NY Post Endorses Trump: His Reelection Would ‘Really Tick off Hollywood’

The New York Post is tossing its endorsement behind President Donald Trump as there are only eight days left until the Nov. 3 election.

“We can put annus horribilis, 2020, behind us and make America great again, again. We can do all this — if we make the right choice on Nov. 3,” the Post wrote on Monday.

It added, “The New York Post endorses President Donald J. Trump for re-election.”

The Post writes, “He championed lowering the corporate tax rate to a figure more in line with the rest of the industrialized world.” It also wrote later, “Trump also rejected the globalist axiom that trade deals and unfettered immigration were better for Americans.”

Touching on the confirmation hearings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, the Post writes:

“Most importantly, throughout his time in office and culminating with the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s judicial appointments promise to curb the leftward shift of the courts and the activism that Democrats have come to count on. The left has achieved through legal decisions what it couldn’t through legislation.”

The tabloid later adds, “The question is what matters more: words or actions? The media are enormously fixated on Trump’s tweets and extemporaneous remarks, never learning the lesson that most of the time, he is just riffing. In endorsing him, we’re choosing to focus on President Trump’s actions and accomplishments. He has kept his promises.”

It also called Democratic presidential Joe Biden “a figurehead candidate for the Democratic Party.”

The Post wrote:

“President Trump will not be looking to remake the country. He will trust that America will, given support but not interference, bounce back. He will, in short, not get in the way. Re-electing him is the best choice for the United States.

Plus, it’ll really tick off Hollywood.”

The Post’s endorsement of Trump follows after Biden has received endorsements by other publications.

The USA Today made its first-ever endorsement, tossing support behind Biden, as IJR previously reported on.

“Now, two weeks until Election Day, we suggest you consider a variation of the question Republican Ronald Reagan asked voters when he ran for president in 1980: Is America better off now than it was four years ago?” USA Today’s editorial board wrote.

On breaking tradition, the op-ed read, “If this were a choice between two capable major party nominees who happened to have opposing ideas, we wouldn’t choose sides.”

Responses

  1. Yes, PRETENDING! Rasmussen does NOT have a good reputation (you KNOW that), even though King Donald The Loser (and Lying Paul The Emeffer) like to refer to ONE poll that they were lucky enough to come close on years ago. THAT is not a stellar reputation.

    If YOU want to rely on a company that makes polls fit THEIR narrative, that’s on YOU, buddy.

  2. Walter Mitty PRETENDING?
    Give us your sources. You backed yourself into a corner again and acting like a lunatic.

  3. “Facts are facts Walter Mitty as I proved before.” Lying Paul The Emeffer

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA! You can’t even do elementary math to back up your big mouth, liar.

    “Rassmussen has been polling since 2003.”

    Liar. They have been PRETENDING all along to be a polling company. If YOU put any weight behind their polls, YOU are as big of a fool as King Donald The Loser is for doing the same thing.

    “You are just to (sic) ignorant to accept facts as facts.”

    Liar. You are just projecting again. You wouldn’t know a fact if it hit you. You have concussion, buddy.

  4. Facts are facts Walter Mitty as I proved before. Rassmussen has been polling since 2003. You are just to ignorant to accept facts as facts.

  5. Lying Paul The Emeffer is confused. He still thinks Rasmussen is a polling company.

    And your electoral math homework is STILL due BEFORE the election. It is worthless AFTER the election.

  6. Walter Mitty I ignored many requests from the nuns I had in school as I will yours. We shall see the true numbers next week. BTW who is ahead in the national POLL by Rasmussen today?

  7. To be fair, Lying Paul The Emeffer, the same thing was said by racists and white nationalists when we got our first black president. They were sooo upset. Not many of them followed through, though, either.

    Your electoral math is still due BEFORE next Tuesday’s election.

  8. Sure would Walter Mitty as many promised to do when Trump was elected in 16. Thanks for the intro to write this comment.

  9. Dear Leader is not just toying with fascism, with his recent Executive Order he is preparing for full on fascism in his second term. This country has to pull back from the brink.

    Loyalty tests to a president vs laws and our Constitution? Fascism 100%. Firing non-partisan, non-appointed administrators in the DOJ and intelligence services and appointing incompetent, loyal lackies are what fascists do. You SHOULD be afraid of this.

    axios.com/trump-firing-wray-haspel-esper-088cbd70-3524-4625-91f1-dbc985767c71.html

    We MUST elect better politicians.

Comments are closed.