• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
US Supreme Court Dumps Last of Trump’s Election Appeals

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Police in Two Excessive Force Lawsuits

October 19, 2021
JOSH HAMMER: Intersectional Communist Zohran Mamdani Shows Democrats Can’t Quit Obamaism

JOSH HAMMER: Intersectional Communist Zohran Mamdani Shows Democrats Can’t Quit Obamaism

July 19, 2025
VIJAY JAYARAJ: Asia’s Pivot Toward Nuclear Energy

VIJAY JAYARAJ: Asia’s Pivot Toward Nuclear Energy

July 19, 2025
House Dems Begin To Take Credit For Provisions In Trump-Backed Law They Voted Against

House Dems Begin To Take Credit For Provisions In Trump-Backed Law They Voted Against

July 19, 2025
California’s Plan To Sue Trump For Literally Everything Might Not Pan Out As Newsom Hopes

California’s Plan To Sue Trump For Literally Everything Might Not Pan Out As Newsom Hopes

July 19, 2025
DOJ Formally Asks Manhattan Court To Unseal Epstein Grand Jury Testimony

DOJ Formally Asks Manhattan Court To Unseal Epstein Grand Jury Testimony

July 18, 2025
Trump Files Suit Against Murdoch Over WSJ Epstein Story

Trump Files Suit Against Murdoch Over WSJ Epstein Story

July 18, 2025
Susan Collins’ Approval Rating At Record Low, Poll Claims

Susan Collins’ Approval Rating At Record Low, Poll Claims

July 18, 2025
Pulitzer Prize-Winning WaPo Reporting Was Based Off ‘Blatantly False’ Intel, ODNI Report Says

Pulitzer Prize-Winning WaPo Reporting Was Based Off ‘Blatantly False’ Intel, ODNI Report Says

July 18, 2025
Scott Bessent Brutalizes His Biden-Era Predecessor After She Invokes China In Attempt To Get At Trump

Scott Bessent Brutalizes His Biden-Era Predecessor After She Invokes China In Attempt To Get At Trump

July 18, 2025
Israel Reportedly Took Major Step To Potentially Resettle Gazans

Israel Reportedly Took Major Step To Potentially Resettle Gazans

July 18, 2025
Senate Energy Dems Top The Hill With Gayest Committee Staff, Survey Shows

Senate Energy Dems Top The Hill With Gayest Committee Staff, Survey Shows

July 18, 2025
EPA Slashes Workforce, Reorganizes To Save American Taxpayers

EPA Slashes Workforce, Reorganizes To Save American Taxpayers

July 18, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • State of the Union
  • Elon Musk
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Saturday, July 19, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Police in Two Excessive Force Lawsuits

by Western Journal
October 19, 2021 at 2:05 pm
in News
242 10
0
US Supreme Court Dumps Last of Trump’s Election Appeals

FILE PHOTO: A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. November 10, 2020. (Hannah McKay/Reuters)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Liberals were left howling in rage Monday after one of the most controversial legal doctrines surrounding America’s police received a ringing endorsement from the U.S. Supreme Court.

Qualified immunity shields police officers from lawsuits that arise in the course of protecting the public unless they can be shown to have violated well-established rules or the Constitution.

Efforts to pass a police reform package in Congress this year foundered on Republicans’ refusal to pass a law wiping away that protection as progressives insisted upon it.

“Given that police violence, as a weapon of structural racism, continues to have devastating and deadly consequences for Black and brown lives across our country, we strongly urge you to not only maintain but strengthen the provision eliminating qualified immunity as negotiations in the Senate continue,” Democratic lawmakers, who included “squad” members Reps. Cori Bush of Missouri and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts, wrote in May, according to CNBC.

On Monday, in unsigned orders with no dissents, the Supreme Court ruled for the police in two cases that involved allegations of police misconduct, NBC News reported.

In a case from Union City, California, an officer was accused of excessive force when he put his knee on a man’s back while arresting him. The officer at the time was also trying to remove a knife from the man’s pocket.

In an Oklahoma case, two officers had been sued by the estate of a man they killed when he threatened them with a hammer in the city of Tahlequah.

“The doctrine of qualified immunity shields officers from civil liability so long as their conduct ‘does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known,'” the justices wrote in the Oklahoma ruling, according to Axios.

Qualified immunity protects “all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law,” said the opinion, which cited court precedent. It must be clear to “a reasonable officer that his conduct was unlawful in the situation he confronted,” the court said in that ruling.

The rulings sent liberals into spasms of anger.

Wrong just damn wrong. It gives them license to do whatever they want.

— Chris???? Moderate democrat. (@Cali3416) October 19, 2021

By shielding police officers from accountability, qualified immunity encourages more police violence against Black and Brown people. The Supreme Court remains unwilling to correct this injustice. Congress needs to pass my legislation to finally abolish qualified immunity. https://t.co/a0ePZrewjo

— Ed Markey (@SenMarkey) October 18, 2021

SCOTUS also doubled down on an extremely controversial aspect of its qualified immunity jurisprudence—the notion that a Fourth Amendment right is not “clearly established” unless there’s some very explicit precedent with nearly identical facts. This is bad news for QI opponents. pic.twitter.com/pGzt3Ppeps

— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) October 18, 2021

The issue for critics of the doctrine, as noted by CNN, is that an officer could violate the Constitution but get away with it unless there have been clearly established rules in highly similar cases to say that the officer’s conduct was unconstitutional.

However, police officers say the protection is essential to fend off lawsuits that have no merit and allow them to respond to situations as they occur.

Police critics said new laws are needed to weaken the doctrine of qualified immunity.

“It is absolutely important for state houses to open up their courthouse doors to individuals with claims against officers,” said Anya Bidwell of the Institute for Justice, which opposes qualified immunity, according to The Washington Post.

Bidwell said the rulings were not a surprise.

“The Supreme Court has consistently over the years emphasized it would defer to law enforcement when it comes to split second decision-making,” Bidwell said.

Do you agree with these Supreme Court rulings on qualified immunity?

Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yes: 100% (4 Votes)
No: 0% (0 Votes)

Joanna Schwartz, a researcher at the University of California at Los Angeles, said the “two decisions taken together send a message that the Supreme Court is not interested in participating in the regulation of police.”

Jay Schweikert, a research fellow the Cato Institute who studies the issue, said, “Monday’s cases are further evidence that the Supreme Court is not going to reconsider the fundamentals of the doctrine and the justices are reaffirming the general idea that in most cases plaintiffs still need to find a nearly identical precedent to make their case.”

“This means that until and unless Congress addresses qualified immunity, public officials can continue to violate people’s rights with impunity,” Schweikert said, according to CNN.

“This represents a doubling-down by the Supreme Court on qualified immunity,” said Barry Friedman, founding director of New York University School of Law’s Policing Project.

“If the state rules were clearer there would be less of an application of qualified immunity,” Friedman said. “I don’t believe the Supreme Court will conclude that officers should be immune from liability even if they violate clearly established state statutes.

“Making those rules clear is a next step.”

Patrick Yoes, president of the National Fraternal Order of Police, said the decisions were “consistent with our deeply held beliefs and prior Supreme Court decisions.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Tags: Law EnforcementpoliticsSupreme Court
Share196Tweet123
Western Journal

Western Journal

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th