• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
EXCLUSIVE: ‘Debunked’ Study Served As Key Pillar In Academia’s DEI Temple

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Debunked’ Study Served As Key Pillar In Academia’s DEI Temple

May 14, 2025
Jasmine Crockett Literally Shimmies At Mention Of Dems Investigating Trump If Party Takes Back House

Jasmine Crockett Literally Shimmies At Mention Of Dems Investigating Trump If Party Takes Back House

May 25, 2025
‘Walk Of Shame’: Rand Paul Says GOP Using ‘Same Playbook’ As Dems By Not Removing Debt Ceiling From Bill

‘Walk Of Shame’: Rand Paul Says GOP Using ‘Same Playbook’ As Dems By Not Removing Debt Ceiling From Bill

May 25, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: GOP Rep Expresses Optimism That Senate Will Seek ‘Big, Beautiful’ Spending Cuts In Trump Bill

EXCLUSIVE: GOP Rep Expresses Optimism That Senate Will Seek ‘Big, Beautiful’ Spending Cuts In Trump Bill

May 25, 2025
Meet The Alleged Pro-Hamas Campus Radicals Scooped Up By Trump Admin

Meet The Alleged Pro-Hamas Campus Radicals Scooped Up By Trump Admin

May 25, 2025
Ron Johnson Predicts GOP Senators Will Put Up Roadblock To ‘Stop The Process’ On Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’

Ron Johnson Predicts GOP Senators Will Put Up Roadblock To ‘Stop The Process’ On Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’

May 25, 2025
DAVID BLACKMON: Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Smashes Biden’s Signature Climate Law Into Pieces

DAVID BLACKMON: Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Smashes Biden’s Signature Climate Law Into Pieces

May 25, 2025
‘This Motherf*ker’: Kamala Harris Wasn’t Too Pleased With Anderson Cooper After Post-Debate Grilling, Book Claims

‘This Motherf*ker’: Kamala Harris Wasn’t Too Pleased With Anderson Cooper After Post-Debate Grilling, Book Claims

May 25, 2025
LARRY PROVOST: Credit Downgrade Makes Trump Agenda More Important To Implement Than Ever

LARRY PROVOST: Credit Downgrade Makes Trump Agenda More Important To Implement Than Ever

May 25, 2025
Things Aren’t Going So Well For Netanyahu, But All Is Not Lost

Things Aren’t Going So Well For Netanyahu, But All Is Not Lost

May 25, 2025
How A ‘Nonpartisan’ Government Budget Office May Be Misleading Lawmakers On Spending As GOP Megabill Looms Large

How A ‘Nonpartisan’ Government Budget Office May Be Misleading Lawmakers On Spending As GOP Megabill Looms Large

May 25, 2025
Trump Touts West Point Sports in Commencement Address

Trump Touts West Point Sports in Commencement Address

May 24, 2025
Corporate America Retreats From Gay Pride Events Across US Amid Trump DEI Crackdown

Corporate America Retreats From Gay Pride Events Across US Amid Trump DEI Crackdown

May 24, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • State of the Union
  • Elon Musk
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Sunday, May 25, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Debunked’ Study Served As Key Pillar In Academia’s DEI Temple

by Daily Caller News Foundation
May 14, 2025 at 11:26 am
in News, Wire
242 10
0
EXCLUSIVE: ‘Debunked’ Study Served As Key Pillar In Academia’s DEI Temple
491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Daily Caller News Foundation

An unsound study alleging that white doctors are responsible for worse clinical outcomes with black newborns because of “spontaneous bias” serves as a tentpole propping up diversity, equity and inclusion in academic medicine, a new report by nonprofit Do No Harm argues.

The disparity in mortality rates between black newborns and white newborns declines by 58% if the black newborns are under the care of black physicians, according to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) in August 2020. Hundreds of media outlets, which were gripped at the time by the Black Lives Matter movement, covered the “debunked” paper, which ranks in the top 5% of studies over the last five years in terms of impact in the lay press, according to a data aggregator used by scholars called Altmetric.

But the coauthors of the study made a major methodological error, according to the Manhattan Institute, finding that controlling for very low birth weight newborns nullified the apparent effect of racial concordance on infant mortality. The authors buried an inconvenient data point in the appendix, a Freedom of Information Act request by Do No Harm further revealed in March 2025. Finally, one of the coauthors – a star academic heading a new center for health equity – left her university in April amid accusations from her staff of plagiarism and incompetence.

Now, the new report by Do No Harm shows the lasting impact of the study in the scientific literature despite its serious flaws. The flagship journals of prestigious medical associations often cited the paper in articles that advocate for affirmative action in medical school admissions and DEI programs for physicians, according to Do No Harm, which opposes identity politics in medical research and clinical practice.

In all, the study has received 786 citations in the scientific literature, Google Scholar shows. Sixty-six citations occurred this year.

The study is far from the only one to argue that a diverse workforce improves clinical outcomes through what may be commonly called cultural competence, but which the scientific literature describes as “racial concordance.” Yet the PNAS study is undoubtedly among the most influential.

The study provides a case study in how unsound science that serves a predetermined policy goal can permeate the scientific literature, the halls of academia and the media, the report argues. Its centrality to the scientific literature justifying DEI in academic medicine should provoke a second look at that scientific literature, according to Ian Kingsbury, director of Research at Do No Harm.

“This was holding up much of the DEI enterprise. It’s the foundational study in racial concordance mythology,” Kingsbury said.

The PNAS study even made its way into an amicus brief to the Supreme Court by dozens of medical associations led by the Association of American Medical Colleges in favor of affirmative action in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson cited the study in her dissent in the case.

But many prestigious journals published by major medical associations have also cited the study to support the premise that DEI programs supporting racial concordance improve clinical outcomes, the report alleges, including the American Academy of Pediatrics’ journal Pediatrics, Academic Medicine, the Journal of Neurosurgery and the Journal of Graduate Medical Education.

The study crops up in the policy guidance issued by these professional societies and in the policy papers written by think tanks, the report states.

For instance, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ “Committee on Advancing Equity in Obstetric and Gynecologic Health Care” cited the PNAS study in a 2024 guidance that states physicians should “acknowledge that the current system providing care for obstetric and gynecologic patients causes harm, particularly for marginalized and minoritized communities, and contributes to preventable and premature death.”

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics did not respond to requests for comment.

Medical associations have been slow to change course on DEI guidance, even as many of their members’ institutions have pulled back or eliminated DEI programs in response to President Donald Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order..

“What these organizations say is really important. They set the standards for their field and produce and disseminate policy,” said Kingsbury.

The enduring impact of the study also raises questions about the rigor of scientific journals and exposes the fallibility of peer review, according to Do No Harm. PNAS has not retracted the study.

When it comes to allegations of liberal bias in scientific journals, the racial concordance field may be “ground zero,” Kinsgbury said.

“You can see the ideological bent of this. For some reason it’s completely acceptable for journals – in order to make the claim that racial concordance is beneficial – to cite one or two bad studies, ignoring the weight of the evidence,” he said.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Tags: DCNFhealthcareU.S. News
Share196Tweet123
Daily Caller News Foundation

Daily Caller News Foundation

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th