Overview
Nada, also titled The Nada Gang in the US, is a 1974 Franco-Italian political thriller film directed by Claude Chabrol, based on the novel of the same name by Jean-Patrick Manchette. It follows an anarchist group which, after kidnapping the United States Ambassador to France, is hunted down by the police, with both sides making use of uninhibited violence.
Plot
The anarchist group "Nada" decides to kidnap the United States Ambassador to France and demand a ransom for his release. Although some group members are reluctant to the plan, teacher Treuffais alone refuses to participate in the venture. During the operation, carried out in a brothel which the Ambassador regularly visits, a police officer and an undercover agent are killed. The Minister of the Interior orders Commissioner Goémond to find the hideout of the group, implying that the death of the hostage could be useful to the state as it would turn the public's opinion against the Left. During the attack on the group's refuge, all members except Diaz are killed, who executes his hostage before he flees. Goémond, who had arrested and violently interrogated Treuffais, waits for Diaz in Treuffais' apartment, convinced that Diaz will show up sooner or later. During the final shootout, both Goémond and Diaz are killed. Treuffais rings up a newspaper, offering to tell the full story of the Nada group.
Cast
The Nada group
Fabio Testi as Diaz
Maurice Garrel as Épaulard
Mariangela Melato as Cash
Michel Duchaussoy as Treuffais
Lou Castel as D'Arey
Others
Michel Aumont as Goémond
Didier Kaminka as Meyer
Katia Romanoff as Anna Meyer
André Falcon as the Minister
Lyle Joyce as Ambassador Poindexter
Viviane Romance as Mrs. Gabrielle
Daniel Lecourtois as the Prefect
Rudy Lenoir as Mr. Bouillon
Dominique Zardi as policeman
Henri Attal as policeman
François Perrot
Reception and legacy
The initial reaction of French critics towards Nada was reserved. While Jacques Grant of magazine Cinématographe called it a "poor film", Chabrol's former colleagues of Cahiers du Cinéma simply ignored it (as they had already done with Chabrol's three preceding works). Louis Chauvet of Le Figaro considered the scenario weak, but saw a maturation of the director's talent in purely cinematographic terms.
From Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).