian was fatally struck by the defendant's southbound car at a Harrisburg intersection after it collided with a westbound vehicle; the case reached the appellate court solely on challenges to the jury instructions regarding the driver's duties. The court affirmed the judgment finding the driver negligent. It reasoned that even with statutory right of way, a motorist must keep the vehicle under control, drive as a prudent person would under the circumstances, and continue to look for approaching traffic rather than blindly relying on the right of way, with a heightened duty of care owed to the pedestrian lawfully crossing the street.
torts & liability