Critical reception
The film was praised by critics upon its release.Time Magazine predicted that Little Women would “place Katharine Hepburn near the top of the list of U.S. box-office favorites”. Motion Picture Herald expected its attendance to bypass the attendance of films from the last eleven months. The Film Daily predicted that it would “get a rousing reception” and commented that “it seems as though the characters had actually come to life”.
Mordaunt Hall of The New York Times wrote, "The easy-going fashion in which George Cukor, the director, has set forth the beguiling incidents in pictorial form is so welcome after the stereotyped tales with stuffed shirts . . . The film begins in a gentle fashion and slips away smoothly without any forced attempt to help the finish to linger in the minds of the audience." He later rated it as #8 in the top ten best films of 1933.
Variety called it "a superbly human document, sombre in tone, stately and slow in movement, but always eloquent in its interpretations." John Mosher of The New Yorker declared it "an amazing triumph" and "a picture more intense, wrought with more feeling, than any other we are likely to see for a long time to come."
The New York World-Telegram credited the film "a stunningly clever job of recapturing on the screen all the simplicity and charm of its author", writing that Hepburn gave "an unforgettably brilliant performance and that once and for all she definitely proves how unlimited and effortless an actress she really is." The New York American wrote, "at the moment, and for days, weeks, months to come, Miss Hepburn's characterization will stand alone on a pedestal of flaming brilliance." Japanese audiences, which received the film a year after its release in the United States, enjoyed Hepburn's portrayal of Jo, critics praising its themes of love and loyalty.
Little Women has also received more recent critical attention. Tom Milne of TimeOut Film Guide says that even though the film has “a rich vein of sentiment, . . . Hepburn’s Jo, making a subversive choice of what she wants her life to be, . . . ensures that the cosiness isn’t everything.” Film historian Charlie Keil comments that scenes where Hepburn alternates between feminine and masculine traits for Jo shows both her acting skills and Jo's acting skills. Author Anne Boyd Rioux remarks that Hepburn emphasizes Jo's tomboyishness to the point that it suppresses her feminine traits. Leonard Martin’s Classic Movie Guide remarks, “[The] film offers endless pleasure no matter how many times you’ve seen it; a faithful, beautiful adaptation”.
Margaret Roarty of The Film Review writes, "The March sisters—save for Jo—are all interchangeable and never really get a chance to shine on their own" because "the film doesn't dwell on unpleasantness very long". She adds that Jo "simply accepts what's happening without much care." Hollywood historian Steven C. Smith credits it as "RKO's most successful release to date".
TV Guide rated the film four stars, calling it "unabashedly sentimental" and "an example of Hollywood's best filmmaking." It added, "The sets, costumes, lighting, and direction by George Cukor all contribute greatly to this magnificent film, but the performances, especially Hepburn's, are what make the simple story so moving . . . Released during the depths of the Depression, Little Women buoyed Americans' spirits. It still does."
Little Women was voted one of the ten best pictures of 1934 by Film Daily's annual poll of critics. The film was included by the Vatican in a list of important films compiled in 1995, under the category of "Art". Little Women has an approval rating of 89% on review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, based on 18 reviews, and an average rating of 8.4/10. Metacritic assigned the film a weighted average score of 92 out of 100, based on 7 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".