Candace Owens Slams Influencers for Presuming Guilt in Charlie Kirk Assassination Case

Candace Owens criticizes influencers for claiming Tyler Robinson admitted guilt in the Charlie Kirk assassination before his not-guilty plea, insisting on the presumption of innocence and calling demands for the death penalty monstrous. The reaction is split, with supporters backing due process and critics accusing her of denialism or grifting amid evidence and standard legal proceedings.

“Go find every single worthless influencer who lied and gaslit you for months about this case, claiming that Tyler Robinson turned himself in and subsequently admitted his guilt. We simply do not hate these people enough. What they actually want is for the American court process to run “innocent until proven guilty”. It is utterly monstrous to insist that someone should be put be death before they are given a fair trial. And while a few of these influencers do it out of sincere stupidity, the majority of them do it for money. Better stated, they are prostitutes. We are at the beginning of this trial and every one of their lies will be exposed by the end of it.”