• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
Trump Shares Whether He Would Drop Out if He Is Convicted and Sentenced

Harvard Law Professor Declares Jan. 6 Trump Indictment Is Not Likely to ‘Survive’

August 2, 2023
‘It’s Madness!’: Mark Halperin Slams NYT For Leaving Out Key Voices In Biden Autopen Story

‘It’s Madness!’: Mark Halperin Slams NYT For Leaving Out Key Voices In Biden Autopen Story

July 14, 2025
Pro-Democrat Group Raising Cash To Stalk ICE  As Violence Against Agents Skyrockets

Pro-Democrat Group Raising Cash To Stalk ICE As Violence Against Agents Skyrockets

July 14, 2025
Corporate Media Network Completely Omits Key Detail About ICE Marijuana Farm Raid

Corporate Media Network Completely Omits Key Detail About ICE Marijuana Farm Raid

July 14, 2025
JASON ISAAC: Left Exploits Personal Tragedy In Bid To Seize Climate Policy

JASON ISAAC: Left Exploits Personal Tragedy In Bid To Seize Climate Policy

July 14, 2025
Trailing GOP Sen Outraises Challenger In Brutal Primary Contest

Trailing GOP Sen Outraises Challenger In Brutal Primary Contest

July 14, 2025
Trump Threatens Russia With Tariffs Over Ukraine War

Trump Threatens Russia With Tariffs Over Ukraine War

July 14, 2025
FBI Reportedly Probing Deep State Anti-Trump Conspiracy Stretching Back To Russiagate

FBI Reportedly Probing Deep State Anti-Trump Conspiracy Stretching Back To Russiagate

July 14, 2025
Bill Maher Clashes With Actor Over Whether US Has ‘Plenty Of Room’ For More Immigrants

Bill Maher Clashes With Actor Over Whether US Has ‘Plenty Of Room’ For More Immigrants

July 14, 2025
Midwest City Might Have Just Found Their Own Socialist Version Of Zohran Mamdani

Midwest City Might Have Just Found Their Own Socialist Version Of Zohran Mamdani

July 14, 2025
Group Threatens Legal Action Against Tim Walz’s Affirmative Action Hiring Policy

Group Threatens Legal Action Against Tim Walz’s Affirmative Action Hiring Policy

July 14, 2025
Detained Weed Farm Illegals Dems Rushed To Defend Actually Have Heinous Rap Sheets

Detained Weed Farm Illegals Dems Rushed To Defend Actually Have Heinous Rap Sheets

July 14, 2025
Fire At Assisted Living Facility In Massachusetts Kills 9, Injures Dozens

Fire At Assisted Living Facility In Massachusetts Kills 9, Injures Dozens

July 14, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • State of the Union
  • Elon Musk
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Monday, July 14, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home Commentary

Harvard Law Professor Declares Jan. 6 Trump Indictment Is Not Likely to ‘Survive’

by Western Journal
August 2, 2023 at 4:06 pm
in Commentary
242 10
0
Trump Shares Whether He Would Drop Out if He Is Convicted and Sentenced

(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

It’s an indictment only a Democrat could love — but honest Americans should despise.

Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz, one of the best-known legal minds of his generation, took to Fox News “Hannity” on Tuesday to demolish the latest effort by special counsel Jack Smith to turn former President Donald Trump into a criminal.

And in the process, he made it clear just how poisonous the politics of the Merrick Garland Justice Department really are.

The 45-page indictment announced Tuesday charges Trump with four counts: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

But they all hinge on one essentially unprovable point, Dershowitz said.

Check out the segment here:

[firefly_embed]

[/firefly_embed]

Prosecutors claim “Donald Trump actually believed that he lost the election that everything he did was fraudulent that he conspired with unnamed lawyers mostly to affect the election,” Dershowitz said.

“So the government has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that subjectively Donald Trump actually believed that he lost the election and acted contrary to that belief.”

Nothing in the indictment backs that up, Dershowitz said.

“Now, I read the indictment very carefully. There is no smoking gun,” he said. “There is no one who is credibly prepared to testify that Donald Trump said to him, ‘I know personally I lost the election.’

“There’s a lot of evidence that people told him he lost the election, but you know Donald Trump, and you know that he’s going to make up his own mind, and they’re going to have a very hard time proving that.”

A “hard time proving that” is an understatement.

Even Trump’s worst detractors have to have difficulty believing that he actually thinks he lost the 2020 election. Tens of millions of his supporters have trouble believing it, given the hair-breadth margins of victory President Joe Biden recorded in key swing states, and the evident meddling of the FBI and the barons of social media — not to mention the lingering suspicions of more traditional election fixing that haven’t disappeared.

For Trump himself, who has been unfailingly consistent in his public statements about the vote for the past three years, it’s almost inconceivable.

But, as Dershowitz pointed out, Smith won’t be bringing his case in a jurisdiction of fair-minded Americans. The case is in Washington, D.C. — where Biden took more than 90 percent of the vote.

“Now, it’s the District of Columbia, 90 some-odd percent of the jury pool will have voted against them so they may actually get a conviction from a D.C. jury, but will it survive appellate review and review to the Supreme Court?

“I don’t think so.”

And that, essentially, is where the Smith prosecution is resting its case. He has a history of political prosecutions — including a corruption conviction of former Virginia Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell that was overturned by a unanimous Supreme Court in 2016. (It was an 8-0 vote. The seat left open by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February of that year was still open — and Democrats were trying to put Merrick Garland in it.)

This isn’t about pursuing “justice” in the traditional American understanding of the word. It’s about shopping a weak-as-water political prosecution to the most sympathetic jury pool in the country and landing a conviction that would stand as a public smear against the most popular political opponent of the current president.

It’s a tactic the likes of Vladimir Putin would admire (a guy who’s big on jailing the opposition).

But it has nothing to do with loyalty to the law.

That’s why, Dershowitz said, “the first motion his lawyers will make will be a change of venue to northern Virginia, where the jury pool will be fairer … and you could move it further, you could move it to southern Virginia, where it’s much more even. You could move it to an adjoining state.”

“Remember, this is a federal indictment. It doesn’t have to be tried within the state or the area. You can make a motion for a change of venue.”

It’s a rock-solid bet that Smith would fight a motion like that tooth and nail — probably with plenty of sob stories about how the “trauma” of the Jan. 6 Capitol incursion affected the D.C. population in a way unlike anywhere else in the country, and blah and blah and blah.

But the real issue would be that pretty much nowhere else in the country would the deck be so stacked in favor of Democrats.

“I agree with Professor Dershowitz,” Hannity said. “I believe he can’t get a fair trial in D.C. If the trial is in D.C., it’s a fait accomplis. It would be a guilty verdict.”

Dershowitz summed up the matter best as he explained why, even in the event of a conviction, the case wouldn’t survive a Supreme Court review.

“When you have the president of the United States’ people going after his opponent in a political election, it has to be beyond reproach,” he said. “It has to be without any problems. It has to be the strongest case in history.

“This doesn’t meet that standard.”

The only standard it does meet is political expedience.

And that means it meets the Democratic need of the moment, which is to smear Trump — and, by extension, his supporters — as much as possible for the benefit of Joe Biden re-election hopes.

It’s an indictment only a Democrat could love — but Americans should despise.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Tags: 2020 Election2024 ElectionDemocratsDonald TrumpJoe BidenpoliticsSean Hannity
Share196Tweet123
Western Journal

Western Journal

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th