Rowland Rupp, a student at Albany Law School of Union University, has filed a lawsuit accusing Professor Anthony Farley of racial and political discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other civil rights laws. The allegations are explosive.
According to the complaint, Rupp claims Farley “intentionally deactivated the classroom’s audio recording system” before abandoning the scheduled course instruction and launching into what Rupp describes as a hostile political and racial monologue aimed at white conservative students.
The lawsuit alleges that during the lecture, Farley claimed the Founding Fathers were “worse than Hitler” and asserted that conservatives “hate everyone – blacks, women, gays” and are trying to “conserve slavery.” Rupp further claims he was personally singled out.
The complaint states that Farley used Rupp’s appearance as an example of “what conservatives look like,” referring to them as “Daniel Boone.” It also alleges that Farley later harassed him on Facebook over his clothing, including a “Remember the Alamo” hat, and described his appearance as an “incel/MAGA look.”
Rupp says he endured approximately thirty minutes of what he considered abuse before informing Farley that he would leave the class and file a complaint with the law school. According to Rupp, he briefly placed his hand on Farley’s shoulder in a “non-threatening manner” while stating his intent to report the incident.
What happened next only escalated the situation.
After filing his complaint, Rupp alleges the law school failed to properly investigate, claiming administrators did not call witnesses or seek evidence. Meanwhile, Farley reportedly filed a disciplinary complaint of his own, accusing Rupp of assault and describing the interaction as a “crazy and racist scene.”
The accounts are starkly different. A response from Professor Farley has not yet been made public.
The complaint also alleges that Farley has previously been the subject of similar complaints.
The broader backdrop is a long-running debate over ideological diversity in higher education. Law schools, in particular, have faced scrutiny over political imbalance among faculty. Studies frequently cited in these discussions indicate that only a small percentage of law professors identify as conservative. Critics argue that such imbalance fosters an environment where progressive viewpoints dominate classroom discourse, while conservative or libertarian perspectives are marginalized.
Supporters of academic freedom counter that professors retain broad protections to explore controversial ideas, even when those ideas provoke strong reactions.
Legal experts note that cases like Rupp’s are notoriously difficult to win. Universities and faculty members often rely on robust First Amendment and academic freedom defenses. The immediate legal battle will likely center on whether the lawsuit survives initial motions to dismiss and proceeds to discovery — a phase that could potentially expose prior complaints or internal communications.
For now, the case raises a question echoing far beyond one classroom in Albany: Where is the line between academic freedom and alleged political hostility?
The post Professor Sued Following Remarks About Founding Fathers appeared first on Red Right Patriot.
